Acting responsibly with your money, saving it perhaps?
You sir/madam are an idiot; at least according to the Bank of Canada. “Why are you not out there spending money and making the economy grow?”, asks our benevolent Central Bank. The temerity you have displayed (despicable saver!!), acting responsibly and not going credit debt wild is unacceptable. As a matter of fact, let’s punish you for your responsible fiscal behaviour.
My faithful readership by now is aware of the rambling nature of my commentary so I advise you to go to the CBC right now and watch the video about what I’m faffing on about before reading the rest of what I have to say. This is some scary shite we are talking about today and it highlights precisely what is going wrong with our Western Democracies. But before we get to that, lets get some quotes from the article and lay down a rough sketch to aid in understanding what “quantitative easing” is and how it is ruining your life.
“Every six weeks or so, they gather in Basel, Switzerland, for secret discussions and, to an extent at least, they act in concert.The decisions that emerge from those meetings affect the entire world. And yet the broad public has a dim understanding, if any, of the job they do. In fact, these individuals now wield at least as much influence over the lives of ordinary citizens as prime ministers and presidents.”
Let me assure you that this is not Shadow Cabal Cranktastical Serendipity Territory straight up. These people meet regularly and make policy in very ordinary hiding in plain sight sort of fashion. Our central bankers meet and then robustly plan the future of the world economy… no problems right?
“The tool they have used to change the world so profoundly is one they alone possess: creating money out of thin air. There is an economic term for this: quantitative easing. More colloquially, it’s called printing money. Since the great economic meltdown in 2008, these central bankers have probably saved the world’s economy from collapse, and dragged it into the unknown at the same time.”
I have trouble when the term “saving the world economy” means printing and then giving more money to the people who just finished wrecking the economy with hopes(!) that they would fix it and mend their avaricious ways (!!).
“Stock markets have risen on this tide of cheap money. So has real estate. So, arguably, has everything else. But there are two big concerns with what this new central banker elite has done. One is that no one really understands the consequences of pumping such vast amounts of money into the world economy. It’s already distorted the prices of certain assets, and some fear hyperinflation or market crashes are inevitable (the subject of tomorrow’s column). The other is that it’s caused a massive shift in wealth, from savers to borrowers, and is taking money out of the pockets of almost everyone approaching or at retirement age.“
I did not see Quantitative Easing in any of the party platforms in Canada. People are deciding by fiat, who is going to win and who is going to lose.
“Probably the most painful of the consequences of quantitative easing has been borne by the elderly. Most of that generation grew up believing that if you save and exercise prudence that you will earn at least a modest return on your hard-earned money to keep you comfortable in your old age, perhaps along with a pension. But the money-printing orgy of the last five years looks to have shot that notion to smithereens. Very deliberately, the central bankers have punished savers, pushing interest rates so low that any truly safe investment — and older people are always advised to play it safe — yields a negative return when inflation is factored in.”
So, the new economic paradigm is that investing or saving prudently is actively discouraged. It is just me or does this seem like greasing the skids for a race to the bottom on a global scale? Looking back to Canada we can see our Central Bank Mandarin preaching the value of the damage done to Canadians that have the audacity to save.
“As Canada has performed better than most Western nations, Carney has not ordered any new money printing. But he has kept interest rates down, and that has fed the real estate booms over the last few years in Vancouver, Toronto, Calgary and elsewhere. He scoffs at the suggestion that “the party” will end at some point. “I am not sure we are having a party right now,” he says. “It doesn’t feel like a party.” And, in fact, he has repeatedly expressed concern at the huge debt levels Canadians are accruing, at least partly because of his low-rate policies.
But surely he understands the anger of an older person watching their savings being eroded, I ask him.
Carney smiles grimly. That question is clearly a sore point. He gets a lot of mail on the topic. Canadians, he says, must understand that the alternative is massive unemployment and thousands of businesses going under, and “my experience with Canadians is that they tend to think about their neighbours and their children and more broadly … they care a little bit more than just about themselves.”
Seems like a lot of justification for keeping the “free market” afloat not to mention keeping the class that currently holds much of the wealth in the country protected and wealthy.
Being a citizen of the world I am rightly pissed off at the machinations going on because I wasn’t consulted. The absence of the political class on the issue speaks volume to the primacy of the Central Banks in our economies today. This sort of power without accountability is recipe for disaster.
Do note that when the money printing ends, the next bludgeon deployed is “Austerity”. Greece and Spain are certainly thriving under the auspices of this particular policy, one wonders who is next?




8 comments
May 4, 2013 at 7:46 pm
bleatmop
To me, this is just another indictment of unfettered capitalism. It saddens me that conservatives have convinced the voting world that this is the way to economic success for the masses. It is not. If you want a vision of the future if these guys are not stopped then simply buy a Dickens novel because that is the last time the world was in a nearly total plutocratic era.
So long as socialism remains a dirty word with the common voter and things like organized labour and labour laws are looked upon with derision, then things will only get worse.
So long as we have governments that allow our corporations to export manufacturing jobs to the developing world where they can pay the labour at a faction of our minimum wages and then allow them the trade the good back to the developing world without tariffs things will get worse. Free trade was never about the free exchange of good. It has always been about corporations finding cheap labour markets to exploit.
So long as the term “Canadians (or USians or whatever) wont do these jobs” goes unchallenged then things will become worse. It’s more that Canadian wont do horrible jobs and less that sustenance wages because they would not be able to afford to feed even themselves and their children. Allowing corporations to import “temporary foreign workers” in and exploit them into working themselves into debt and poverty with the ever present threat of being able to deport them simply by laying them off only makes things worse. The only problem these programs solve is for how corporations can exploit developing nation peoples without having to build factories in their countries.
So long as we keep doing any of these things, we keep giving more power to the people who you are talking about in the above article. I think the article highly understates the fact when they say they have almost as much power as a President or Prime Minister. The fact that we still have Presidents and Prime Ministers is the only thing that is keeping these people from seizing absolute control. One Person One Vote is still exceptionally powerful… but only if we have an educated and knowledgeable vote base. And how are these guys going to defeat that?? I mean, I guess they’d have to consistently attack any high quality public education system (or better yet, have their stooges do it for them) and consolidate the media and corporately control it. But that won’t happen, right?
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 11:34 pm
Richard Fantin (@RichardFantin)
Great piece, although I have to disagree with the assertion that the elderly are being effected the worst. In the immediate term, their suffering is much more.. visible. However, it is the 20-30 crowd (and in the near future, less than 20) which I believe is actually harmed the worst, or rather the consequences of harming them will be the worst.
The reason why I think this way is that while the elderly are on fixed incomes and are being starved of their savings, the upcoming generators of “wealth” are being starved of the ability to collect that wealth. Largely what is keeping the younger generations out of third-world style poverty today is the wealth generated by the baby boomer generation. IE: Plenty of parents have to co-sign for a mortgage because the younger generation doesn’t have any established wealth.
This is going to have long-term consequences, not just for this generation but multiple afterwards. If this generation is never provided the opportunity to save their wealth can never be established. Add to this student loans, mortgages, etc and there is a negative collective wealth due to the debt based infinite growth monetary system.
The elderly might be blowing through their savings, but the younger generations don’t have those savings to blow through when their time comes around.
Great stuff, and glad to see more and more blogs covering this information
Richard Fantin – Canadian Trends (http://canadiantrends.blogspot.ca/)
LikeLike
May 5, 2013 at 3:36 pm
Alan Scott
As a hard core capitalist, need I remind you guys that the Federal Reserve’s actions are occurring with our Left Wing President’s blessing. Trust me, we are pretty angry about Uncle Ben’s Weimar Republic policies. The race among the Western democracies to see who can devalue their money the fastest so they can sell their crap to their trading partners and put their workers out of a job, is not a Socialist verses Capitalist disagreement.
LikeLike
May 6, 2013 at 7:13 am
VR Kaine
Arb and Bleat,
I agree with many of your points. Printing money on the one hand and then telling the poor and middle-class that they ‘should’ be spending on the other is not only self-serving to the elite, but also criminal in my opinion. Where does one think all that new money happens to trickle up to? The elites.
I don’t, however, attribute this to any one political party. The elites play and are catered to by all parties in government.
Also, I once again have to disagree that this whole thing is somehow evidence of what the left tries to call “free market capitalism” because for one I believe it isn’t (for reasons I will state in a bit). For another, I think making that the enemy lets who you believe are the perpetrators off the hook.
To me, trying to blame or attack “free market capitalism” is not just misplaced blame when it comes to this issue, it’s also a useless and ineffective campaign. It’s like blaming the fox for what he’s doing in the chicken coop when that is, and always be, his nature. Are you going to try and guilt trip the fox into not eating chickens, or try and force him to not eat? Perhaps try and force him to ration what he eats to only his “fair share”?
These are fixes the left seems overly-focused on, while all the while no one’s really paying attention to the fact that the farmer has left the chicken coop door open, and even worse, perhaps is even standing there doing nothing while chickens get decimated.
Better to put focus on the farmer and their (in)activities in my opinion because a) they’re more at the source of the problem rather than the middle, b) they’re the ones making a conscious choice that can be easily influenced, and c) making changes at this level produces the most immediate results.
However, we don’t. As “chickens”, we stay fixated on the “fox” in fear rather angry at who is supposed to protect our eggs from it. Forgive the cheesy comparison, but I think it fits.
The government has let in, and keeps letting in, the foxes into the chicken coop to eat all they want and get fat no matter what the cost, while the people just sit in their boxes and really do nothing but “cluck”. With that I come back to where I think we both agree – it’s up to US to prevent or reverse this course through our two primary powers in western society – our power to spend, and our power to vote. Unfortunately we’re still using neither wisely.
In the US, we elected Bush who spent like a drunken sailor and gave money to the elite, only to then elect Obama who’s effectively allowed the elite to keep all of it that the elites received under Bush. Partners in crime, with to me a continually ignorant public as accomplices after the fact. Evidence? A direct quote I heard from a client and two other people the other day: “the Dow just hit a record 15,000 – the recovery is HERE, people.” Well great! Forget everything we were mad about two seconds ago and let’s start spending like prosperity’s here!
Our debt to asset ratio is over 100% in the US, and although much less in Canada I believe we’re still inching upwards toward that number – both under government watch and worse, with government support.
Double-whammy – spend more, yes, so the elites make more money and the dow reaches record highs again, but make it dollars given to us via credit cards at 18% in this 2% economy so we can further enslave the people and strip them of their wealth.
Keep buying those flat-screen tv’s, people! :)
LikeLike
May 7, 2013 at 9:10 am
The Arbourist
@Richard Fantin
Welcome to the blog :)
There is plenty suffering to go around. The elderly really do not have a lot of recourse as to what they can do. Jumping into the market and freewheeling just isn’t prudent at their incoming income level and years left.
I agree. I just hope that we get the best of the worst case scenarios and only have a couple of bubble bursts as the economies realign themselves versus a large implosion on a global scale that beats everyone down. Although, part of me thinks that such an event is necessary to reawaken people’s sense of solidarity and sense of societal responsibility.
LikeLike
May 7, 2013 at 9:41 am
The Arbourist
@Alan Scott
Hi Alan.
I agree with you that this isn’t a capitalist versus socialist argument. Some of what needs to be described uses economic terms derived from Marx, but it really isn’t about that. It is about the concentration of economic and political power in the hands of the few, and those few do not share our interests, thus it is bad for us.
Alan, I have to disagree with you about your analysis of your current president as being “Left-Wing”. If that was truly the case, you would had universal health care by now, especially during his first term when the Dems had both houses. Obama has typically acted right of center on most issues and continues to do so. Of course he has his sops that annoy social conservatives; SSM and abortion to name a few, but in most regards the Obama presidency is mostly a continuation of GWB’s.
I highly recommend reading the Obama Syndrome my Tariq Ali, to get an idea of what the book is like you can check out a talk that was recorded for youtube on the same topic.
LikeLike
May 7, 2013 at 3:27 pm
Alan Scott
The Arbourist,
I realize that pointing out where I believe your analysis of President Obama is wrong, would be pointless. We each see him from our point on the left-right scale. He might be a mid point between you and I. So I will leave it that I disagree.
LikeLike
May 10, 2013 at 12:49 am
VR Kaine
Hey Alan and Arb,
Check out this new article from The Brighter Life. Just reposted it to my blog. Talks about how the “left” has been more to the right in terms of economic policy and how administrations have simply governed more to the economic situation at the time than their ideologies.
http://brighterlife.ca/2013/03/27/canadian-politics-just-got-turned-upside-down/?wt.mc_id=en-ca:digital_adv:paid:Outbrain:BrighterLife:SEP:MONEY:Canadian-politics-just-got-turned-upside
LikeLike