The Cass Review – Gender Identity is a Religious Belief.
April 13, 2024 in Canada, Gender Issues, Medicine | Tags: Cass Report, Gender Identity Religion, Stop Gender Quackery | by The Arbourist
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Epstein files: The 1st tranche of documents have been released. Here's what we've learned
- Military espionage case started with claims that Postmedia journalist is linked to Russia: sources
- U.S. launches 'vengeance' strikes against ISIS targets in Syria, Hegseth says
- CBC photojournalists reveal their most compelling images of 2025
- Officer shot as police respond to fence dispute in Welland, Ont., people urged to shelter in place
- CBC News: The National | Toronto man facing terrorism charges
- Alberta Next panel recommends referendums on immigration, leaving Canada Pension Plan
- Toronto man charged with terrorism, funding ISIS and attempted kidnappings
- Akwesasne parents outraged after photos circulate of 'time out box' in school
- How bad could this flu season get? Here are answers to your influenza questions
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
2 comments
April 13, 2024 at 9:33 am
tildeb
“Offering treatments without an adequate understanding of benefits and harms is unethical.”
There you go. This is the very simple, very clear message to EVERY medical professional using interventions and therapies for supposedly ‘treating’ gender incongruity in young people. But this message must also go out to those who pretend ‘gender care’ is medically approved and justified as if from evidence and who then act on this misguided belief as if it were true. It’s not.
If one endorses ‘gender’ treatment – in any and all venues like schools and courts and legislatures and all public institutions, in homes where children are being affirmed for denying biological reality – one is unethical. Stop doing this. Just stop. One’s selected pronouns preferences and beliefs do not alter reality and we have to collectively respect this brute fact.
LikeLiked by 2 people
April 13, 2024 at 9:59 am
tildeb
This report is just an extension of the court ruling made for a British case about the lack of informed consent for Kiera Bell rendered years ago: without an adequate understanding of benefits and harms about medical treatments offered by physicians, one cannot provide the necessary basis to justify ANY so-called consent by those receiving such treatments. Ipso facto. That’s why Bell won her case.
Our collective mistake is failing to recognize this fact. When it comes to treatments for gender affirming care, there cannot be informed consent. That’s why all of it is unethical. Every Last. Bit. No matter how righteous or kind or sympathetic or caring one thinks one is by doing so. All of it is unethical.
LikeLiked by 1 person