We as a society should prioritize the safety and security of women (adult human females) over the gender feels of men. This snippet from the Cambridge Radical Feminist Network expands upon this simple truth.
“Sex segregation in spaces where women are in positions of vulnerability is a legitimate and important precaution for women. Women exist in society where the risk of sexual assault is a simple reality of their lives — even young girls within UK schools are experiencing what has been described as an ‘epidemic’ of sexual violence from young boys. I could go into these statistics in more detail if it had not already been done countless times before. But the fact it has been done countless times before is the disturbing thing about the entire gender neutral toilets issue. Supposedly progressive commentators and politicians have seemingly decided that publicly supporting a postmodernist view of gender is more important even than these facts. Perhaps it is cowardice in the face of a vitriolic social-media ‘take down’ culture.
But perhaps it is something more simple, and depressing, than that: feminism — and other equality movements — have to deal with the difficult problem of ‘latent prejudice’. It can be tricky to tell when there is a true change of popular attitudes, or when instead there is a understanding that some attitudes cannot be expressed explicitly. Sometimes we only find out once people feel they have been given permission to express those attitudes. We saw that to some degree with the Bernie-Bro phenomenon — certain US leftists felt that their support for a ‘progressive’ Bernie Sanders meant they were able to criticise ‘not-as-progressive’ Hillary Clinton in sometimes violently sexist terms. The gender neutral and gender identity debates seem to represent something similar in the UK. Blatantly misogynistic tropes and a lazy disregard for women’s safety and concerns are being overlooked because it is in the service of a supposedly progressive cause.”
A good article overall, I recommend you follow the link back to Medium and read the entire piece.
14 comments
January 24, 2019 at 11:25 am
john zande
I’m banned from commenting here, but I think this post needs your attention.
https://ccithink.com/2019/01/23/what-a-sick-dream-new-yorks-new-freedom-to-kill-babies/
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2019 at 11:25 am
john zande
Oooops, *there, not here.
LikeLike
January 24, 2019 at 11:49 am
The Arbourist
Your villianous reputation precedes you sir. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2019 at 1:13 pm
john zande
Oh, he doesn’t like me one bit. Given the post, and the level of *thought* behind it, I think you can see why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 24, 2019 at 3:08 pm
The Arbourist
Prolly have to give it serious examination during weekend blogging time. It’s amazing how piously trashy some dudes can be..
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 27, 2019 at 2:31 pm
The Arbourist
Warm’n up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 27, 2019 at 2:33 pm
john zande
Just getting through his “See-No-Reality” filter will be impressive in and by itself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 27, 2019 at 2:40 pm
The Arbourist
@JZ
He hasn’t said much past the obligatory religious clutching of peals though. :>
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 27, 2019 at 2:47 pm
john zande
Did you get through? I’m looking at the thread but can only see David K’s commetns
LikeLike
January 27, 2019 at 2:54 pm
The Arbourist
I’m not sure what to say against the shield of willful ignorance. 🤨
LikeLike
January 27, 2019 at 3:02 pm
john zande
Ah, understood. True, he’s just spitting. Nothing to really take on except the poorly-thought-through thought bubble.
LikeLike
January 27, 2019 at 3:22 pm
The Arbourist
@JZ
It did inspire a new angle though. Perhaps a more generalized argument against the so called ‘sanctity of life’. One needs only to look around to see countless examples of man’s systematic dehumanization and murder of our fellow man. I think the concept of ‘sanctity of life’ is quite weak and is open to debate.
A new angle might be in order because science, clearly, isn’t a fruitful avenue of debate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 27, 2019 at 4:00 pm
john zande
Good idea.
LikeLike
January 27, 2019 at 4:05 pm
The Arbourist
It’s not super original but I dont recall this particular tact being used in the abortion debate…I’ll poke around a bit. 😀 Thanks JZ, making me think and stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person