The notion that the bible is the inerrant word of god is a joke. Try more like the ‘telephone game’ but using different languages and just saying no to clarity and connection to historical accuracy.
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Carney lays out security 'guardrails' for China as Canada looks to build up relationship
- Cancer screening. Vaccine wariness. Family doctors. Our watch list for health stories in 2026
- ‘The Nazis were right:’ What the leaders of Canada’s biggest ‘nationalist’ group really want
- Why a N.S. assault case before Canada’s top court could set a precedent for Indigenous sentencing options
- The busiest travel days of the year are here — but will it be calm or chaos?
- From Marty Supreme to Montreal, My Beautiful: The top 25 movies of 2025
- Epstein files: The 1st tranche of documents have been released. Here's what we've learned
- Military espionage case started with claims that Postmedia journalist is linked to Russia: sources
- U.S. launches 'vengeance' strikes against ISIS targets in Syria, Hegseth says
- CBC photojournalists reveal their most compelling images of 2025
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
5 comments
June 1, 2014 at 9:50 am
john zande
Seven minutes and forty-seven seconds of awesome.
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 9:53 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
I was kind of thinking that this was your cup of tea. :>
OT: Have you slapped Richard silly yet for his abuse of coherency and rambling wall o’ texts stream of consciousness horse-pucky?
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:10 am
myatheistlife
Well, there you have it. A coherent explanation of the Christian holy texts. That’s not something you’ll get from a believer though. Merikans think Jesus was white and spoke English because the King James bible is god’s innerant word. They profess fondness for their NT but few of them really read it. Ever sit in on a Sunday sermon? Half of them jump from book to book picking up just a verse or two each time so they can create the lesson they want rather than stick to the script on the pages. I don’t mean contrasting the same story as written in the four gospels, I mean jumping OT to NT and all over as if the books were written to contain some coherent thought across the hundreds of years it took to write them. You might as well call Dan Brown a prophet, at least his story was tightly woven and ‘seemed’ coherent.
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:14 am
The Arbourist
@MAL
LOL :)
All hail Dan Brown!
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:23 am
john zande
He’s beyond hope, but i’m loving your exchanges :)
LikeLike