You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Atheism’ tag.

I’m an atheist. I do not believe in God, heaven, or some higher intelligence waiting behind the curtain of the universe.

Sometimes that feels like clarity. Sometimes it feels like standing unsheltered in the cold.

Cosmically speaking, we are clinging to an infinitesimal rock circling an ordinary star, drifting through a universe so vast and indifferent that its scale threatens to mock every human urgency. The things that consume us here—war, ideology, political decline, cultural mania, the fate of nations—loom enormous at ground level, yet from any larger vantage they begin to look terribly small, if not absurd.

If you stay in that frame too long, the philosophers are probably right: the line tends toward absurdism, or else toward nihilism. Once the biological imperatives are stripped bare—survive, reproduce, persist—you begin to ask what, exactly, remains, and the answers do not come easily.

Loss is what makes that question hurt.

It is one thing to reject religion in the abstract. It is another to think about the people and creatures you have loved and realize that, if you are right, they are simply gone.

I would love to be wrong about that. I would love there to be a place where what was lost was not really lost, only deferred; a place where I could see again those who were dear to me, where death turned out not to be final after all, where I could hold my cat Fiona again and feel her nose under the covers at bedtime because she had decided, as she often did, that sleep ought to be a shared enterprise. I would love to curl up with her again, give her the scritches she liked, and feel that small, warm, living certainty settle in beside me.

I would fucking love that.

But wanting something to be true does not make it so. Memory is what I have, and memory is not a permanent possession. It erodes. The edges soften. Details lose their fidelity. What once felt immediate recedes, and even love, in that sense, is left to contend with time’s slow vandalism.

So yes, I understand why human beings reached for religion.

A creature capable of love, foresight, memory, and self-consciousness is also capable of a particular kind of suffering. We do not merely lose what we love. We know in advance that we will lose it. We know we will die. We know those we cherish will die. It is not surprising that human beings built systems that promised permanence, reunion, justice, and meaning. Those promises are not arbitrary. They answer real pressures and speak to real wounds.

I do not believe those answers are true.

But I understand the need they answer, and I would be lying if I said I felt no pull from them myself. The appeal is obvious. To be told that love is not finally defeated, that separation is temporary, that the dead are not wholly gone, that all this grief is folded into some larger redeeming order—of course that is appealing. It is appealing because the alternative is so stark.

And yet I cannot make myself believe by force of will. I cannot call a thing true because I find it comforting. That leaves me where many unbelievers eventually find themselves: without eternity, without cosmic reassurance, and still very much in need of something that can be lived on.

When you cannot believe in eternity, you learn to survive on smaller mercies.

You remember what you can, even as memory fades. You invest in people while they are still here. You try to be useful. You try to make or sustain something that matters, however locally, however briefly. You accept that human meaning may not be ultimate and yet refuse, all the same, to treat it as nothing.

For me, a great deal of that has taken the form of music.

I’m a choir junkie. At one point I was singing in five different choirs. I have winnowed it down to four—still more than most people would consider sane—but singing remains one of the few things in life that feels unquestionably real to me. It demands breath, attention, discipline, listening, patience, and a willingness to stop treating your own moods as the center of the universe. You stand among other people and, together, make something that did not exist before. Then, almost as soon as it arrives, it vanishes.

That impermanence is part of the point. Music does not solve death. It does not restore the lost or promise reunion. It offers no metaphysical guarantee at all. What it can do, at its best, is create a moment of such concentrated beauty, order, and shared presence that the void is not answered so much as held at bay. For a little while, meaning is not argued into existence but felt.

The conductor John Eliot Gardiner, writing about Bach, titled his book Music in the Castle of Heaven. I cannot follow him all the way there. I do not believe there is a heaven waiting above or behind the world. But I know the feeling he is trying to name. I know what it is to stand inside a musical moment and feel that another human being, centuries ago, summoned something out of silence that still reaches into the present and gathers us up.

That is heaven enough on earth for me: not eternal life, not divine certainty, but the brief and radiant fact of human beings making something beautiful together in the face of darkness.

I am here at ground level, wanting only to lay a few bricks at the base—to help build, preserve, and share that fleeting experience with others. It is a small pool of light against the void.

And yes, it is small. It does not answer every question. It does not heal every wound. It certainly does not raise the dead. Fiona is still gone. The people we lose do not walk back through the door because a choir sings well enough. The universe does not owe us meaning, and music does not change that. Still, there are moments when a phrase resolves, a harmony opens, or a line of Bach lands with such strange and lucid rightness that one feels, however briefly, less abandoned inside things.

That is not eternity. But it is not nothing.

I criticize religion because it makes unfalsifiable claims about the structure of reality, and I do not think those claims become more credible simply because they are consoling. But my criticism does not cancel the deeper recognition beneath it: religion is trying to answer a question that does not disappear when the answer is rejected.

What do you do with loss?

What do you do with love that has nowhere left to go?

What do you do with the knowledge that everything you build, and everyone you care about, will eventually end?

Memory. Music. Friendship. Work. Service. The quiet dignity of being of some use to other people. The temporary grace of being known, and of knowing others, before the light goes out.

They are not eternity.

And sometimes, for mortal creatures like us, that has to be enough.

The atheist movement, once a beacon of skepticism and rational inquiry, was significantly disrupted by the emergence of Atheism+ in the early 2010s. Atheism+, an attempt to merge atheism with progressive social justice ideologies, particularly feminism and identity politics, shifted the focus from critiquing religious dogma to enforcing ideological conformity on issues like gender and sexuality. This pivot alienated many atheists who valued the movement’s original emphasis on evidence-based reasoning. As Amarnath Amarasingam notes in The Rise and Fall of the New Atheism, the integration of identity politics created tensions within the movement, with activists like Jen McCreight, who spearheaded campaigns like Boobquake, highlighting the schism by prioritizing feminist concerns over universal skeptical principles. The resulting infighting, as seen in online forums like Reddit’s r/atheism, fractured the community, with many feeling that Atheism+ mirrored the dogmatic rigidity it once opposed.

This ideological shift led some atheists to adopt tactics reminiscent of religious apologetics—name-calling, shaming, and deflections—particularly when defending progressive stances on biological sex. Rather than applying the same skepticism they used to dismantle theistic claims, many “woke” atheists embraced gender ideology without rigorous scrutiny, treating it as an unassailable truth akin to a new deity. Posts on X from 2021 highlight this irony, with users like @SwipeWright observing that a significant portion of the atheist community “fully bought into gender ideology and sex denialism,” abandoning critical thinking for ideological loyalty. This uncritical acceptance echoes the blind faith atheists once criticized, as arguments about biological sex are often dismissed with moralistic fervor rather than engaged with empirically, revealing a departure from the movement’s foundational commitment to reason.

The implosion of the atheist movement, driven by these internal conflicts, underscores a broader lesson: skepticism must be consistently applied, whether to gods or to fashionable ideologies. The New Atheism, once galvanized by figures like Dawkins and Harris, faltered as it became entangled with identity politics, losing its coherence as a unified force. Today, the movement’s legacy is a cautionary tale of how even rationalist communities can succumb to ideological pressures, adopting the same dogmatic tactics they once decried. For atheism to reclaim its intellectual rigor, it must return to its roots, questioning all claims—divine or secular—with unflinching skepticism.

 

The foundations of classically liberal societies, characterized by individual freedoms, rule of law, and democratic governance, are significantly influenced by Judeo-Christian values that shaped Western civilization. These values, rooted in the ethical and moral frameworks of Judaism and Christianity, provided a philosophical basis for concepts such as human dignity, personal responsibility, and the inherent worth of the individual. While secular ideologies emphasize empirical reasoning, historical evidence suggests that Judeo-Christian principles played a pivotal role in the development of modern liberties. This essay presents the strongest possible arguments for the influence of Judeo-Christian values on contemporary freedoms, ensuring historical accuracy and addressing potential criticisms from an objective perspective.

Human Dignity and Natural Rights

The Judeo-Christian concept of imago Dei—the belief that humans are created in the image of God—established a foundation for universal human dignity. Found in Genesis 1:26-27, this principle asserts that every individual possesses intrinsic value, regardless of social or economic status. This theological idea significantly influenced Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, who argued in his Two Treatises of Government (1689) that individuals have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which governments are obligated to protect (Locke, 1689). Scholars such as Jeremy Waldron and John Dunn emphasize that Locke’s political philosophy was deeply rooted in Christian theism, with his concept of human equality derived from the belief that all humans are equal before God (Waldron, 2002; Dunn, 1969). However, Locke’s ideas also drew from broader intellectual traditions, including Greek philosophy and Roman law, indicating that while Judeo-Christian values were a critical influence, they were not the sole driver of natural rights theory.

Rule of Law and Justice

Judeo-Christian teachings on justice and morality, particularly through the Ten Commandments and biblical legal codes in Exodus 20, contributed to the development of the rule of law. These teachings emphasized accountability, fairness, and the principle that laws apply equally to all, influencing key historical documents like the Magna Carta (1215), which curtailed monarchical power, and the U.S. Constitution (Hamburger, 2002). The Christian concept of a higher moral law, accountable to divine authority, reinforced the idea that no one, including rulers, is above the law—a cornerstone of liberal governance. Organizations like the National Center for Constitutional Studies highlight how biblical principles informed concepts such as the consent of the governed (NCCS, 2018). Nevertheless, other civilizations, including ancient Greece and Rome, also developed robust legal systems, suggesting that Judeo-Christian values were one of several influences on the rule of law.

Individual Conscience and Democratic Ideals

The Protestant Reformation, with its emphasis on individual conscience and the priesthood of all believers, challenged the centralized authority of the Catholic Church and fostered democratic principles. Reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin promoted personal interpretation of scripture, cultivating a culture of questioning authority and valuing individual agency. Historian Brad Gregory argues that this shift influenced protections like the U.S. First Amendment, which safeguards freedom of religion and speech (Gregory, 2012). Sources such as the Free Speech Center and Modern Reformation further note that the Reformation’s focus on individualism contributed to modern democratic thought (First Amendment Encyclopedia, 2023; Modern Reformation, 2022). However, the rise of democracy was also shaped by Enlightenment ideas and nationalism, indicating that the Reformation was a significant but not exclusive factor.

Addressing Counterarguments

Critics, particularly from secular perspectives, may argue that modern freedoms could have emerged solely through rational, secular reasoning, citing philosophers like Voltaire and Montesquieu, who championed individual rights and separation of powers. While secular contributions were substantial, historical evidence suggests that Judeo-Christian values provided a moral and cultural framework that lent legitimacy to these ideas during their formative periods. For instance, the concept of natural rights was grounded in Christian thought before being secularized, and the Reformation’s challenge to ecclesiastical authority paved the way for broader critiques of centralized power. This interplay between religious and secular influences underscores the complexity of the development of modern freedoms.

Conclusion

While modern liberal societies often operate under secular frameworks, their core freedoms—individual rights, rule of law, and democratic principles—owe a significant debt to Judeo-Christian values. The belief in human dignity, the emphasis on justice, and the promotion of individual conscience provided essential ethical and philosophical foundations for these liberties. However, these values were part of a broader historical process that included Greek, Roman, and secular Enlightenment influences. Recognizing this multifaceted heritage enriches our understanding of the roots of contemporary freedoms, offering a balanced perspective that respects both religious and secular contributions.

It’s so darn easy. :)

We are moving toward this sort of frank discussion when it comes to the religion of gender identity.  The days when we have a gender atheist the caliber of Richard Dawkins will not be here too soon.

 

Pretty much.  Believing in the grand Ooga-booga is just too many steps outside of rational belief.

 

This Blog best viewed with Ad-Block and Firefox!

What is ad block? It is an application that, at your discretion blocks out advertising so you can browse the internet for content as opposed to ads. If you do not have it, get it here so you can enjoy my blog without the insidious advertising.

Like Privacy?

Change your Browser to Duck Duck Go.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 383 other subscribers

Categories

May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives

Blogs I Follow

The DWR Community

  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • selflesse642e9390c's avatar
  • hbyd's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
  • Unknown's avatar
Kaine's Korner

Religion. Politics. Life.

Connect ALL the Dots

Solve ALL the Problems

Myrela

Art, health, civilizations, photography, nature, books, recipes, etc.

Women Are Human

Independent source for the top stories in worldwide gender identity news

Widdershins Worlds

LESBIAN SF & FANTASY WRITER, & ADVENTURER

silverapplequeen

herstory. poetry. recipes. rants.

Paul S. Graham

Communications, politics, peace and justice

Debbie Hayton

Transgender Teacher and Journalist

shakemyheadhollow

Conceptual spaces: politics, philosophy, art, literature, religion, cultural history

Our Better Natures

Loving, Growing, Being

Lyra

A topnotch WordPress.com site

I Won't Take It

Life After an Emotionally Abusive Relationship

Unpolished XX

No product, no face paint. I am enough.

Volunteer petunia

Observations and analysis on survival, love and struggle

femlab

the feminist exhibition space at the university of alberta

Raising Orlando

About gender, identity, parenting and containing multitudes

The Feminist Kitanu

Spreading the dangerous disease of radical feminism

trionascully.com

Not Afraid Of Virginia Woolf

Double Plus Good

The Evolution Will Not BeTelevised

la scapigliata

writer, doctor, wearer of many hats

Teach The Change

Teaching Artist/ Progressive Educator

Female Personhood

Identifying as female since the dawn of time.

Not The News in Briefs

A blog by Helen Saxby

SOLIDARITY WITH HELEN STEEL

A blog in support of Helen Steel

thenationalsentinel.wordpress.com/

Where media credibility has been reborn.

BigBooButch

Memoirs of a Butch Lesbian

RadFemSpiraling

Radical Feminism Discourse

a sledge and crowbar

deconstructing identity and culture

The Radical Pen

Fighting For Female Liberation from Patriarchy

Emma

Politics, things that make you think, and recreational breaks

Easilyriled's Blog

cranky. joyful. radical. funny. feminist.

Nordic Model Now!

Movement for the Abolition of Prostitution

The WordPress C(h)ronicle

These are the best links shared by people working with WordPress

HANDS ACROSS THE AISLE

Gender is the Problem, Not the Solution

fmnst

Peak Trans and other feminist topics

There Are So Many Things Wrong With This

if you don't like the news, make some of your own

Gentle Curiosity

Musing over important things. More questions than answers.

violetwisp

short commentaries, pretty pictures and strong opinions

Revive the Second Wave

gender-critical sex-negative intersectional radical feminism