Meandering though the Canadian progressive blogosphere I was struck by the amount of gloom and general disgust with our current electoral system. This response from a commenter Thinking Man Neil on Dawg’s Blawg that I’m cut and pasting summarizes things quite nicely.
“A very dark day for Canada. Stephen Harper’s antipathy for democracy is legendary: shutting down Parliament twice to avoid public accountability, being found in contempt of Parliament twice for refusing to release information to the House of Commons, covering the lies and scandals of his MP’s, staff, and advisers, giving his MP’s instructions to disrupt parliamentary committees to render them unworkable, violating campaign laws, eliminating funding for a program that allows ordinary Canadians to challenge unjust laws, legislation, and government policies at the Supreme Court level (now only the wealthy and corporations get heard) and equating dissent of his policies with a lack of patriotism and treason. Those are just a few I can think of off the top of my head.
Sixty years of social progress was lost last night. Harper wants to re-instate the death penalty, scrap universal health care for a for-profit system, eliminate public funding for political parties, curtail women’s rights to abortion, enact draconian “law and order” crime bills and engage in internet surveillance of the populace, give corporations and the wealthy while increasing military spending dramatically and pouring countless, precious Canadian kids into pointless meatgrinder wars just so he can thump his flabby, neocon chest.
Stephen Harper and Preston Manning — his former boss in the Reform Party — set out 25 years ago to polarize Canadian politics and destroy the centrist Liberal Party; they achieved that goal last night. Jack Layton’s 102-seat opposition NDP have been neutered even before they get through the door of the House of Commons by Harper’s overwhelming 167-seat majority. Fundamentalist evangelical Christians and Christian Dominionists and Reconstructionists who are strong Harper supporters and have been gaining considerable access and influence in the PMO and Privy Council will demand the advancement of a very socially conservative agenda, expecting the elimination of abortion rights, elimination of same-sex marriage rights and possible criminalization of gays, lesbians, and transgendereds, censorship control over media and culture and the possible re-instatement of anti-blasphemy laws, the teaching of creationism in science classes, elimination of funding for stem cell research, and the re-establishment of the preeminence of religion in society. Corporate interests will get massive tax cuts, an across the board roll back of environmental and consumer protection laws, reduced competition and acquisition regulations, elimination of worker’s rights to organize unions and collective bargaining, privatization of private and public pension plans, and increased foreign takeovers of Canadian natural resources including freshwater. And there won’t be thing one that the NDP opposition will be able to do to stop it.
Harper has worked tirelessly and ruthlessly for many years for this; he won’t allow it to be overturned by an “unwanted election” in four years. He has a tough, disciplined group of MP’s that he micro-manages with an iron fist, and his goal is to keep that in perpetuity in the form of a one-party system. His plans to eliminate the per-vote and election reimbursement public subsidies that will drastically reduce funds available for election campaigns for some parties while his party will reap enormous corporate donations. What we’ll be left with in the end is a situation akin to Saddam-era Iraq: token elections and token opposition with only one possible outcome.
My Canada, the Canada of tolerance, openness, freedom, and respect of and love for democracy, died last night. It’s been handed over to a group that values bigotry, misogyny, power, fear and ignorance over the better aspirations of our species.
I’m hoping it is not all as bad as Neil prognosticates. The idea though that we have to count on Harper to moderate his policies in order to be reelected in four years seems to be a very weak check on the sort of destructive policies he champions. It is May 3, 2011 – We’ll revisit this post and see where we are in a couple of months.





5 comments
May 3, 2011 at 1:17 pm
tildeb
Yeah, very disappointing. It’s not that Harper now has a majority – although that may be bad enough. He also has a majority in the Senate and, with 4 appointments to the Supreme Court coming up in this mandate, a majority on the bench. That’s what I find most disturbing: no checks or balances on his megalomania. This place is about to become Harperland, and as all Canadians know, (the guy pops up in public every Groundhog Day to do something stupid like get rid of the long form census) he needs an enemy. So who will it be? First the Court to justify his partisan appointments, but then? Get even with anyone and everything that shown him in the past to be wrong? Vindictiveness is his strongest suit, so I suspect the arts will be targeted (except for flute players who will come to live on the munificent $75 tax dollar exemption that swept him into power) followed closely by the CBC. The public sector will get hammered but to bring the soaring deficits under control someone is going to have to pay… and I don’t think it will be any of the big businesses. Hmm… oh, what the hell, who needs a middleclass when you have trickle down economics and half billion per piece of new warplane to point at to say Oooo, Ahhh. Direct taxation is bad politics, but healthcare? There is a lot of room for privatization lurking out there… without compromising the quality of care, of course, and the government’s championing of our universal system while passing the cost on to users. It’s going to happen, I think, and sooner rather than later so that there is time in the final 18 months to blame the NDP for all our economic woes.
And so my prediction goes.
LikeLike
May 3, 2011 at 1:25 pm
Bleatmop
Or we could take Harper at his word that he doesn’t want to reopen the abortion debate, one that he knows will end his chances for re-election. Also, I’m pretty sure that it’s law in Canada that federal party’s are not able to receive corporate donations, something that has hurt the LPC far more than the CPC as the CPC has a huge grass-roots organization and the LPC received most of their money from corporations before Chretien put that law into place.
Further-more, educational curriculum is a provincial jurisdiction. Health care is a provincial jurisdiction. Gay rights and Labor rights are very well established by the supreme court already, thus would require reopening the constitution to change those rulings.
Yes, corporations will probably receive huge tax cuts. Funding for progressive organizations will probably disappear. The thing is, the CPC will be 100% accountable for these actions. Harper has asked for his majority, and now he has it. We’ll see what the Canadian public thinks of his policies in 4 years. As for alternatives to the CPC, the LPC now has 4 years to rebuild their brand. The NDP has 4 years to convince us that they are a government in waiting. The Green Party has 4 years to convince everyone that Lizzy didn’t get elected solely as a protest vote.
It’ll be an interesting 4 years.
LikeLike
May 3, 2011 at 3:06 pm
Vern R. Kaine
Watch Health Care take a front-and-center seat again. Look up when the Canada Health Act expires and the Federal Government starts battling it out with the provinces again. No coincidence why the other candidates were barely talking health care and Layton was on the campaign trail, and why he quoted Tommy Douglas in his victory speech (at least to me, anyways!)
I agree with Bleatmop. The CPC now has no excuse to (try and) put their full agenda forward now. They’re now 100% accountable to the people who elected them. I also think they have the best opposition (I think) to challenge them where necessary and make them even further accountable.
Anyways, back to my first point: I think the proof or the test of this Parliament will be when the Health Care issue comes up again. It won’t be abortion, not corporate donations, gun registration, or any other issue that they battle over. Health Care will be the big one and I think this “snap” election was really a preparation for that fight.
LikeLike
May 3, 2011 at 6:16 pm
Sixth Estate
It’s definitely bad news. It’s definitely going to be a rough four years. But I don’t think it’s time to throw up our hands and say Harper is the next Saddam Hussein, either.
If Harper really wants to move forward by eliminating healthcare, rigging the court system, and privatizing everything imaginable, we really can’t stop him. But we can give him a fight. And in four years time, we can make very sure that the opposition that crushes him based on a record of corruption and chicanery will be a genuine progressive party and not the weak centre-right ghost the Liberal Party became under Chretien, Martin, and Ignatieff.
LikeLike
May 3, 2011 at 9:35 pm
Joel R
I wish Harper would do all that because then his being a douche would match my own level of douchatude.
(ed. edited for clarity)
LikeLike