Insight time folks. Many thanks to Alicen Gray for this.
“I often catch men in public checking me out with eyes full of lust, until they see the hair on my legs – at which point, they resort to a theatrical display of disgust. I’ve eavesdropped on groups of college-age guys talking about how they won’t perform oral sex on a woman if her labia are too prominent. One man who had been pursuing sex with me for three years, suddenly changed his mind when I revealed that I do not, and will not, shave off my pubic hair. In other words, many men stop being attracted to me when reminded that I am a woman, and not a young girl. Surely all of these men, who have a “preference” for the aforementioned qualities in women, aren’t pedophiles by the strict definition of the word. But it seems that a high number of men, likely as a result of deep cultural conditioning, find many of the same things attractive in a woman that a pedophile would find attractive in a girlchild. Small labia, tight vaginas, intact hymens, baby-soft skin, hairless limbs and vulvas, eternal youthfulness, tiny frail bodies …”
-Alicen Gray writing at the Feminist Current.




11 comments
January 28, 2016 at 10:02 am
Miep
I tried shaving my pubes and armpits once each. My thoughts on this matter can be summed up as “this is *awful,* how can women do this all the time?” All those nasty sharp ends pricking you within days, do they do this every day? Not to mention stuff like ingrown hairs. Men, feh.
LikeLike
January 28, 2016 at 11:06 am
makagutu
This has never crossed my mind
LikeLike
January 28, 2016 at 3:43 pm
The Arbourist
@Miep
The damnable things patriarchy does to differentiate women from the ‘norm’. :(
It sucks.
LikeLike
January 28, 2016 at 3:44 pm
The Arbourist
@Makagutu
The idea of shaving your pubes and pits, or the quote of Ms.Grey? :)
LikeLike
January 28, 2016 at 3:56 pm
jasonjshaw
3 years in pursuit of sex and a few little hairs scared him away? That is some ridiculous superficiality. The jump to the conclusion that a “high number of men” are like this is a bit troubling though. The most visible are not typically representative of the greater group.
It’s broad-stroke stereotyping like this that is good at turning people off from the modern feminist movement.
On a positive feminist note, this video came across my Facebook and I thought it was a rather clever idea!
LikeLike
January 30, 2016 at 6:09 am
roughseasinthemed
@ Jason. So why do most women shave axillae and legs at the (bare) minimum? Why is it ‘inappropriate’ to see public hairs outside a bikini on women?
LikeLike
January 30, 2016 at 2:04 pm
jasonjshaw
I have no issue with challenging those social conventions.
Painting all guys to be like that one guy putting so much time and effort into courting someone only to bail because of unshaved pubic hair is what I have a problem with. I would be quite shocked if that was a deal-breaker for even near the majority of guys.
LikeLike
January 30, 2016 at 2:47 pm
The Arbourist
@JJS
#Notallmen for the winz!
LikeLike
January 30, 2016 at 3:32 pm
jasonjshaw
Using that logic makes it perfectly acceptable to call all feminists man-haters. It’s not good logic regardless of the point of view.
That’s the problem with established belief systems!
LikeLike
January 31, 2016 at 9:01 am
The Arbourist
@JJS
There you go again using that word and then directly translating it to how YOU see the world. At this time, may I remind you about the last half of the title “the experience is different for women and men.
You are used to being the author/subject in your experience. Women are not, they as much of their reality is imposed upon them, thus as a (object)vessel to put experiences in. This duality makes the experience in society different for the sexes.
It is excellent logic when existing as female in society.
Getting back to formal logic land (divorced from the reality of society and women’s lived experienes),of course, logically not all men behave in manner “x”.
You end here. But the key bits are just around the corner.
Not all men demonstrate behaviour “x”, ***BUT*** enough men do actually exhibit behaviour “x” – thus a critical mass of men in society that do partake in “X” exist.
Women, without exclusive access to each and every man’s thought she encounters, therefore for their continued safety and well-being in society make assumptions about men as a class, until individual men – through their actions – prove the generalized assumption wrong.
You’ll love this, I’m sure, but see Schrödinger’s Rapist for more details.
I’m not sure what problem you are referring to. The responses radical feminism offers are predicated on what is happening in the real world.
Pornography is grooming men toward a certain set of values and preferences, being hairless and looking like a prepubescent girl is just the top of heap. Among the top searches for porn these days – “teen”, “young”, “Lolita”. All men, of course not, but enough men for it be a major fracking problem.
More radical feminist analysis from Gail Dines in an article from The Guardian:
LikeLike
February 1, 2016 at 4:38 am
makagutu
the quote of Ms Grey
LikeLike