You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Gender Ideology’ tag.
The queer radical gender cult decided that violence was the answer to a woman trying to speak her mind. This is not the way issues and disputed are mediated in a civilized society. Transgender ideology and so many of adherents have made it abundantly clear that they exist to wage war on women, children, and their rights, boundaries, and safety within our societies.
You do not get erase females in our society. Not ever. And most certainly not on my watch.
Brenden O’Neill speaks about the male gender terrorism being committed by the #bekind crew in the name of ‘trans rights’. (Go to the essay linked here to watch the video evidence for yourself.)
“Next time you’re reading a history book and find yourself wondering how Salem came to be consumed by such swirling hysteria, watch the clips of Posie’s persecution in New Zealand. This is how it happens. This is how the fear of witches can overrule reason and unleash the darkest, most punitive passions of the mob.
And what is Parker’s crime? What did this witch do? She said, ‘A woman is an adult human female’. That’s it. Parker, whose real name is Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull, is well known for her criticism of the ideology of transgenderism. She thinks a man never becomes a woman, no matter how many hormones he takes or surgeries he undergoes. She thinks if you were born male, you will die male, and in the time in between you have no right whatsoever to enter any women-only space.
This is heresy. Dissenting from the gospel of gender ideology is to the 21st century what dissenting from the actual gospels was to the 15th. And so Parker must be punished. It was a modern-day stoning, so mercifully they only threw soup and water and planks of cardboard at the blasphemer.
Parker organises public events called ‘Let Women Speak’. She has done it across the UK, in parts of the US, and for the past couple of weeks she’s been doing it in Australia and New Zealand.
It’s a genius initiative. She knows these gatherings of women who merely want to give voice to their profane belief that sex can never be changed will draw out crowds of intolerant trans activists and their allies. She knows the ‘Be Kind’ mob will do everything in its power to stop women from speaking. And she knows it will all brilliantly illustrate her core belief: that trans activism is misogyny in disguise, misogyny in drag, if you like, and that it has devoted itself to silencing women who believe in biology.
Australia and New Zealand played their parts brilliantly in Parker’s clever scheme. From Melbourne to Canberra, Hobart to Auckland, huge crowds of the right-on turned up to drown out the voices of the pesky women who dare to call men ‘men’. ‘Let women speak’, Parker says. ‘No’, says the mob. She incites them to confess their misogyny and intolerance in full public view. And they do.
Auckland was the worst. At Albert park in the centre of the city yesterday, the mob could not hide its vengeful loathing of the uppity women who disagree with its ideologies. Parker is a new kind of witch, one who willingly submits herself to a witch-trial, so that the rest of us might see just how dogmatic and unforgiving the new witch-hunters are. I am full of admiration for her. Her courage is shining a light on the visceral intolerance that advances under the banner of identity politics.”
The coercive tactics and social shaming that the transgender ideology almost always deploys is coming back to haunt them. People in a democratic society have the right to say “No” to an ideology that fundamentally misogynistic and corrosive for society.
People are vulnerable when they are isolated and feel alone. It is here many begin their journey into false acceptance and the ‘peace’ that belonging to cult brings.
“Technology has recently enabled destructive cults to arise that have no single authority figure. The authority is now “likes” and upvotes. No single person determines what is presented to the cult member as truth, it is the judgement of an anonymous, terminally online and unwell collective. The collective is enabled by social media.”
The following is a paraphrase from Mike Rothschild’s book, “The Storm is Upon Us”, is about the Q-Anon distributed online cult.
“Cultic movements like QAnon substitute good feelings of like-minded strangers and the dopamine hits of hating the things those people hate for the ups and downs of personal relationships. They blast away the possibility of strenuous debate or disagreement with someone you love, preferring to create a world where those who don’t feel the same way are the enemy, meant to be either destroyed or cut off from contact.”
Seems about right. What does he have to report from the collected wisdom of cult experts? Here is advice from that chapter, paraphrased:
* Family and friends are mostly powerless to help until the person is ready to change
* Stay in touch if possible, but on your terms. You don’t have to pretend to share their new beliefs.
* Try to unplug them from the internet (i.e. get them away from the toxic sludge)
* Understand it won’t happen overnight – disengagement is a process
* Do not use outdated terms or concepts (like brainwashing, deprogramming, etc.)
* Do not mock or belittle
* Do not attempt to debate or debunk
* Do not give up if it matters to you
—–
So we wait for the concussion to heal.
A close friend told us recently: this is just getting started. Your time horizon is going to be years.
Unfortunately, he is probably right.
The last paragraph is written by the parents who have lost their daughter to the transgender ideology cult. It will be a long road back.
This was the result of a male student ‘self-id’ing into a female sport locker room. The female child that complained about having a male perv on them and her Father were both subject to censure and school disciplinary procedures, including attempting to compel their speech and actions. Thankfully that bullshit was stopped dead in its tracks.
I am the mother of the trans student in question and my [son] daughter did not make any comments at all. The entire team can back this up, other than the girl that made up the story for attention.
This is slander, defamation of character, and we have secured a lawyer….
Travis responded:
I am the father of the girl you claim “made up a story for attention.” The truth is your son watched my daughter and multiple other girls change in the locker room. While he got a free show they got violated.
You think this is fine and dandy. I wonder how you would feel if I watched you undress?
For that transgression school officials demanded that Travis apologize, and ended a contract it had with him as coach of the school’s girls’ soccer team.
Claimed the ADF in its lawsuit:
The First Amendment does not countenance this kind of government censorship, where a public school mandates that students and coaches refrain from expressing any view that offends its prescribed views, particularly on an issue as important as whether the school should permit males identifying as girls to undress, shower and change in the girls’ locker room.
Travis and Blake Allen were entitled to express their views on that issue and, in expressing those views, to support them with what is a biological fact — that a biological teenage male is, indeed, a male.
This case presents a textbook example of unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, and Plaintiffs are entitled to all appropriate relief.
ADF summed up their argument:
By requiring Blake Allen to take part in a “restorative circle” to help her “understand the rights of students to access public accommodations … in a manner consistent with their gender identity” and “submit a reflective essay” that meets Defendants’ own standards in order to avoid additional out-of-school suspension, Defendants are seeking to compel her to speak in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
By requiring Travis Allen to issue a public apology for his September 29 Facebook post as a condition to be reinstated as a coach, Defendants are seeking to compel him to speak in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
The state of Vermont has created this problem by its willingness to buy into the current fad of “transgenderism.” It states that
- All students have a gender identity which is self-determined;
- All persons, including students attending school, have privacy rights.
Vermont defines “transgender” as “an individual whose gender identity or gender expression is different from the individual’s assigned sex at birth.”
Conflict is therefore inevitable, yet it never existed when the Genesis account was considered the basis of all law. Genesis 1:27, if Vermont state officials would follow it, eliminates the conflict: “God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him, male and female He created them.”
After reviewing the lawsuit, school officials backed down. Said ADF: “Shortly after filing the lawsuit, counsel for the school officials notified ADF attorneys that the superintendent was rescinding the disciplinary actions.”
Score one for the good guys.
I can remember back when the notion that gender, being sex stereotypes were something to be avoided or at least treated skeptically. The recent transgender ideology throws these notions out and fully embraces the toxicity that comes with gendered stereotypes.
—Chapters—
(0:00) – Coming Up
(0:57) – Intro
(2:22) – Writing “Trans”
(9:46) – Women and Biological Reality
(19:50) – Age Solidarity Among Women
(24:57) – Narcissism, a Key Contributor
(34:53) – Fetishes & the Unbalanced Psyche
(36:57) – Breaking the Fantasy
(42:25) – Freud & the Oedipal Complex
(48:11) – Context Defines Your Identity
(55:45) – Transhumanist “Meat Lego”
(59:40) – The Depth of the Battle, the Death of God
(1:05:54) – Lying to Children, Ellen Page
(1:10:27) – The Social Pillory
Hey parents you can start the child grooming process early with the help of CBC kids. This helpful section will indoctrinate your child into the hollow vacuum that is gender ideology and all the pathological self hatred that goes along with it. Children need stability in their formative years. Introducing them to the ever shifting sands of gender nonsense is not doing them any favours.
There are male and female pronouns. They correspond to the physical reality we encounter in society. Someone’s feelings about their sex can never change what their sex is.
How you feel about your sex is irrelevant. You are either male or female. The term Non-Binary is nothing-burger. It is a meaningless sexist term that has no bearing on the real world. Why sexist? Ask yourself, what is it to be to be a female or male? Automatically a list of societal sex stereotypes will appear in your consciousness.
Men and Women have personalities. Those claiming special identities should look into developing an actually interesting persona instead of making the rest of society play word games to appease them. More to the point, children do not to need look to adults with a paucity of personality on how to order their world.
Actually gender is about boys and girls. In society we have a set of gender stereotypes prescribed for males and female in society. Gender is mostly socially constructed arbitrary bullshit that is often a hindrance in the development of well rounded boys and girls. People from both sexes are free to enact gender traits/stereotypes either side of the binary. Enacting or following a particular set of gendered norms is simply that – it cannot and will not ever change your sex.
Gender Identity is nonsense that has subverted the idea of gender non conformity and the idea of having a personality and has replaced them with a fragile construction of basing your self worth on the validation and approval of others. In other words, a recipe for childhood disaster, because no other person is obligated to validate your subjective gender feelings. CBC Kids, how about let’s not groom children into the grievance/validation negative self spiral?
*Sigh* Can we not confuse children with millions of terms for people who lack adequate personality formation? That would be great. A big No Thank You to CBC kids and their program for destabilizing childhood identity formation.
Your opinions…