The piece is jam-packed with stupid, so we’ll just hit the highlights here and dissect the inanity RPOJ style. :) Check out the original post here.
“Let’s get the most obvious out of the way first: TERFs are about as feminist as Jim Davidson. They’re also very comfortable with forming political alliances with conservative men, and indeed prefer to date conservative men as they have more in common with them politically.”
Can you see the fallacy here? I know I sure can. Rhymes with Fad Pomulem. Oh those dastardly radical feminists how could they even consider dating conservative men?!?!? Sounds like some serious shaming going on by ‘liberal feminist’ (NB: Shaming is what lib-fems do to shut people up when their faux-empowerment is shown to be a lie within the context of society: prostitution for example has been shown irrefutably to harm women, naming this problem for women as class angers the choosy-choice feminists to no end, as it illustrates that choices offered within a patriarchal context are quite the opposite of empowering) The irony along with the crappy argumentation is quite thick already.
“So it’s hardly a shock that they’ve been parroting patriarchal talking points.”
Which talking points exactly are you referring to? You don’t bother to mention it, so I guess we’ll have to take your word about radical feminists parroting patriarchal talking points. *rollseyes* Those radfems talk about how men should own up and take responsibility for their shitty behaviour – nothing but patriarchal talking points after all…
“Then we have the media transmisogynists like to pretend that trans women pose a problem for reproductive rights activism, which is a deliberately disingenuous misrepresentation of the fairly uncontroversial demand that when we talk about reproductive organs and human bodies, we’re gender-neutral about it, because that’s more precise. “
Read this fucking paragraph twice. First, the claim that ‘the media’ is transmisogynistic? Really? Transactivism is the new misogyny and finds near universal support in the mainstream media as it is not a threat to male power, or male preeminence in society. Transactivism is patriarchally approved, through and through and is treated a such.
Let’s look at the next nugget of wisdom. Trans identified Males (TiM’s) do not pose a problem to reproductive rights activism. Quite frankly, TiM’s don’t give a shit about reproductive rights activism because it doesn’t involve them because men (*trigger alert for those who don’t ‘do’ biological facts*) can’t get pregnant.
What I have seen the trans-activists push for is the removal of the mention of females regarding their biological processes – “Chestfeeding” “Birth Parent” and other female erasing poppy-cock.
So if your activism is includes erasing females and their biological processes from the public sphere it goddamn well is ‘a problem’ for reproductive rights activism.
Uncontroversial demands? That we separate the idea that reproductive organs (which generally determine biological sex) from the sex that they are associated from? How can disassociating male – has penis, and female – has vagina be fucking uncontroversial. The last time I checked I didn’t see any free floating vagina’s hanging around with a without a person of the matching biological sex attached to it.
You can fuck right off with your free form facts and redefintions of material reality. Your ideology is bunk, and you do not get to take me with you on your baseless twisted flights of fancy.
“It simply isn’t true that trans women are a block to reproductive rights. In fact, they’re doing more than any media transphobe ever has.”
Men are a barrier to reproductive rights. Whether or not they happen to believe they are women is irrelevant.
“How do we know this? One of the places to look is Ireland, where there is a huge struggle for access to abortion. I follow this activism keenly, and do what I can to support and boost their work,”
Handmaiden status achieved! You are so much closer to being regarded as fully human, just keep on supporting men and putting down females fighting for liberation from patriarchy – you will be granted human status soon…really soon, just around the corner…
” so I’m aware that there are a lot of trans women deeply involved in this crucial action. I’ve met many Irish trans feminists who participate in reproductive freedom work. And likewise, Irish feminists don’t want these UK TERFs anywhere near their work, having recently produced a widely-signed open letter telling TERFs exactly where to fuck off to.”
Yep, because chastising females for daring to speak against legislation that has negative effects on them is a completely feminist thing to do. Telling women to ‘fuck off’ and shut-up about their problems just resonates with empowerful female affirming action. Yeah, no.
“If you actually care about reproductive rights, you’d know this, and that’s how it becomes abundantly clear that your transmisogynistic bigots are simply using abortion access as a dogwhistle for “women are defined by reproductive organs and only that.”
Wow. It’s so nice to see the trans-rhetoric so powerfully restated with all relevant distortions intact. Radical feminists are not arguing that women are just vaginas, they are saying that the female class of people that happen to have vaginas are oppressed by patriarchal society *because* they possess these organs. One of the main axis of oppression for females in society is their biological sex. Funny how intersectionality when properly used never comes up when dealing with transactivist crowd.
“To me, feminism is always and has always involved liberating women from our biology. A refusal to define us by whether or not we can bear children. I’ve written before about how this biological essentialism promulgated by transmisogynistic bigot feminists is identical to that promulgated by misogynists. I’ve also defined my stance as pro-trans and pro-choice.”
Nice. Liberating does not mean erasing female biology from the public sphere. Acknowledging that biological sex is real and is a foundational source of oppression for women might be a start.
“But I want to say it once more, loudly, for the people at the back: trans rights and reproductive rights are intimately linked. You cannot have one without the other. It all boils down to bodily autonomy.”
Reproductive rights and right to self identify are not linked in any way. Females should have the right to determine what is best for themselves in terms of their reproductive choices. How the male ‘right’ to call themselves something they are not – even if they really really really really …really… feel it – isn’t even in the same fucking ballpark. It’s quite insulting to equate one of the most important struggles for female liberation with the insipidly desultory gender ‘self-identifications’ of men.
“Our struggles are the same, and scratch a transmisogynist, and it’ll bleed womb-botherer in the end. Don’t let them win, and let’s continue to stand shoulder to shoulder against these attacks.”
Just shaking my head. This is what happens when you let men centre themselves in feminism. This is why Feminism needs to centre females in their struggles to gain liberation in society, because once men get in, it becomes all about men and their problems.
Standing shoulder to shoulder with your oppressors! FML. This shambolic, inclusivity laced, Orwellian bafflegab that is masquerading as feminism needs to stop.
4 comments
March 29, 2018 at 7:34 am
john zande
I do so love the Red Pen.
Where on earth do these people grow these amazingly convoluted conspiracies? The amount of faith they have in humans to actually organise themselves (here, in some well-thought-through malignancy) is astonishing for just how wrong it is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 31, 2018 at 8:40 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
“Where on earth do these people grow these amazingly convoluted conspiracies?”
I really don’t know. The pressure to conform to male dictates is strong, I mean ostensibly, this person believes that they are feminist and doing good work for the cause.
“is astonishing for just how wrong it is.”
I agree. It is a testament to the power males wield in society. To get people to deny reality and embrace (and valiantly defend no less) a Topsy-turvery worldview is stupefying. If your ideology cannot answer basic questions without circularity – for instance, “What is a woman?” – one should be wary of any assumptions that come afterwards.
LikeLiked by 2 people
April 2, 2018 at 6:16 am
liberationislife
Thank you so much for tackling this. This bizarre claim that transactivism is supportive of female reproductive freedom (and conversely, that gender abolitionist feminists are not) seems to be on the increase. Its usage as a vague, slurring talking point against gender-critical feminists seems to be getting especially adopted by those who ‘identify’ as socialists, but aren’t terribly into justifying their points … I’ve been aware that gender-crit marxists need to tackle it more actively, but haven’t been able to get onto it.
So thanks again x
LikeLiked by 2 people
April 2, 2018 at 8:09 am
The Arbourist
@Liberationislife
My pleasure. Push back against this ideological tide is necessary as it threatens all the gains effective feminism has struggled for in society.
TiM’s and their handmaidens seem to be utilizing a scattershot approach in their crusade against female liberation. If it isn’t terfy ‘transphobic’ bigotry, it is claim of ‘white feminism’ and now this twisted, gutted version of intersectionality.
It seems the common thread all these tactics have in common is the desire to shut women up and keep them afraid of debating the problematic issues that face them.
It would seem that obfuscation rather than clear argumentation is the goal of many of the supporters of trans-ideology. The more I see of the claims being made by transactivists the more their position resembles the traditional patriarchal flak-machine that has always existed to keep women in their subservient role in society.
Feel free to take what ideas/quotes/words you need from here and use it as you see fit.
LikeLiked by 1 person