The terms ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusivity’ get thrown around quite a bit these days. I think it is important to note that as of late these concepts are becoming more of gatekeeping ritual than anything else. Quashing and silencing critical opinion in the name of diversity is chillingly ironic, but it is happening and the latest example is in Vancouver with their Pride Committee. I applaud David Cavey and his decision not to attend pride due to the totalitarian stance they are taking toward the Vancouver Public Library. Vancouver pride actively tears at the laws and practices that have allowed events like Pride to actualize, I imagine because ideological purity is more important than the base principles of a free and democratic society.
What was the Vancouver Public Library’s crime? Hosting an event that featured Meghan Murphy as a speaker. Honestly, Vancouver Pride can take the expressway to ‘go fuck yourself’ at this point. If your ideology requires the silencing and deplatforming of feminist critics then exactly how strong and just are the arguments that support your cause? Not allowing your critics to speak is bullshit and is indicative , in my opinion, of an misogynistically incoherent set of beliefs.
In the Feminist Current Tonje Gjevjon writes:
“In Vancouver, federal Conservative candidate David Cavey announced he wouldn’t be marching in the city’s Pride parade this weekend after the Vancouver Pride Society (VPS) banned the University of British Columbia and the Vancouver Public Library from participating. Cavey has marched in the parade in the past, but took a stand in favour of free speech, challenging the VPS decision to ban UBC and the VPL for allowing speakers who challenge transgender ideology to book space for events. In a press release, Cavey stated:
“As publicly funded institutions, both are obligated to ‘host’ whomever wishes to rent their property — within the limits of the law. They don’t necessarily agree with the speakers. But to punish them for following their obligation to respect free speech, the exchange of ideas and intellectual freedom, is plainly wrong…
…We encourage other political leaders and campaigns to join us in taking a principled stand on behalf of UBC and the VPL on inclusiveness, free speech, intellectual freedom, and diversity of opinion and refuse to march in the parade unless its organizers reinstate these respected local institutions.”
He was promptly accused of “transphobia” by Nicola Spurling, a member of the BC Green Party.
When it comes to Pride, everyone is expected to join in, whether they want to or not.”
3 comments
August 8, 2019 at 8:27 am
john zande
So. Confusing.
Is that you in the pic?
LikeLike
August 8, 2019 at 10:33 am
The Arbourist
Oh heavens no. That is the politician in question from a different year. Years when Pride was not banning the library for attending because they hosted a feminist speaker.
LikeLiked by 1 person
August 8, 2019 at 12:53 pm
john zande
You commie revolutionary! ;)
LikeLiked by 1 person