Cultural constructs are subject to change. The swirling vortex of negativity and disruption caused by the idea of ‘being trans’ is long overdue for an overhaul. Go read the rest of
‘s article on her substack.“It matters because if we were to really, really understand that our 21st century Western version of “being trans” is something we made up culturally, the rest of the debates on this topic fall away into nonsense.
For example, at what age can someone decide to remove their healthy breasts? At no age, really, should society sanction surgery — and the complications and consequences of it — for removing healthy body parts for no medical reason. It’s stupid, it’s unethical, it doesn’t solve a medical problem, and it creates medical problems in a certain number of people who have the surgery. There’s no value to it.
Another example: If “being trans” is a cultural creation, in what cases do we give really powerful, medically disruptive drugs to stop puberty in otherwise healthy adolescents? Duh, never.
If people are deeply distressed by their bodies, what should we offer them? We should offer them compassion, mental health services, support groups. We shouldn’t offer them “affirmation” that something is indeed wrong with them that needs to be fixed, because that’s simply false.
The outcome for gender noncomforming people is vastly different in a cultural context in which society treats them as if they’re A-ok and perfectly accepted and emotionally healthy and can be who they are (traditional Samoa) and a cultural context in which society treats them as if there’s something wrong that needs to be fixed or else they’ll kill themselves (21st century West).
The result in traditional Samoa was happy, functional people. The result in the 21st century West is miserable, fragile (and increasingly medically and emotionally damaged) people. Which outcome is better?
We completely, completely created this phenomenon of “being trans.” We can un-create it.”
3 comments
October 15, 2022 at 4:30 pm
Cynthia Wolff
As I’ve thought to myself (and, have said to people in just daily conversation) many-a-time: A LOT of “trans”, once you peel away the clown show costuming of it, IS REALLY soooo literally-beholden to *organized RELIGIOUS constructs* demanding the social “roles” of male and female CONFORM to them. THAT is why it is a movement unabashedly riddled with the same-old patriarchal ordered misogyny as well as such flagrant homophobia. Nothing is rebellious or edgy at. all. about. it. (mental conditions aside: the person practicing it looks like they have the sophistry of someone that would’ve been indoctrinated with Creationism in a 1920s American textbook!).
Another point I’d add, and sorry for bringing up the “U.S.-centric angle”(!) in all this mess AGAIN, is that: when one looks at the changing/crumbling place of the U.S. in the World now, this doubling-down the entrenched mindset of the System is using to try to pound its chest and rearrange the Titanic’s deck chairs over (whether, re: rollback of Roe/disgusting legal attack on Title IX/exposé on the Epstein-Maxwell thing/corruption abuse by USA Gymnastics/you-name-it etc.) — IS ALL PART OF THE SAME STORY I FEEL. No matter how much an outsider may think America is this extremely liberal live-and-let-live place (which today, in my opinion, is NOT “liberal” one bit and is just self-destructive vicious nihilism commodified): the Puritan roots of the Old Boys’ Network are as toxic thesedays as I’ve *ever* seen in my adult lifetime.
LikeLike
October 16, 2022 at 11:06 am
The Arbourist
@Cynthia Wolff
The parallels between traditional religion and the new gender religion are quite clear. Both are dogmatic, self contained systems of belief that fly in the face of the material reality we all share. They both seek new members through cult grooming techniques and have no time for the heretical few that escape their clutches.
It’s just that this religion comes from the left and is somehow branded ‘progressive’ and gets a pass from most skeptical people on the left. It is such an odd phenomena.
LikeLike
October 16, 2022 at 4:45 pm
Cynthia Wolff
Yes, @thearbourist, the “Left”-wing rubber stamped delusion part of it is puzzling(?); however, I honestly feel: when you consider the way THE INTERNET has *realllyyy* served as an echo chamber for spreading this ideology truly like a contagion (while it coincided with those born in the mid-’90s, basically, being “baby-sat online”; beginning once they probably weren’t even 10 yet then, reached teen years when Facebook was the “big thing”), it was an example of a disastrous perfect storm. Unfortunately, it’s not so different from how people (especially in American society) let BigTech off-the-hook so much because it serves their consumer addiction so conveniently; therefore, they don’t see all the very creeping censorship of it as a “threat” to democratic redress.
The other two main demographics of this lunacy, whether they be the quack “doctors” profiting from nothing-short-of mutilating kids or the sociopathic adult men trying to inject sexually abusive paraphilias into civil society: are just (to me) flat-out criminals not. even. hiding. anymore. — said “civil society” HAS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO upholding the sex-based rights of women and the rights of minors protected against.
LikeLike