We are going to go pave Afghanistan with the blood and bones of Canadian soldiers; will the nebulous goal of “stability” be sufficient to pacify their families as they grieve? Will the inevitable deaths of innocent Afghanis be justified by bringing stability to the region? Consider the very nature of the war in Afghanistan where there are only a few “front lines” and the enemy has the capacity to strike anywhere at almost anytime. Is this what we bring and justify our presence in Afghanistan for?
“Coalition forces in Afghanistan will go on the offensive this fall, says Lt.-Gen. Marc Lessard, the commander of Canadian troops overseas.
His comments to reporters in Kandahar on Saturday echoed those made by British Maj.-Gen. Nick Carter, commander of coalition troops in southern Afghanistan, who said up to 32,000 Afghan and coalition soldiers will try to clear 500 to 800 insurgents from around Kandahar city before December.
Lessard described the coalition push as “massive activities.” The attacks will be followed by development projects and efforts to strengthen the local governments.”
We have heard this so many times over the tenure of our stay in Afghanistan. But better to have nebulous strategy to match our nebulous goals, one would suppose.
“He [Lessard] said the Taliban had taken the initiative over the summer and it had been “a tough go” for the coalition. “There was a lot more enemy presence and a lot more activity.”
The coalition consolidated its position, Lessard said. “There was no more expansion. We didn’t have the troops.”
But now the Taliban initiative has been stopped. “That’s good, but that’s not good enough,” he said, so the coalition is taking the offensive.”
And re-win the hearts and minds of the people? Who do you side with if you are an Afghani citizen? The corrupt Kharzi regime backed by imperial powers that will be leaving the country soon or with the Taliban who will be there with certainty (being that it is their country after all)?
“With the 150-plus killed, the hundreds of seriously injured, from our Canadian point of view, that’s our legacy.”
Poignant and prescient words from Lieutenant-General Marc Lessard. I’m usually happy when blog posts write themselves, but in this instance, there is nothing to cheer about.
Moe over at Whatever Works has a great post about Afghanistan and the morass that passes as the status quo.




7 comments
September 14, 2010 at 8:46 am
Moe
People paid attention to Vietnam and demanded an end to that obscene war (even though it took over a decade) because we had universal service and everyone – no matter their status – was affected.
Today, with a professional military class – not just the troops but their families too – the reality of war is kept far away from the rest of us. The 24-hour ‘news’ machine spends about ten minutes a day on Afghanistan, if that. After all, there are much greater threats to our liberty, like community centers in lower Manhattan. (did you know there had been a mosque inside the Twin Towers?)
LikeLike
September 14, 2010 at 10:43 am
The Arbourist
Do we need another general draft to galvanize the peace movement again? I’m thinking once democratic/republican hawks have to sacrifice themselves or their children to the meat-grinder of war, attitudes would change. A general draft might be just the ticket as then those in power would have to risk exposing themselves and their dealings to the public as they ‘artfully avoided’ the draft by using their power and wealth. It could raise class consciousness a great deal.
Having a professional army of the poor and disadvantaged allows a certain separation or even compartmentalization of war and its bevy of negative consequences on the public mind and discourse.
An interesting thought experiment, but better to avoid needing a large professional army in the first place. That would start with divorcing the idea of American exceptionalism from US foreign policy. I do not forsee that happening anytime soon.
LikeLike
September 14, 2010 at 10:56 am
Moe
Arb – we absolutely need to restore the draft. Without it, the military becomes a subculture of the like minded, easier to manipulate than an army made up of citizens.
Part of the post WWII dynamic happened because men of all different classes, levels of education, ethnicity, even race, fought together. Their shared experience when brought home made for a much more cohesive ‘people’. It was also a shared sacrifice at home. We cooperated. We went to the moon. We built the greatest university system the world had ever seen.
As long as we must have armies (and sorry, but I don’t see that going away anytime soon), they should be citizen armies.
Instead we have Sarah Palin.
LikeLike
September 14, 2010 at 12:25 pm
The Canadian Armed Forces in Afghanistan – Fall Offensive. « Dead … | Afghanistan Today
[…] grieve? Will the inevitable deaths of innocent Afghanis be justified … The rest is here: The Canadian Armed Forces in Afghanistan – Fall Offensive. « Dead … Share and […]
LikeLike
October 5, 2010 at 4:17 pm
Vern R. Kaine
http://www.hbo.com/documentaries/my-trip-to-al-qaeda/index.html
I just watched this documentary on HBO. Very interesting and worth the watch, no matter which side of the issue(s) you are on.
There’s a comment on the documentary here: http://carnageandculture.blogspot.com/2010/09/looming-documentary-hbos-my-trip-to-al.html that I think summarizes it well, albeit a little cliche. “My Trip to Al-Qaeda is tough to watch, tougher to turn away from, and an invaluable aid to those who don’t understand the true nature of the enemy we all face.” (emphasis mine)
LikeLike
November 17, 2010 at 3:07 pm
MyForces
Thanks for the link to the documentary @Vern R. Kaine.
LikeLike
November 18, 2010 at 12:26 pm
Vern R. Kaine
You’re welcome. Hope you enjoy it (informatively) as much as I did.
LikeLike