You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Social Science’ category.
Category Archive
Trauma, Stress, Addiction – Gabor Maté
March 19, 2015 in Social Science | Tags: Addiction, Biology, Dr.Gabor Mate, In the Realm of Hungy Ghosts, Stress | by The Arbourist | 3 comments
Reading Mate’s book called In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts. I’ve been unable to put this book down as his research and insight into addictions and associated behaviours dovetails snugly with the clientele I work with most days. Here is a brief excerpt from the chapter titled Trauma, Stress and the Biology of Addiction.
“Hardcore drug addicts, whose lives invariably began under conditions of severe stress, are all too readily triggered into a stress reaction. Not only does the stress response easily overwhelm the addict’s already challenged capacity for rational thought when emotionally aroused, but also the hormones of stress “cross-sensitize” with addictive substances. The more one is present, the more the other is craved. Addiction is a deeply ingrained response to stress, an attempt to cope with it through self-soothing. Maladaptive in the long term, it is highly effective in the short term.
Predictably, stress is a major cause of continued drug dependence. It increases opiate craving and use, enhances the reward efficacy of drugs and provokes relapse to drug-seeking and drug-taking. “Exposure to stress is the most powerful and reliable experimental manipulation used to induce reinstatement of alcohol or drug use,” one team of researchers reports. “Stressful experiences,” another research group points out, “increase the vulnerability of the individual to either develop drug self-administration or relapse”.
Stress also diminishes the activity of the dopamine receptors in the emotional circuits of the forebrain, particularly in the nucleus accumbens, where the cravings for drugs increases as the dopamine receptors function decreases. The research literature has identified three factors that universally lead to stress for human beings: uncertainty, lack of information and lose of control. To these we may add conflict that the organism is unable to handle and isolation from emotionally supportive relationships. Animal studies have demonstrated that isolation leads to changes in brain receptors and increased propensity for drug use in infant animals, and in adults reduces the activity of dopamine-dependent nerve cells. Unlike rats reared together in isolation, rats housed together in stable social groupings resisted cocaine self-administration – in the same way that Bruce Alexander’s tenants in Rat Park were impervious to the charms of heroin.”
– Dr. Gabor Mate. In The Realm of Hungry Ghosts p.198
I’m not finished reading the book yet, so I expect to have a few more quotes to share. What initially drew me in was the stories of how Dr.Maté interacts with his clientele in Vancouver’s Lower East Side and how he can see his own addictions mirrored in the people he helps everyday.
Share this:
Michael Kimmel – On Gender and Privilege
February 24, 2015 in Social Science | Tags: Gender, Privilege, Sociology | by The Arbourist | 2 comments
I’m reading Kimmel’s book GuyLand and I shudder to think of what I would be if I had engaged in the sort of crap that constitutes the typical male maturation process.
Share this:
On Blame – A Barrier to Accountability
February 10, 2015 in Social Science | Tags: Blame, Brene Brown, RSA Animate | by The Arbourist | 2 comments
Let’s just add this to the list of things to be mindful of when dealing with the important and not so important people in our lives. How often does it happen to you? Does it happen to you?
In hindsight, I can see that sometimes I do this and really, as the video says, it just isn’t very helpful.
Share this:
RSA Animate – The ABC’s of Persuasion
January 21, 2015 in Social Science | Tags: ABC's of Persuasion, RSA Animate, Sociology | by The Arbourist | Comments closed
We have not featured an RSA animate here at DWR like forever, so here we go a quick hit in the qualities of persuasion you should have.
Share this:
Logic: How to PWN an argument, without getting the RPOJ
January 12, 2015 in Atheism, Education, Feminism, Gender Issues, Quackery, Religion, Science, Social Science | Tags: argument, pedantry, RPOJ, Snark | by The Intransigent One | 2 comments
If you want to take down somebody else’s argument, a certain familiarity with the nature of intellectual or philosophical (as opposed to playground) argument is required, so that you can construct your own counter-argument. In an intellectual argument, the person putting forth an argument sets out a number of premises (statements of facts), which, when you add them together, at best makes it impossible for their conclusion to be false (deductive argument), or at least makes it much more likely that their conclusion is true (inductive argument).
If you want to show that somebody’s argument is wrongity wrong, there are two, and only two, tactics allowed:
- Show that at least one of the premises of the argument is untrue.
- Show that even if the premises of the argument are true, the conclusion does not follow logically and/or inductively.
Tactic #1 requires good research skills, including the ability to find good sources, and the consideration to provide links and references so that others can evaluate those sources. Research does not include saying, “Well it’s never happened to me, and nobody whose opinion I consider valid has every described anything like this to me, therefore the person recounting their experience must be mistaken.”
Tactic #2 requires an understanding of formal logic and logical fallacies, as well as an understanding of inductive reasoning, for example, the scientific method and statistical inference. Be sure you know what a Straw Man argument is, both so you don’t make one, and so you don’t go calling somebody else’s argument a straw man incorrectly. Be familiar with Ad Hominem and Ad Hominem Tu Quoque fallacies, and again, refrain from using them, and don’t go accusing others of using them, unless you actually know what they are. Understand that correlation does not equal causation, but that scientific research can still draw meaningful conclusions even if not all of it can meet the gold standard of perfectly-designed, randomly-assigned, double-blinded, longitudinal, etc etc etc experiments.
I know, I know… that’s a lot to ask of somebody who just wants to assert that their knee-jerk, market-wisdom-based, common-sense, status-quo-supporting opinion is Truth. Especially since going through the work of checking facts and reading the research may prove you wrong, and then what do you do.
Share this:
Social Maps of Cities – David Troy
December 15, 2014 in Social Science | Tags: Maps, Sociology | by The Arbourist | Comments closed
Interesting vid from TED about the social composition of cities. I would have liked David to get into a little more detail about the methodology used to create his pretty maps.
Share this:
Capitalism – “Breaking” Cultural Norms (Ochobo) by Reinforcing Them.
August 13, 2014 in Social Science | Tags: Capitalism Winning to Fail yet again, Cultural Norms, Japan, Liberation Wrapper, Ochobo, Sociological Images, Sociology | by The Arbourist | 8 comments
From Sociological Images Micheal Lozano –
[…] Japanese fast-food has found a way to bypass the cultural stigmas that impede their profits. One food chain noticed many women would not buy their biggest-sized burgers. The culprit was ochobo, a Japanese custom that prevents women from opening their mouth widely in public. Small mouths are considered beautiful and opening them widely is considered “ugly” and “rude.” The restaurant concluded that it would get into the business of “freeing women from the spell of ‘ochobo.’”

Face Veil, so liberating! much burger! noms tasty!
Of course, the irony is that the burger chain’s “solution” isn’t actually liberating women. By hiding the deviation behind a paper mask, it is actually reinforcing Ochobo. After all, the social reality remains — it is not acceptable for Japanese women to display an open mouth in public.



Your opinions…