Justice, like our society, is stratified. The type and response of the legal system depends very much on what class you are in and who you have managed to piss off.
“Bradley Manning is accused of humiliating the political establishment by revealing the complicity of top US officials in carrying out and covering up war crimes. In return for his act of conscience, the US government is torturing him, humiliating him and trying to keep him behind bars for life.
The lesson is clear, and soldiers take note: You’re better off committing a war crime than exposing one.
An Army intelligence officer stationed in Kuwait, the 23-year-old Manning – outraged at what he saw – allegedly leaked tens of thousands of State Department cables to the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks. These cables – cables that show US officials covering up everything from child rape in Afghanistan to an illegal, unauthorised bombing in Yemen.
Manning is also accused of leaking video evidence of US pilots gunning down more than a dozen Iraqis in Baghdad, including two Reuters journalists – and then killing a man who stopped to help them. The two young children of the passerby were also severely wounded.
“Well, it’s their fault for bringing kids into a battle,” a not-terribly-remorseful US pilot can be heard remarking in the July 2007 “Collateral Murder” video.”
Being the one small citizen has distinct disadvantages when attempting to do what is ethically correct. Bradley
Manning is being punished for exposing his state’s wrongdoings to the public. Raping children and illegally bombing nations gives Uncle Sam a black eye and for the bad PR Mr.Manning has to pay. Consider those responsible for the actions, what justice are they being dispensed? The wrathful vengeance that Mr.Manning is enduring? Hardly.
“None of the soldiers who carried out that war crime [the collateral murder video] have been punished, nor have any of the high-ranking officials who authorised it. And that’s par for the course. Indeed, committing war crimes is more likely to get a soldier a medal than a prison term. And authorising them? Well, that’ll get you a book deal and a six-digit speaking fee. Just ask George W Bush. Or Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld or Condoleezza Rice. Or the inexplicably “respectable” Colin Powell.
In fact, the record indicates Manning would today be far better off if he’d killed those men in Baghdad himself – and on the lecture circuit, rather than in solitary confinement.”
The funny thing is that we accept this as normal and mundane. The idea that the elite could be held responsible for their decisions is quite absurd, observe the justification:
“Almost five years later, not one of the men involved in the incident is behind bars. And despite an Army investigation revealing that statements made by the chain of command suggest they “believe Iraqi civilian lives are not as important as US lives”, with the murder of brown-skinned innocents considered “just the cost of doing business” – a direct quote from Maj Gen Eldon Bargewell’s 2006 investigation into the killings – none of their superiors are behind bars either.”
Yeppers, I’m glad I’m on the side of Justice and Accountability… meanwhile back in prison hell Mr.Manning continues to rot.
“Meanwhile, the Obama administration has decided to make Manning’s pre-trial existence as torturous as possible, holding him in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day since his arrested ten months ago – treatment which Psychologists for Social Responsibility notes is, “at the very least, a form of cruel, unusual and inhumane treatment in violation of US law”.
In addition to the horror of long-term solitary confinement, Manning is barred from exercising in his cell and is denied bed sheets or a pillow. And every five minutes, he must respond in the affirmative when asked by a guard if he’s “okay”.
Presumably he lies.
It gets worse. On his blog, Manning’s military lawyer, Lt Col David Coombs, reveals his client is now stripped of his clothing at night, left naked under careful surveillance for seven hours, and, when the 5:00am wake-up call comes, he’s then “forced to stand naked at the front of the cell”.
I’m sure Mr.Manning is embracing ‘hope & change’ wholeheartedly. This leads to a very interesting parallel with the Nixon governement.
“Remember back when Obama campaigned against such Bush-league torture tactics? Recall when candidate Obama said “government whistleblowers are part of a healthy democracy and must be protected from reprisal”? It appears his opposition to torture and support for whistleblowers was mere rhetoric. And then he took office.
Indeed, despite the grand promises and soaring oratory, Obama’s treatment of Manning is starkly reminiscent of none other than Richard Nixon.
Like Obama – who has prosecuted more whistleblowers than any president in history – Nixon had no sympathy for “snitches”, and no interest in the US public learning the truth about their government. And he likewise argued that Daniel Ellsberg, the leaker of the Pentagon Papers, had given “aid and comfort to the enemy” for revealing the facts about the war in Vietnam.
But there’s a difference. Richard Nixon never had the heroic whistleblower of his day thrown in solitary confinement and tortured. If only the same could be said for Barack Obama.”
I’m thinking that electing the best of the worst strategy is not really paying of for the citizens of the United States. I think that they need to find an independent candidate and throw the support of the people behind him or her because the Democrats and Republicans have nothing more than contempt and scorn to offer to the people of America.




12 comments
March 30, 2011 at 4:33 pm
Moe
“I think that they need to find an independent candidate and throw the support of the people behind him or her”
Wish I could beleive that’s possible. But I don’t. We may not ever succeed in stopping the march to a corporate state, but if we have a chance at all, it’ll depend on two serious reforms (for starters):
1. dump the primary system and replace it with something else
2. take redistricting – state and federal – entirely out of the hands of politicians and put the task in the hands of independent groups.
And maybe legislate a shorter campaign system as well.
But just the two things would open the system to people who cannot get in now and would break the power of incumbency.
If we can’t make it happen . . .
(How are you kiddo?)
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 7:14 pm
Alan Scott
The Arbourist ,
Politics makes strange bedfellows. I find myself on the same side as President Obama . Feels kind of eerie . As far as Bradley Manning , ” the heroic whistleblower “. That he ain’t .
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 7:15 pm
Vern R. Kaine
With the recent “attack” on Obama by the AP (i.e. the fact check on his Libya speech), I’m hoping (wishful) that it’s going to set the bar for this campaign and how each of the candidates will be scrutinized. More fact, less rhetoric.
I’m also hoping “The Donald” gives the Republican candidacy a good run. That’s the kind of celebrity we need to really shake things up (not Palin).
Canada’s election should be interesting as well. Arb, I’ve got a wild theory as to what a significant, underlying cause of this election call is. If interested, I’ll make you a private (friendly) bet.
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 7:25 pm
Vern R. Kaine
(Missplaced that reply – it was supposed to go under Moe – sorry!)
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 9:01 pm
The Arbourist
Certainly. :) But I won’t play if you are predicting another conservative minority as I do believe that is the House’s bet.
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 8:34 am
The Arbourist
If we can’t make it happen . . .
Dark times indeed.
(How are you kiddo?)
Enjoying a nice little spring break, doing my taxes, catching up on some reading, defuzzing the kitties. Spring break goes to quickly though. How about you, things going along well?
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 9:14 am
Moe
As long as I have Alan around (hi Alan) challenging every word, life remains interesting :)
And things are just fine.
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 9:19 am
Moe
“Under me”? Watch you mouth you ‘young’un’.
Trump will be much more entertaining than Palin, who I expect will melt away as even more, ahem, ‘newsworthy’ candidates come forth.
I’ve still got my money on Daniels. I think he’ll wait it out while the silly season plays out and then come in as a ‘voice of reason’. Which will be a great releif to many people including independents. His quiet low key persona might be just the ticket.
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 9:30 am
Moe
I just read the AP story and I think they made a weak case in spite of my own reactiion that the speech sounded all too much like Bush-lite.
That being said though, Libya and our involvement scares me to death. If pressed, I could make the President’s case in a way that even I would beleive, but that would only be a reason, but not quite a mission.
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 10:23 am
Vern R. Kaine
No, I think a Conservative Minority is where Canada’s headed once again (yawn, and nice waste of millions once again). This is more related to the “why” rather than to what end. I’ll shoot you an email (as closed to a “sealed envelope” as I can get).
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 10:26 am
Vern R. Kaine
I don’t think Obama had much room to play with in that speech without totally pissing off everybody. I think he’s hoping simply for the right outcome. Frum did a good piece on it which I believe most of us are thinking, that 1) the U.S. already had covert ops in there, 2) that there’s already private negotiations being made, 3) etc.
Interesting re: Daniels. I’ll need to take a closer look. My only hope at this point is two strong candidates for the people to decide from. Sad that it’s such a long-off hope!
LikeLike
March 31, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Alan Scott
Ms. Holland ,
” Moe
As long as I have Alan around (hi Alan) challenging every word, life remains interesting ”
No cheap arguments . You have to be prepared to defend your remarks . Which reminds me .
” I’ve still got my money on Daniels. I think he’ll wait it out while the silly season plays out and then come in as a ‘voice of reason’. Which will be a great releif to many people including independents. His quiet low key persona might be just the ticket. ”
Does that mean you would vote for Daniels over Obama ?
I am a take no prisoners Sarah Palin fan . Saw her in person once . But at this point I would vote for any Republican over Obama . I’d vote for anyone who could just talk out of one side of their mouth at a time .
Where was I, oh yes Bradley. In WWII they would have shot this guy for endangering his fellow soldiers .
LikeLike