Books should never be banned; they are the life blood of an educated population. Yet banning books, specifically feminist books in The Vancouver Woman’s library is a priority for the group called Gays Against Gentrification. This sort of violent repression is a heinous crime against the notions of the promotion of rational discourse, civilized protest, and of course women and their liberty.
So… friends, let’s understand that if you decide to start banning books that are integral to the movement you want to be a part of, it is a really big hint that you need to be in your own fucking movement. Colonizing Feminism for your particular set needs is going to fail; therefore it is time to take wing and make a movement that really can be all about you, because, Dear Transactivists/queer ideologues/men etc. :
Feminism. Is. Not. All. About. You.
Erasing ‘heretical’ female texts and thus female experience isn’t what is expected of feminists or their allies – is this your #notmytrans movement moment? (Too fucking late for that now, the jackboots are already in motion in Vancouver.) – yet this is the shit move (banning feminist books in a library for Women) undertaken by the queer group GAG. (see the entire petition on Facebook here). Are you feeling the inclusive love from this group that is dictating what females are allowed to read? I know I certainly am.
Let’s follow Charles Rae in his article on The Fifth Column as she describes the situation –
” This has got to be the first time a library was accused of violence. In an interesting display of the blooming neoliberal tendency to turn the world into their self-defined “safe space,” an organization ironically called GAG (Gays Against Gentrification) has demanded the new Vancouver Women’s Library (VWL) ban books written by women. Feminist Mary Lunetta already created a petition in favor of freedom of thought, urging VWL not to ban any books.
The trend of the neoliberal left controlling and condemning thoughts and words is widespread, and damages the movements they are attempting to protect. In this particular example as a case study, GAG came out of the gate demanding an outright ban of women’s books instead of asking for a respectful dialog. But then, what would this dialog consist of? What books (and therefore thoughts) are allowed? Anyone who champions freedom of thought wouldn’t entertain such a debate, and women shouldn’t be demanded to comply to such restrictions.”
Follow the link to the petition and sign it. Better yet, go to the Vancouver Women’s Library website and donate to them.
“These demands presume feminism, and women, are or should be completely monolithic. That everyone should already implicitly and entirely understand their ideal of accepted language and thought. If you don’t know or accept their concepts, there is no conversation to be had. You are a bigot, and you should get out (like the books).”
How about NO. The sifting sands of your ideology serve only to reinforce the patriarchal conception of gender. No one should take a knee to such a corrosive ideology which, essentially, is the antithesis of radical feminist theory and praxis.
“The reasoning presented in their introductory paragraph is because “the ongoing violence against trans women, sex workers, and IBPOC (Indigenous, Black, and People of Colour),” and as was quoted, “settler-colonial violence”. But what connection a Women’s Library has to the violence anyone anywhere faces remains to be seen, and is not detailed in their demands. As seasoned feminists know and center in their messaging, violence is perpetrated (in a large majority) by men. Furthermore, violent males aren’t taking their cues from women’s books and libraries.“
Harassing libraries is easy, fixing male-violence isn’t. Looks like its coming up harassing libraries all across the board, because actually being an ally and working with women is too fucking hard.
“GAG goes on to say that “TERF”s and “SWERF”s are complicit in violence and liken them to Nazis. How long have feminist been called Feminazis? Where was the Holocaust perpetrated by “cis white women”? One of the SWERFy books they want banned is called Not a Choice, Not a Job: Exposing the Myths about Prostitution and the Global Sex Trade by Janice Raymond. Doesn’t that sound more like a book which exposes violence rather than perpetrates it? I’m going to have to give it a read.”
Men do need access to prostituted women after all. Definitely should be a priority for Feminists amirite?
“GAG’s attempt to give proof of violence was to call out women who stand in opposition to the sex industry, and the particular exclusion of a male who identifies as a woman into a woman-only space. Their demands to silence women are ill-founded at best, harmful to the women’s movement at worst, and ironic on all accounts. GAG says they will not sit down with the women of the VWL for discussion because they claim they are being gaslit– as they call women nazis and violent without a shred of hard evidence of physical violence. “
Typical male supremacist behaviour. Sorry folks, you can’t identify out of being part of the oppressor class, and shit like the GAG list of demands to silence women only proves that point.
“Furthermore, the books and ideas they are looking to ban are ones that are still under debate within the feminist community, such as the example of the sex industry, and whether it should be abolished or embraced. These demands are an attempt to control this ongoing dialog, as well as the outcome of it. Any kind of a book ban would, without a doubt, hinder feminist movements. Feminists, all movements with all ideologies, would be strengthened by robust debate and spaces of free thought, something libraries stand for, and something women have been denied time and again since men took the mantle as head of the home and state.”
Yep. What Charles said. My conclusion would have had more swears in it, but Charles sums up the situation nicely.
Stay Tuned, I’ll have the feminist books to be banned list up in a jiff.
**UPDATE** – Queer Transactivst Group Vandalizes Library
**UPDATE** – Video of dudes and handmaidens at the Library.



18 comments
February 5, 2017 at 12:53 pm
roughseasinthemed
They misse Greer and Beauvoir off the list btw.
LikeLike
February 5, 2017 at 12:55 pm
Miep
C. Rae is a woman.
Thanks for the post, just donated to the Library at their site.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 5, 2017 at 1:04 pm
The Arbourist
@Miep
I followed the name on the byline. I’m not sure what an appropriate change would be?
I’ve signed the petition and in the process of making a donation to the library. I’m not a big fan of paypal, but it is worth it in this situation.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 5, 2017 at 1:05 pm
The Arbourist
@RSitM
I’m surprised they wouldn’t mention Beauvoir. I mean if they’re going after foundational texts like Gyn’Ecology, why not ban them all?
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 1:06 pm
Miep
I just happen to be personally acquainted with her. No way you could know.
Paypal has its uses, but I would not recommend keeping the majority of your funds where it can get at them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 1:08 pm
The Arbourist
@Miep
Thank you for the advice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 1:09 pm
roughseasinthemed
Don’t know what they’re talking about? Oh silly silly woman! How dare I.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 1:13 pm
The Arbourist
@RSitM
This book banning malarkey has really struck a chord. It is just so terribly, terribly wrong.
You know, its okay if you have a different ideology (even if doesn’t make sense) but to go after some of foundational texts of feminism and have them removed so other people can’t see them is just wrong on every level.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 5, 2017 at 1:21 pm
roughseasinthemed
Arb, calling to ban feminist books is evil, evil.
As, Miep says, is paypal. I have minimal money in there, purely from some trifling payments. I won’t accept payment via PP.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 1:23 pm
Miep
They’re a library. They must have a mailing address.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 5, 2017 at 9:44 pm
Karla Gjini
It’s so disheartening, this silencing of women.
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 5, 2017 at 9:46 pm
Miep
It’s infuriating and scary.
LikeLiked by 3 people
February 5, 2017 at 9:51 pm
Karla Gjini
this too.. and it’s hard to move beyond frustration and into actionable anger when your energy is sapped trying to have rational conversations about gender and sex
LikeLiked by 5 people
February 7, 2017 at 10:04 pm
shraika
Email
hello@vancouverwomenslibrary.ca
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 8, 2017 at 12:18 am
tnt666
Charlie’s account has been shut down by Facebook, this adds up to dozens of women who have been shut down by Facebook, for denouncing threats of male violence. She copied a message from her inbox for the world to see, to expose the male violence within… and instead of banning the males, it is the women who get banned. As usual.
This has happened too many times, we have to find a way to shift the balance of power in FB. Surely there must be a rational person in there somewhere who has not drank the koolaid… or in modern parlance, has not been suckered by #alternativefacts or #alternatefacts !
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 8, 2017 at 12:30 am
tnt666
As for “going too far”… It’s been “too far” since Kimberley Nixon dragged the Vancouver Rape Relief Shelter through the court system for over a decade.
It’s been “too far” since MALE Fallon Fox was given license to beat up females in an MMA arena.
It was “too far” when they convinced gay organisations to move AGAINST a lesbian music festival. I
t’s been “too far” since feminists around the planet have been no-platformed, in media and on campuses, for talking about biology.
There have been so many “too far”, one is left shaking our heads at what the fuck happened to the supposed leftist activists. I never expected any better from the right, but this has awakened me to the equally deep-seeded misogyny of the supposed left.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 8, 2017 at 12:30 am
Miep
My current theory is that moderating Facebook is such a horrible experience, what with all the vile stuff that must be tucked away in there, that any admin with a shred of decency burns out fast and finds another gig, and we get left with the dregs.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2017 at 8:22 am
Vancouver Women’s Library Vandalized – The Violent Trans/Queer Lobby in Action | Dead Wild Roses
[…] activism changed to mean defiling and destroying women’s spaces, but unsurprisingly, the violent men of Queer activism (terrorism) are at it again. And quite honestly, they (GAG) can fuck the hell right off – violent patriarchal […]
LikeLike