Identity politics sow division and strife within society. We need to revisit the idea that we are all Canadians first and foremost. We come in all different shapes, beliefs, and abilities. Those differences and the acceptance of our actual diversity is what makes Canada a wonderful place to live and prosper.
Josh Denaas writes at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute about the change in activism over the years and how it has become less about gaining acceptance in society more about demanding to be accommodated regardless of the validity of the claim.
“I’m pleased that in 2023 LGBT people can be themselves in public, and that there is zero tolerance for bullying in schools and workplaces. That said, I’m starting to worry that some LGBT people are becoming the new bullies.
Rather than demand that we be free from discrimination, many LGBT activists now demand that people profess allegiance to a highly contested set of ideas about gender and sexuality by wearing the rainbow on their uniforms, hoisting the Pride Progress flag, or sending their children to schools where they’re required to sit through performances by drag queens. The message has shifted from “love is love and everyone is equal” to “you will endorse the most radical viewpoints on sexuality and gender or else.”
This change was captured recently in a viral recording of an Edmonton teacher berating Muslim students for skipping Pride celebrations at school. “We believe in freedom, we believe that people can marry whomever they want,” she said. “That is in the law, and if you don’t think that should be the law, you can’t be Canadian, you don’t belong here.”
People who hold different viewpoints not only belong in Canada, they’re protected by our constitution. In Canada, while people have a right to be treated equally under the law, they also have the right to freedom of religion and conscience, and freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. These rights are infringed when people are forced to profess or actively support ideas that they don’t believe.
For many, a recent sign that the goalposts had shifted was when National Hockey League goalie James Reimer refused to wear the rainbow symbol because it conflicted with his Christian beliefs. Rather than using this as an opportunity to engage in dialogue to try to understand and possibly change his views, the self-appointed spokespeople for the LGBT community labelled Reimer a bigot and said he should comply or lose his job.
There is no reason to believe Reimer is hateful. He said he wouldn’t wear the rainbow because he doesn’t support an “activity or lifestyle” but that he strongly believes that every person has value and that LGBT people should be welcome in hockey. Reimer did not say that LGBT people should have fewer legal rights or be excluded. Rather, he seemed to be saying that he doesn’t want to endorse gay sex or gay marriage. For many Canadians, these are incorrect or hurtful viewpoints, but the only way to change others’ minds about them is through good-faith dialogue.
Another sign that the goalposts had shifted was when the York Catholic District School Board decided not to raise the Pride Progress flag outside its headquarters. Politicians like New Democratic MPP Kristyn Wong-Tam responded by demanding that flying the flag be mandated at every school. Doug Eyolfson, a former Liberal MP from Manitoba, expressed a common sentiment in a tweet that tied the flag to LGBT suicide rates. “To resist a simple gesture like a Pride flag is hate,” Eyolfson wrote. “It is not ‘a difference of opinion’. It is not ‘religious principle’. It is hate, and it kills young people.”
Refusing to raise the rainbow flag or the Pride Progress flag is not inherently hateful, and it’s hard to believe kids would kill themselves because they don’t see a flag in front of their schools. What’s clear is that raising the flag is not a “simple gesture” for many people from religious backgrounds. To them, it amounts to actively participating in celebrating something that is inconsistent with sincerely held beliefs.
The politicians raising Pride Progress flags at schools, hospitals and police stations claim they are being “inclusive,” but it’s clear that they are making many Canadians feel excluded. When the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board announced Pride celebrations — a week after telling staff that students may not opt out of “2SLGBTQ+ learnings” — more than 40 per cent of kids at nine schools and more than 60 per cent of kids at two others stayed home.”
11 comments
June 19, 2023 at 9:43 am
tildeb
Against the vastness of people who think, “What’s the harm?” in going along with the TQ2SI+ portion of the LGB highjacked ‘movement’ (once an equality of rights movement for same sex attracted people but now an activist gender queer agenda), it’s difficult to simply encapsulate why being COMPELLED to support the agenda is in fact and deed supporting anti equality rights (and undermining the social acceptance of actual diversity) to the core. All of us must go along or be defined as a Deplorable Person.
Few people seem aware or even care that the ‘going along’ has real costs and causes real harm to real people in real life. This social imposition and hostile takeover of the public square by public institutions is a vital part of the queer agenda, a Marxist framework of power and hierarchy meant to necessarily celebrate transgression of any and all sexual expressions, not least of which is paedophilia, to vilify any and all who disagree with or criticize the agenda and it imposition, to sow social discord and division, categorize on the basis of sexual appetite and fetish competing groups under the guise of ‘rights’, and all done in order to remove any and all constraining boundaries. Supporting all of this falls under the general heading of being ‘kind’ and ‘tolerant’ and ‘progressive’ and being an ‘ally’. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the legal case for equality of rights shared by all individuals. That’s why it’s highjacked not just the LGB movement but women’s rights. So… what’s the harm?
If one actually listens to rather than dismisses this narrator for unrelated issues, I think we have an opportunity to see what’s really going on here:
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 19, 2023 at 10:14 am
tildeb
As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Soviet dissident and Nobel Prize winner said in how to defeat totalitarianism by the common person, live not by lies. Simple in principle, but takes courage in the moment.
That’s what is lacking today, ethical courage to be honest and respect what’s truly equal in rights, to see the TQ agenda under the Platinum Principle being espoused in public education today to much fanfare as if this defines kindness (treat people the way they want to be treated, and not the way you want to be treated) rather than under the equality principle known as the Golden Rule (treat others as you would like to be treated).
Live not by lies. Going along to get along when lies are the heart of such ‘tolerance’ and ‘inclusion’ and ‘diversity’ pretending equity of group based results means equality of rights between individuals creates victims, and celebrates harm. More of us need to stop doing this with our complacency and misplaced compassion and going along with being compelled.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 19, 2023 at 10:48 am
Infidel753
Coercing people to wear or display symbols of a particular ideology or belief is totalitarian. If they can require someone to wear a rainbow symbol, it’s not much of a step from there to requiring them to wear the symbol of a particular political party or of a favored religion.
It is not ‘a difference of opinion’. It is not ‘religious principle’. It is hate, and it kills young people
This is an increasingly common assertion of totalitarians and censors, and a dangerous, if ludicrous one. Since most people accept the principle of free speech when it comes to expressing opinions, those who want to silence their opponents insist that “hate” should not be part of such freedom of expression, and then proceed to re-define anything they don’t like as “hate”. But logically, protection for free speech must apply specifically to views which upset or offend people. Speech which doesn’t bother anybody doesn’t need such protection since no one would try to suppress it in the first place. A hateful opinion is still an opinion. Personally I find Eyolfson’s views much more “hateful” than Reimer’s, because they attack a value which is of existential importance to me, but I would not try to prevent him from expressing them.
Realistically, it’s vanishingly unlikely that expressing a viewpoint would kill anybody. if someone is so mentally fragile as to commit suicide because I say I don’t agree with an ideology, then that is a them problem, not a me problem.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 19, 2023 at 11:17 am
Estelle Kölner (Navigating by Shadow)
I’ll admit, it’s been nerve-wracking watching this unfold from the U.S. with its own inherent political high weirdness (thinking of Colin Quinn’s joke from “Unconstitutional” about Canada personified as Emilio Estevez and the U.S. as his brother Charlie Sheen). Hoping, as always, that reason prevails.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 19, 2023 at 1:28 pm
lungta mtn
Our flags of June
Canadian Maple Leaf and provincial only on official buildings (hospital, schools, provincial buildings)
plus American flag on tourist attractions
Any store front that has decoration is 100% red and white Canadian (almost 100% of stores)
Since the beginning of June
The only rainbow was preceeded by rain and followed by sun
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 24, 2023 at 7:42 am
The Arbourist
@ tildeb – We are going to have to, as a society, pump the brakes and slow down this ill considered activism. It seems to thrive for the very sake of agitation while not advancing any useful ideas/solutions to the problems society faces.
LikeLike
June 24, 2023 at 7:46 am
The Arbourist
@Infidel753
I kind of miss engaging with the religious, sure they committed you to hellfire for eternity and called you a sinner/heretic but at least they would talk. Trying the same with the activist left is usually such a fruitless activity – they cover their lack of arguments simply by calling everything they happen to disagree with as ‘hate’.
If not hate, then “erasure” is often deployed. *sigh*
Imagine if they actually wanted to test their ideas in reality…
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 24, 2023 at 7:47 am
The Arbourist
@ Estelle Kolner
Well we can help as long we do our part and speak the truth. It’s hard and dangerous sometimes, but so very necessary.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 24, 2023 at 7:48 am
The Arbourist
@ Lungta mtn
Lovely. A commitment to Canadian Values is always good to see. :)
LikeLike
June 24, 2023 at 7:49 am
tildeb
Until more people in positions of authority bother to try to understand the goals of Queer Theory, they’ll continue to felch this activism and claim it’s a very healthy and kind thing to do. Morons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
August 3, 2023 at 5:51 am
Looking For New Maxims – Freedom, Exchange of Ideas, and Rights | Dead Wild Roses
[…] much better. So started to lean into some of the bugbears the Right chases. For example, identity politics […]
LikeLike