Why are drugs still illegal? I wrote a while ago about the success of Portugal, where all drugs were legalized, and the money previously used to enforce drug laws were instead used to fund social programs to help those with drug problems. Not only was Portugal’s drug abuse problem significantly reduced, but HIV and crime rates plummeted as well. It has been almost 15 years since Portugal started their non-prohibition experiment, with revolutionary results, and yet other countries still refuse to let go of their self-defeating War on Drugs.
I have recently read a fantastic interview with Johann Hari, on Sam Harris’ blog. Hari is a highly experienced and accredited journalist who has travelled the globe researching and writing a book on the War on Drugs, its history, and it’s effects on societies. While a good portion of the interview elaborated many of the points I was already familiar with, there was a massive amount of information that I had no previous notion of. For instance, while it is quite apparent that racism plays a big role in drugs issues today, I had no idea that racism played such a huge part in the War on Drugs’ inception. There are further insights that extend far beyond drug addiction as well. Hari also focuses quite a bit on individual stories, bringing a painfully absent human element to the discussion. It certainly provides a lot to think about. Here are a few excerpts, but I highly recommend reading the entire interview.
“Harry Anslinger was probably the most influential person that no one’s ever heard of. He took over the Department of Prohibition just as alcohol prohibition was ending … he was driven by two intense hatreds: One was a hatred of addicts, and the other was a hatred of African Americans…He was regarded as an extreme racist by the racists of the 1930s. This is a guy who used the “N” word in official memos so often that his own senator said he should have to resign.”
“But if you had said to me four years ago, “What causes, say, heroin addiction?” I would have looked at you as if you were a bit simpleminded, and I would have said, “Heroin causes heroin addiction.”
For 100 years we’ve been told a story about addiction that’s just become part of our common sense. It’s obvious to us. We think that if you, I, and the first 20 people to read this on your site all used heroin together for 20 days, on day 21 we would be heroin addicts, because there are chemical hooks in heroin that our bodies would start to physically need, and that’s what addiction is.
The first thing that alerted me to what’s not right about this story is when I learned that if you step out onto the street and are hit by a car and break your hip, you’ll be taken to a hospital where it’s quite likely that you’ll be given a lot of diamorphine. Diamorphine is heroin. It’s much more potent than what you get on the street, because it’s medically pure, not f***ed up by dealers. You’ll be given that diamorphine for quite a long period of time. Anywhere in the developed world, people near you are being giving loads of heroin in hospitals now.
If what we think about addiction is right, what will happen? Some of those people will leave the hospital as heroin addicts. That doesn’t happen.”
“You and I have probably got enough money in the bank that we could spend the next year drinking vodka and never stop. We could just be drunk all the time. But we don’t. And the reason we don’t is not because someone’s stopping us but because we want to be present in our lives. We’ve got relationships. We’ve got friends. We’ve got people we love. We’ve got books we want to read. We’ve got books we want to write. We’ve got things we want to do. Most of addiction is about not wanting to be present in your life.
And by the way, that’s true not just of drug addiction. If you’ve ever known a gambling addict, you see that the pleasure he’s getting is not the pleasure of the specific bet. It’s the pleasure of not being present in his own life. It’s the pleasure of being taken out of himself, even to what I regard as a very squalid and depressing world. It’s the same with sex addiction. There’s a continuity between drug addictions and other addictions that I think tells you something fundamental.”
“We need to create a society where people are less isolated and distressed. There are places in the world where that exists: Addiction is very low in Sweden, because it’s a very connected society with very low levels of insecurity. We can learn from that.”
The War on Drugs is society shooting itself in the foot. The U.S has escalated the war to shooting itself in the kneecaps and Canada is looking to follow suit. We need to stop this before we end up aiming even higher.




14 comments
April 13, 2015 at 9:32 am
robert browning
Your excerpts had new info for me too. Government policy on this continues in the U.S. because it’s a good tool for our “police state” and an established channel to circulate money to politically connected, Blackwater type, contractors.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 10:40 am
VR Kaine
“Vice” on HBO did a pretty good story on this (Portugal). I’ll try and find the link. Also, to the racism point, a major push to gain support from the American public to ban cocaine was all the headlines about the Negro Cocaine Fiend.
http://www.thenation.com/article/178158/how-myth-negro-cocaine-fiend-helped-shape-american-drug-policy
There’s a lot of reasons why drugs could be fully legalized, but my concern is what that would mean with the lack of parenting that we have in our culture. Much more accessible, much easier to try, much easier to get hooked? I don’t buy that it’s simply who wants to be “present” in their lives that determines who gets hooked and who doesn’t. In my experience the best deterrents to keep a kid of drugs was to have him/her involved in sports or something where they’d want to be present, sure – however drugs and alcohol are still physically and chemically addictive to those who are predisposed, and regardless of how good someone’s life is a person can still get addicted to the high even if using recreationally. The drugs or alcohol become part of their daily life, not something they use to escape it.
Regardless, I don’t think enforcement should be the heavy-weighted solution. I believe it’s necessary, but I think too much effort and money has been put towards that side of the equation which has kept the drug lords, the government, and the for-profit health and corrections systems too happy for too long.
Jail doesn’t automatically ruin someone’s life, btw, but catchy poster. ;)
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 12:44 pm
Mystro
@robert browning
I would suggest that it has a lot more to do with people unable to give up on the notion that harsh punishment is the best/only deterrent for undesirable behaviour. There are many supporters of the War on Drugs who not only don’t profit from it, but are hurt by it.
I’m not saying there aren’t those who would abuse this misconception for personal gains, only that what we need to focus on is shifting how society looks at and deals with drug problems if we want things to get better.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 12:47 pm
Mystro
@VR Kaine
Hari mentioned the myth of the ‘Negro Cocaine Fiend’ as well in the interview. He described another big push to outlaw drugs where they wanted to come up with ‘legal’ excuse to harass Chinese Americans. The racism runs deep in the War on Drugs, to be sure.
“my concern is what that would mean with the lack of parenting that we have in our culture. Much more accessible, much easier to try, much easier to get hooked?”
As I wrote, it wouldn’t work to just legalize drugs. The shifting of funds to the much-cheaper-than-the-war-on-drugs social programs that help people deal with drug issues is key. Legalization and support reduces drug use. Prohibition doesn’t.
“I don’t buy that it’s simply who wants to be “present” in their lives that determines who gets hooked and who doesn’t. In my experience the best deterrents to keep a kid of drugs was to have him/her involved in sports or something”
I read that as ‘I disagree with you, but I agree with you’.
“drugs and alcohol are still physically and chemically addictive”
No one said they weren’t. Indeed, this point is addressed specifically in the interview. The evidence shows, however, that these chemical hooks aren’t nearly as important to society’s drug issues as other factors. So by addressing the larger issues of an addict’s life, one reduces the hold that those chemical hooks have on them. Just because this isn’t a magical 100% fix-all solution, it doesn’t take from the fact that it is a vastly, hugely, I can’t say it enoughly, superior way of handling addictions. Nor does it negate how horrendously poor criminalization is at dealing with these issues.
” I don’t think enforcement should be the heavy-weighted solution. I believe it’s necessary”
Why is it necessary? It feeds organizations that are detrimental to our society. It saps massive amount of resources. It is beyond ineffective in that it makes drug problems worse. I see no redeeming quality or essential function of criminalization.
“Jail doesn’t automatically ruin someone’s life”
More of ‘the exception disproves the rule’? It’s a poster. Generalizing and simplifying messages is what posters do. That’s why we have posts, articles, interviews, books, research, and other more detailed works to flesh out particulars and nuances. Like, for instance, my post that the poster is attached to and the interview that my post is featuring.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 1:45 pm
bleatmop
One of the most frustrating parts of the criminalization of these substances is that in the ER very few people are willing to admit to taking these substances, even when it’s to the determent of their own health. I’ve had several mid 20’s persons having cocaine induced heart attacks that will not admit to taking cocaine for fear that we will put it on their medical record and that the police will then get their medical record and then charge them with drug related charges. Long story short, their lack of being forthright with us delays their definitive treatment and causes them to have a larger infarct than what would have been (if any infarct at all).
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 3:14 pm
Mystro
@bleatmop
A few of the eye-openers in the interview consisted of indirect ways that the criminalization of drug use made things much worse that I had never thought of before. But certainly, fear of getting help is a big part of the perpetuation and magnification of drug problems.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 3:21 pm
VR Kaine
@Mystro,
Agreed on the racism vs. drug war. Chinese, too?
Guilty here of not reading the entire interview, sorry. I was challenging the “won’t get hooked” argument as being over-simplistic in the post, but I imagine the author’s position is not that simplistic if he’s researching, studying, and writing a book on it. The escapism vs. presence angle of it is interesting regardless.
As for the poster, that was a bit of a tongue-in-cheek comment which I attempted to identify with the winky thingy at the end. A small ribbing, perhaps, but I was going to add, “Drugs will ruin your life so if I catch you with them I’ll send you to jail… where you can get a whole bunch more of them!” after my comment to qualify it, but I had to run.
If you haven’t checked out VICE on HBO, I’d recommend it. Reporting goes deep and is hard-hitting, and a fellow Canadian is at the helm.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 3:27 pm
jasonjshaw
And the most ironic part of it is how Christianity puts an emphasis on forgiveness, helping and teaching (not prosecuting and judging harshly) while the predominantly Christian USA has taken the polar opposite route on this issue. It disappoints me that so many here in Canada have fallen into the same troublesome way of thinking.
Hopefully more people will continue to understand and share this sort of information so that knowledge can prevail over propaganda.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Mystro
@VR Kaine
“Chinese, too?”
Yup. In California they tried to force the Chinese Americans out of the city proper. They had to go all the way to the Supreme Court before finally the ruling came down that you couldn’t evict someone just because they were Chinese. So the authorities figured they’d outlaw Chinese opium dens, so they could “justifiably” terrorize minorities.
I’ll see what I can do about finding that VICE show you mentioned, but I don’t have HBO. It does sound interesting though. In the meantime, Arb has lent me the book “In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts” by Gabor Mate MD. It’s on addictions in general and looks to provide a pretty in depth look at how genetic disposition has much less to do with a person’s struggle with addiction than society likes to think.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 3:56 pm
VR Kaine
I’ll check the book out, Mystro. Not to get into some of the circles I used to be in, but there were those who could kick a habit and those who got hooked with everything else – happiness, success, income, etc. being the same, so anything that would help explain more who’d get hooked and who wouldn’t would be helpful, even if now just for my own curiosity (way out of that scene now). When I was younger a lot of the kids who were regular users at the time all grew out of it, so who knows.
As for HBO, I know they were moving to a freestanding Netflix-type model but I think Bell got in the way of it being offered up here in Canada. I think you can find a bunch of the episodes on YouTube if you don’t want to pick up the channel for a month.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 4:00 pm
Mystro
@jasonjshaw
The ability of religious people to engage in double think, like that which you described, is often terrifying.
“It disappoints me that so many here in Canada have fallen into the same troublesome way of thinking.”
I’ll see your disappointment and raise you equal parts anger and depression.
“Hopefully more people will continue to understand and share this sort of information so that knowledge can prevail over propaganda.”
And hopefully it doesn’t take too long.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 4:12 pm
Mystro
@VR Kaine
I’ll see what my Google-Fu can do to find which Vice episode you mean and if it’s on youtube.
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 4:16 pm
The Intransigent One
@VR Kaine – I just finished In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts and highly, highly recommend it. The author draws you in with stories of real people, and then has the writing ability to get you through the complicated neuroscience bits without putting you to sleep or making your head explode. It’s deeply insightful, highly informative, and profoundly moving.
<ed. Leaving links to The Introduction and Chapter one of In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts>
LikeLike
April 13, 2015 at 4:40 pm
VR Kaine
Thanks, IO. I’d definitely check it out as of course it’s a nature-vs-nurture argument of sorts and the psychology of it is intriguing to me. Thanks to you and Mystro for the steer.
Part of what has me interested in the “hooked” and choice argument is that I just watched “Happy Valley” at the request of a friend (think it’s free on YouTube) which talks about the prescription drug epidemic in Utah, especially with young teens.
In one scene they’re showing how the producers paid for three billboards for “free addiction assistance” and out of all the traffic that went by, only three adults showed up. The producer then shows his wife detoxing and going through rehab, and some other emotional healing that goes on. Likely not as gory as the Ghosts book, but interesting nonetheless. I had no idea that Utah outranked California, New York, and Florida in terms of overdoses (and apparently Jello consumption, it seems).
LikeLike