Welcome to Dead Wild Roses.
This is a Canadian blog about politics, culture, science, religion, media, feminism, music, and the strange rituals of modern public life. The house style is skeptical, occasionally sharp, and allergic to fashionable certainty. Vituperation remains optional, though not always unavailable.
DWR began as a place to think out loud. It still is. The subjects have shifted over the years, but the basic instinct has not: examine the claim, check the mechanism, distrust moral theatre, and ask whether the institution demanding trust has earned it.
You will find essays here on Canadian politics, media bias, free speech, feminism, gender ideology, secular religion, public broadcasting, science, medicine, and the slow bureaucratic strangling of ordinary language. You will also find classical music, choral notes, satire, and the occasional detour, because a blog without detours becomes a pamphlet rack.
If you are new here
A few recurring themes will help you get oriented.
1. Institutions should earn trust
Much of DWR is concerned with what happens when institutions stop persuading and start managing. Public broadcasters, schools, universities, medical bodies, activist nonprofits, and bureaucracies all deserve scrutiny when they wrap political commitments in the language of compassion, safety, expertise, or inevitability.
Start with:
- The CBC Demonstrating Canada’s Two Standards of Compassion
A recent example of the site’s media criticism lane: the problem is not discomfort or satire, but the selective use of “compassionate” humiliation against disfavoured targets.
2. Moral language is often doing political work
One of the recurring arguments here is that words like kindness, inclusion, safety, harm, justice, and compassion often arrive carrying more than their dictionary meanings. Sometimes they clarify. Sometimes they end debate by making disagreement look indecent before the argument has even begun.
Start with:
- The Moral Valence Trap
A useful map of how ordinary disagreement gets moved from judgment into moral identity, where the question becomes not “is this true?” but “are you a good person?”
3. Public rituals need proportion
Recognition is not the same thing as saturation. A society can respect people without requiring every school, office, corporation, municipality, and institution to perform the same civic liturgy for months at a time.
Start with:
- Pride Needs Civic Proportion
This piece argues that dignity for gay and lesbian citizens does not require endless institutional performance or moral suspicion toward anyone who declines the ritual.
4. Women’s rights require ordinary reality
Another major lane here is the defence of female boundaries, sex-based language, and the right to say what everyone knew how to say five minutes ago. The point is not cruelty. The point is that law, policy, privacy, safety, and fairness become incoherent when institutions treat sex as a decorative detail.
Start with:
- Opinion: The Time To Rise is Now – The Fight For Female Rights, Boundaries, and Safety
A direct statement of the female-rights argument: women do not need permission to define themselves. - The Tickle v Giggle Ruling Is an Affront to Reality
A legal and cultural example of what happens when ordinary sex-based boundaries are treated as though they are bigotry.
5. Religion did not disappear. Some of it changed clothes.
DWR has a long-running anti-clerical streak, but the target is not only traditional religion. Modern secular institutions have produced their own sacred language, rituals, heresies, taboos, and priestly classes. The costume changed. The habits often did not.
Start with:
- DWR Sunday Religious Disservice: No Sacred Subjects
A compact statement of the anti-sacred-cow principle: if a claim enters public life and demands obedience, it can be questioned.
6. Music keeps the place human
DWR is not only politics and argument. The Friday music posts, choral notes, and classical interludes are part of the site’s rhythm. They are a reminder that civilization is not built by outrage alone, however tempting the comment section may make that seem.
Start with:
- The DWR Friday Baroque Interlude – Music For Awhile – Purcell
A good example of the music lane: grief, form, beauty, and a brief reprieve from institutional madness.
What to expect
Disagreement is welcome here. Slogan-dumping is boring. Evidence helps. Motive-reading usually does not. If you make a factual claim, bring something sturdier than vibes. If a sacred cow wanders into the yard, it may be inspected.
The blog is written by The Arbourist, based in Alberta, Canada, with a long-standing interest in politics, feminism, religion, science, media criticism, music, and whatever else refuses to stop being interesting.
Good next stops
- Why so curious? — the general about page.
- Commenting Suggestions — house norms for argument and disagreement.
- Music — Friday interludes, choral notes, and other civilizational ballast.
- Canada — politics, public institutions, and local civic irritation.
Welcome to Dead Wild Roses.
Bring an argument worth answering.


Your opinions…