Auntie Wanda discusses the super-sekrit radfem position on gender and biology. :)
http://auntiewanda.tumblr.com/post/155279602721/wow-what-a-headache-that-was-to-read-its-not
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- She was assaulted by her partner. Canada's top court is considering a potentially precedent-setting appeal
- ‘The Nazis were right': What the leaders of Canada’s biggest ‘nationalist’ group really want
- Carney lays out security 'guardrails' for China as Canada looks to build up relationship
- ‘I wouldn’t say they look good’: B.C. town combats complaints about tree stumps with festive decor
- Bowen Yang to depart Saturday Night Live mid-season
- Is the U.S. really ‘inflating’ Ryan Wedding’s image as drug kingpin?
- Turning pain into power: How a Cree fashion designer is working to inspire Indigenous youth
- Guelph inventor's instrument showcased on Resurrection soundtrack
- Jake Paul reports 'double broken jaw' in KO loss to Anthony Joshua
- Canada promised new parks and nature protection. Has that shifted with Carney in power?
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
4 comments
February 1, 2017 at 1:05 pm
lovetruthcourage
pretty much sums it up
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 1, 2017 at 5:39 pm
donesoverydone
Reblogged this on stop trans chauvinism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 2, 2017 at 12:43 pm
Transwidow
The interesting thing is that my ex understands just enough about feminism to reject the idea that there are female personalities, at least publicly, because he knows it sounds bad, but has still somehow decided that he has some nebulous female essence.
He says he has a female “brain map” that makes him expect to see a female in the mirror — no word on why that makes him a woman instead of a male with a faulty brain map (see: anorexics who aren’t fat). He also likes to cite those various and sundry studies that have nothing to do with transgenderism, saying things like female babies look at faces more than male babies. No word on why on earth he thinks he was one of those babies, and why that would make him a woman instead of a male with an atypical face-looking pattern (to say nothing of the fact that babies are socialized from day 1 and that factor can’t be eliminated).
It’s like creationism. Theory first, then tack on whatever “science” you think offends your particular audience the least.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 3, 2017 at 8:16 am
The Arbourist
@Transwidow
It seems like he’s doing the science wrong, as working back from a preferred conclusion isn’t sound methodology. :/
LikeLiked by 2 people