<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://deadwildroses.com/2026/05/05/the-symmetry-test-why-some-moral-claims-hold-and-others-dont/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Dead Wild Roses</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-05T11:15:39+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>The Symmetry Test: Why Some Moral Claims Hold—and Others Don’t</news:title><news:keywords>Science, ethics, Bias, Epistemology, institutional trust, Moral Philosophy, philosophy of science, social construct, expertise, scientific realism, objectivity, reciprocity</news:keywords></news:news></url><url><loc>https://deadwildroses.com/2026/05/04/the-dwr-not-so-quick-hit-andrew-wilson-and-the-power-and-limits-of-moral-certainty/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Dead Wild Roses</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-04T11:58:30+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>The DWR Not so Quick Hit: Andrew Wilson and the Power—and Limits—of Moral Certainty</news:title><news:keywords>Secularism, Rhetoric, Moral Philosophy, Andrew Wilson, TRIGGERnometry, Debate Analysis</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>