It is encouraging to see capitalism used to actually do something, as opposed to swish money around a hollow economy and proclaim “Profit!” at the end as what has been the North American trend since the 1980’s.
“Researchers in China, the world’s leading provider of wind turbines and solar panels, are working toward making renewable energy cheaper, more efficient and a bigger part of the country’s power grid. But despite China’s rapid leap to being a global leader in the renewable energy field, more government investment is needed for research and development if China is to truly blaze a path toward a clean energy future, researchers say.
Zhao Xingzhong, professor at Wuhan University’s School of Physics and Technology, is researching dye-sensitised solar cells, a low-cost, high-efficiency alternative to more prevalent solid-state semiconductor solar cell technology.”
Go go China. The dependence on fossil fuels will be with us for awhile, but it nice to see some nations actually take the future seriously and begin to plan for it.
“Although Zhao’s team’s research is unique at home and abroad, he says support from the Chinese government is far from enough. He notes that Japan and South Korea have jointly invested about 1.6 billion U.S. dollars on research on third-generation solar technology since 2000. In China, however, Zhao says there have been just five native projects in the solar field in the last decade, with spending of around 4.5 million dollars per project.
“It is difficult to break through the technological bottleneck because of the inadequacy of (financial) input,” Zhao says”
Like most breakthrough products and technologies, renewable power innovation has come through the spending of the state who pays for the R&D of projects and then farms them out to the private sector where they can be made readily available to the public. (Although boo on China for what seems to be, at least in Zhao’s case underfunding his work.) It is one of the great myths of capitalism that private business is the dynamo that runs the economy, it is significant but far from the primary driver. It is the State, through Universities and publicly funded R&D institutes that contribute a great deal to the ‘innovation’ of our economies and societies.
“In recent years, China has become the global leader in renewable energy technology manufacturing, surpassing the United States in terms of both the number of wind turbines and solar panels it makes. The accounting firm Ernst & Young in September named China the best place to invest in renewable energy.
Chinese companies, led by the Jiangsu-based Suntech, have one-quarter of the world’s solar panel production capacity and are rapidly gaining market share by driving down prices using low-cost, large-scale factories. China’s 2009 stimulus package included subsidies for large solar installation projects.
In terms of wind power, home-grown companies have rapidly gained market share in recent years after the government raised local partnership requirements for foreign companies to 70 percent from 40 percent (the government has since removed local partnership requirements) and introduced major new subsidies and other incentives for Chinese wind power companies.”
The day is approaching when solar panels will not be out of range of most people. That will be a good day.
“Critics say China’s interest in renewable energy is essentially a business opportunity – most of what it produces is sold abroad – and that it is less interested in applying the more expensive technology at home. China has not yet caught up to the United States in terms of renewable energy production. The country is the biggest consumer of coal in the world and is expected to burn 4.5 billion tonnes of standard coal by 2020, according to figures from the National Energy Administration.
While coal will still make up two-thirds of China’s energy capacity in 2020, the government has promised to invest billions of dollars into the development of wind, solar and nuclear power. The country’s top legislature, the National People’s Congress, now requires power grid companies buy 100 percent of the electricity produced from renewable energy generators.”
For all the strides China has made in renewable energy, the magnitude of their economy and power needs dictates they well need to rely on coal well into the foreseeable future, as we do in North America. Hopefully, with another major power taking the lead in the development and manufacture of solar panels a renewable energy race might start and really kick things off here in North America where we have both the know how and the consumer base to make renewable energy feasible.




8 comments
January 6, 2011 at 12:05 am
Vern R. Kaine
“It is one of the great myths of capitalism that private business is the dynamo that runs the economy, it is significant but far from the primary driver. It is the State, through Universities and publicly funded R&D institutes that contribute a great deal to the ‘innovation’ of our economies and societies.”
Um, not really. That “great deal” number may be skewed just a bit. First, it’s much harder to get government grants, either through time, hoops to jump through, or both, than is publicly stated, and the panels are usually manned by bureaucrats who barely have a clue, not businesspeople. Also, many projects like these are usually only partially government-funded, and even so, that funding comes in at the end, not the beginning or during, when it’s crucial, so even though they put their nice government stamp on things at the beginning they come pretty late to the party.
The Government-supported Business Development Bank is a farce, so it’s really the billions available in private placement capital (Angels, VC’s, private investors) that is still the true “startup capital” of all these good ideas and is what truly gets them off the ground in most cases, even if government may be their first customer. This private capital, however, is much harder for government to track, put a finger on, and report so unless you’re in the middle of it, it may seem like Government’s doing all the work on innovation.
Regardless, I agree that it’s good for America (Canada) to have an adversary in the “green race”. Competition (a Capitalist principle!) can only make things better. :)
LikeLike
January 6, 2011 at 4:02 pm
Alan Scott
the Arbourist,
One again you show your vast knowledge of energy and economics. If you had a clue you would not be trumpeting China’s becoming the leading manufacturer of Solar and Wind toys.
Solar and Wind is not about harvesting renewable energy and replacing climate changing conventional energy. That is the last thing it is really about. It is about harvesting government subsidies from moronic Western Countries.
One of the selling points of the green economy was the jobs it would provide to the countries that embraced it. Well, just like everything else in manufacturing, the Chinese are reaping the benefits.
Quite funny don’t you think? Green subsidies from the US and Europe providing Chinese jobs. Another in a long list of left wing screw ups.
LikeLike
January 6, 2011 at 4:57 pm
Bleatmop
Funny, I thought it was the right wing market fundamentalists that exported all the manufacturing to China. I must have missed that chapter in history when it was the left wing trade unionists that exported the extensively profitable manufacturing of the west to China.
LikeLike
January 6, 2011 at 8:49 pm
The Arbourist
Um, not really. That “great deal” number may be skewed just a bit. First, it’s much harder to get government grants, either through time, hoops to jump through, or both, than is publicly stated, and the panels are usually manned by bureaucrats who barely have a clue, not businesspeople.
I knew you would have something to say about that particular bit Vern, but being that you are pro-business and I’m not we, unsurprisingly, have different points of view on how much the state is involved in innovation.
Computers, the internet, decoding the human genome come to mind when considering the model I propose in the article.
LikeLike
January 6, 2011 at 8:52 pm
The Arbourist
I’m just curious Mr.Scott, what has the left wing done correct in your esteemed opinion?
LikeLike
January 6, 2011 at 9:46 pm
Vern R. Kaine
I’m always predictable when it comes to that. :)
Wasn’t saying you were wrong – I don’t have any stats – just making the point that it’s sometimes hard to see what the private sector does in this regard because it’s not all corporations bragging, it’s private individuals who prefer to remain out of the limelight. I wish the government resources were a little less… governmenty(!), but at least they are there and Alberta does a great job of trying, being one of the most entrepreneurial provinces (if not the most).
And you’re right on the genome thing. A relative of mine was involved with that and worked out of the research park at U of C.
Just a shout out for the private investor, and yes, a little dig at government being slow, but sometimes that’s too hard to resist. ;)
Were/are you involved in the genome project? I stopped following it a few year ago.
p.s. they just had the documentary about who killed the electric car. You’ll probably never believe me, but I’m not as “pro-corporate” as you might think. :)
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 2:31 pm
Alan Scott
The Arbourist,
Yow, that is tough. I was hoping you would actually dispute my assertions that green was just about harvesting government money. That it had no legitimate economic purpose. Let us see vonce na, FDR was pretty left wing and he put a lot of Japanese Americans in camps, so can’t use that. Well he did win WW2.
Bleatmop,
The Chinese are quite ruthless about moving up the economic food chain. I don’t believe you know what you are talking about making a generalized statement about the extensively profitable manufacturing sector. The US lost the low end manufacturing sectors decades ago. Sweatshop sewing mills went first to Japan, which as it’s wages rose did not lament their departure to the Chinas of the world.
China wants to move to higher wage , higher value industries. They blackmail foreign companies to steal their technology when those companies enter the Chinese market. That my friend is what they have done to your green industries.
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 2:50 pm
The Arbourist
I was hoping you would actually dispute my assertions that green was just about harvesting government money.
Um, socialism for the rich is a prominent part of the state capitalist system, so really green companies harvesting money, the regular ones also harvesting government money, unsurprising to say the least.
LikeLike