Hey folks, it’s election time. Your MP has to pretend harder that they are listening the people they supposedly represent. Take the time and send this in. Courtesy of We The Females.
Dear <MP’s Name>
I am writing as a voter in your riding who supports human rights for all Canadians and with specific concerns about the impact of Bill C16 on women’s sex-based rights.
Bill C16 was enacted in Parliament in 2017 to amend the Canadian Human Rights Code and the Canadian Criminal Code in order to provide protection for the transgendered. Unfortunately, C16 does not explicitly protect transgendered individuals but instead protects “gender identity” and gender expression”, neither of which are given precise legal definitions but are instead subjective categories unlike biological sex.
Although sex remains as a separate protected characteristic, the enactment of Bill C16 has led to a massive conflation of sex and gender identity/expression (many women have found that to even discuss their sex based rights as separately protected from gender identity and gender expression leads to accusations of transphobia and bigotry) with the result that, currently in Canada, a women’s status is no longer based in objective biology but on a subjective “gender identity” and/or “gender expression”.
This is misogynistic and continues to have profound implications for women’s’ sex-based rights including the right to sex segregated spaces and activities including prisons, abuse and rape crisis centres, elder care facilities and sports and athletic opportunities.
Brief examples regarding Statistics Canada and the Correctional Service of Canada follow:
Statistics Canada
As a direct result of C16, Statistics Canada “has revised the variable “sex of a person” as well as creating a new variable “gender of a person”.
This means that but for an extremely limited purpose, data collection and analysis from Stats Canada is based on the “gender of a person” not their biological sex.
One of the most egregious examples of this obfuscation is that universal crime statistics in Canada are no longer collected based on sex but instead on gender identity. This has been confirmed by the Canadian Association of Police Chiefs and now results in crime committed by biological males who identify as transgendered falsely being recorded as committed by female Canadians.
Changes such as these also lead directly to wrongheaded policies like the recent announcement by OPP that they will no longer publicly report the sex or gender of either perpetrators of crimes or their victims. All at a time when violence against biological women is epidemic in Canada!
Corrections Canada
On January 9, 2017 Corrections Canada announced a policy for transgender inmates detailing that: “Pre-operative male to female offenders with gender dysphoria will be held in men’s institutions and pre-operative female to male offenders with gender dysphoria will be held in women’s institutions”. This policy was abruptly reversed only days later, on January 13th, 2017, following an off the cuff comment by Justin Trudeau at a town hall. As a result, biologically male inmates (both post and pre-operative) are being housed in female facilities, some with mother/child units.
In response to an ATIP, Corrections Canada has advised that between June 1, 2017 and December 3, 2018, 8 biological males who identify as transgendered were transferred to the women’s system. 7 of the 8 were convicted of violent crimes including murder and sexual assault. The total population of transgendered males in female facilities remains unknown.
Female inmates (who are disproportionally aboriginal, have previously been subjected to violence/abuse and are overwhelmingly convicted of nonviolent crimes) are being housed with male transgendered inmates such as:
-
Madilyn (formerly Matthew) Harks who was convicted of sexually assaulting girls under the age of eight three times and has been accused of harassment and assaulting female inmates while in custody. Current location unknown but thought to be held at the Fraser Valley Women’s Institute which contains a mother and child unit
-
Tara Desousa (formerly Adam Labucan), a dangerous offender convicted of sexually assaulting a three-month-old baby. While in custody, Desousa assaulted female inmates and a female correctional officer. Currently held at the Fraser Valley Women’s Institute which contains a mother and child unit
With the information I have provided in mind, please let me know your thoughts and position on the points below. Your response will be a very important consideration in my choice of candidate on October 21:
-
What is your position on women sex based human rights as separate from gender identity/expression?
-
Do you support the rights of women to organize, provide and receive services based on biological sex as separate from gender identity/expression?
-
Do you support the collection of date for social statistics programs (including crime stats) based on biological sex as separate from gender identity/expression?
-
What specific steps will you take to support and promote women’s sex-based rights including the right to organize, provide and receive services as separate from gender identity/expression?
Thank-you for earliest response,
<Your Name>
9 comments
October 15, 2019 at 2:16 pm
Carmen
Done. . .we have a new one and I just met him about a month ago; we’ll see what he has to say. . .
LikeLiked by 2 people
October 15, 2019 at 2:37 pm
The Arbourist
Thank you Carmen. 😀
LikeLike
October 20, 2019 at 10:30 am
xx
I sent this to ALL the candidates in my area, save the PPC. Only The Libertarians and The Conservatives replied. The Libertarians replied the same day and answered all the questions. I don’t agree with their platform at all but I appreciate that they took the time to read and respond to someone who could vote for them. The Conservative MP replied but did not answer any of the questions. He apparently is Pro C16.
What on Earth is happening to the world when the bare minimum requirement which is listening to the people who you are sworn to represent is too much of a hassle.
I will vote tomorrow but the options are all bad.
LikeLike
October 20, 2019 at 10:50 am
The Arbourist
Roughly the same in my riding, pols are afraid of the woke lobby. 🙄😞
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 20, 2019 at 2:28 pm
Carmen
I sent my letter four days ago. I had met him, so I wanted to establish that I am an engaged and informed constituent. I have not heard a word from him and I am thinking that he’s either 1) studying/reflecting on the letter (it was lengthy) or 2) he’s ignoring it because he figures he’s going to lose to the Conservative candidate. Any correspondence I had with his predecessor was always answered immediately. This guy is young and very new to the political arena. I suspect he has absolutely no idea what to say to me and – quite possibly – is extremely intimidated.
If the Conservative fellow gets in on Monday, I’ll be contacting him immediately.
LikeLiked by 2 people
October 21, 2019 at 7:22 am
xx
Little update:
The Green Party candidate replied this morning. She essentially said that as in line with the Green Party policy she supports all Canadians to have the right to define and express themselves …
But then went on to explain that she appreciated the thought out examples and information in the letter.
Quotes from the letter below
”
I will look into the information you sent me in further detail as there is a lot to understand and learn about this issue. I want you to know that I take this very seriously. Your message will help me contribute to policies that are more fair, respectful and inclusive of everyone. Our legislation needs to be based on the latest research and consultation of Canadians – and your message supports that.
Again, I appreciate you taking the time to send me your message and I am always open to hearing from you.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 22, 2019 at 6:49 am
The Arbourist
Wow, so amazed/ proud of my fellow Canadians for getting this message to the political class. At least some might take the time to get informed on issues that affect women. No word from my MP.
LikeLike
October 22, 2019 at 6:55 am
Carmen
As I suspected, the Liberal candidate lost in our riding (although it was a close race). I’ll be sending the letter to the Conservative MP when I get back home. . . (I’m in Ontario just now). We’ll see what he has to say. ;)
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 22, 2019 at 9:13 am
The Arbourist
@Carmen
Thanks Carmen, this is really next step material. Talking about politics is one thing, actually doing something to change it is quite another. :)
LikeLike