The US has a funny notion of what is in its ‘backyard’. It would be really wonderful if the citizens of the US would decry the economic terrorism being carried out on their behalf.
“The success of Chávez and Maduro’s governments in reducing poverty and inequality in Venezuela and their ability to lend aid to working people around the world pose a direct threat to the United States’ agenda. During the 14 years of Chávez’s presidency, the country experienced an average of 3.2 percent economic growth, increasing to 4.1 percent after Chávez took control of the state oil company, PDVSA, in 2004. The profits from the oil sector have been used to bolster social programs in areas such as housing, health, and education.
Programs such as the Comité Local de Abastecimiento y Producción (CLAP) and Plan de Atención a la Vulnerabilidad Nutricional provide 50,000 tons of food per month to 6 million Venezuelan families (compared to the measly 60 tons that could be purchased with the $20 million of aid offered by the United States). According to Mark Weisbrot and Luis Sandoval of the Center for Economic and Policy Research and other sources, inequality has decreased substantially compared to the pre-Chávez era.
It is true that Venezuela today is experiencing an economic crisis. But it is important to put the current reality in context with the pre-Chávez neoliberal era—which failed to provide basic services to the Venezuelan people even without the staunch opposition of the United States and its allies—and in the context of crushing economic sanctions and an economic war that has systematically denied the country access to credit and repeatedly staged a series of economic and political interventions.
Today, the U.S.-imposed sanctions alone cost Venezuela an estimated US$30 million per day. Under pressure from the U.S., the Bank of England has denied Venezuela access to $1.2 billion of gold stored there—money that could be used to provide medicine and aid to the Venezuelan people. While painting a picture of Maduro as a heartless dictator who refuses to provide aid to his people, the U.S. is simultaneously lobbying the Bank of England to deny Maduro access to crucial funds and instead turn Venezuela’s gold over to Guaidó.
Meanwhile, the United States has stationed military planes on the Colombian border carrying US$20 million worth of so-called humanitarian aid. Maduro, recognizing the history of humanitarianism as a trojan horse for intervention and the political motives behind the U.S.’s offer, has denied the aid. Even the United Nations and the Red Cross have refused to support the U.S. aid shipment, which they accuse of being politically motivated. In other words, if one is to take a step back and look at the bigger picture of the crisis in Venezuela, the missteps of Maduro’s administration pale in comparison to the impact of U.S. economic warfare.
In stark contrast to the United States’ foreign relations and stance on international aid, Venezuela has used its natural wealth to provide aid to working people around the world and to fund social programs domestically. In doing this, the country has set an example for what is possible if countries under the current grip of U.S. imperialist policies set out to stop the bleeding of their resources and wealth into the coffers of the United States and its allies and instead use their resources for the good of everyday people. It is an attempt toward what the late Egyptian Marxist Samir Amin would call “de-linking,” or “compelling imperialism to accept your conditions or part of those conditions [… and] to drive one’s own policy.”
4 comments
March 5, 2019 at 6:53 am
Bob Browning
I’ve followed Venezuela’s story in real time for 20 years and have seen all the info in your article from many sources but virtually none of this is shown by corporate media.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2019 at 9:46 am
The Arbourist
It would spark discussion of elite priorities in the public sphere. And that is clearly unacceptable.
LikeLike
March 5, 2019 at 1:27 pm
Bill Malcolm
Funny how the Democrats and Republicans come together to take down Venezuela. Nobody’s dissing Trump on this issue, they’re all slavering for a spot of free oil and the destruction of “socialism”. The neocon War Party did in Libya under Hillary as Seckerterry of State, with a smidgin of help from Canada, Germany and France who went in first with jet fighters for target practice and to cement their ally relationship with the USA. And the Repubs were on board because of oil – Libya has been in utter chaos ever since.
Canada’s Foreign Affairs Dept has been anti-Venezuela since at least 2002; we’re talking diplomat level public servants, part of what we call the bureaucratic elite in the USA, the institutional memory that carries policy over changes in party and President. We’ve been at this game ourselves, completely unbeknownst to the man on the street:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2019/03/understanding-how-canadian-diplomats-shape-the-news/
It is Canadian business interests that got Trudeau and the neocon Freeland to set up the Lima Group against Venezuela. She happily chaired a meeting last week. Deliberately oblivious of the points raised in the great article you repeat above, unreality about “illegitimate dictator” and “human rights abuses”, “illegal elections”, apparently Canada would like to stamp Venezuela to the ground as well. Why? It’s illogical unless higher forces are impelling our “leaders”. Corporate mining interests. The non-white population was getting uppity with them 20 years ago, just like those pesky First Nations at home. It’s a white man/woman’s world.
https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/progressive-trudeau-government-attacks-venezuela
and
https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/canada-us-coup-venezuela
Finally, best or “worst” of all, this article. All these appeared on ProgBlog, but many didn’t bother to read.
https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/corporate-canada-behind-slow-motion-coup-attempt-in-venezuela
Sickening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2019 at 8:46 am
The Arbourist
@Bill Malcom
Stuff like this is why I’m still sorta pissed off at Jack Layton for dying before he could take a legitimate shot at holding the reigns of power.
I’m sure he would have bollocked things up royally, but maybe in a way that did not centre the needs of unaccountable corporations, and rather, would be responsive to the people of Canada.
LikeLike