Newsflash(?): Many of Steven Harper’s Policies are based on ideology and not fact.
Wow, way to go Libs. You finally caught a whiff of the conservative miasma that has engulfed our country. Where do you stake your claim? Draw your line in the sand? Where do you make your stand and bellicosely shout “You shall not pass!” The systemic underfunding of women’s groups? The overspending glut and fake lake of the G8 summit spending? Not funding abortions in the third world? Nope.
How about the Long form Census and the Long Firearms Registry. It is on these two ‘important’ issues our principled opposition has brought the noise.
“The Harper government has adopted a deliberate strategy of hiding information from Canadians in order to advance a right-wing social and justice agenda, Liberals charge.
Liberal MP John McCallum pointed Thursday to two recent examples to prove the point: The government’s decision to scrap the mandatory long-form census and its refusal to release a favourable report on the effectiveness of the long-gun registry.
He called the approach “a triumph of ignorance over knowledge, a triumph of ideology over science.”
Those of us who follow our enlightened government have be aware of this small fact for quite awhile. During the election(s) Harper has often been accused of having a ‘hidden-agenda’. I would argue that in has never been hidden from the public, as one can ascertain his policy motives and goals quite easily.
The “Tough on Crime” agenda is classical social conservative hogwash and prime example of what Harper and his conservatives are about. Consider, we need more prisons for unreported crimes because our crime rate is falling. it seems that little mistakes like this are not really worth the Oppositions time.
Now what McCallum says is true, but why the onslaught on these particular issues?
“McCallum said the decision to turn the compulsory long-form census into a voluntary survey is “one of the most visible examples of one of the most fundamental shortcomings” of the Harper government.
He said it’s aimed at robbing federal, provincial and municipal governments of the reliable data they need to deliver progressive social programs. It would skew “the picture of what Canada really looks like” because low-income and minority Canadians will be less likely to fill out a voluntary form.”
Makes sense to me. We need to know about our population to best meet its needs.
“McCallum also cited the government’s refusal to release the annual RCMP evaluation of the gun registry’s effectiveness as another example of Harper’s penchant for stifling facts.
Opposition parties maintain the government has been sitting on the report for six months and wants to keep it hidden until after a crucial September vote on Tory backbencher Candice Hoeppner’s private member’s bill to scrap the controversial registry.
According to the CBC, the report concludes the registry is cost-effective, efficient and “an important tool for law enforcement.”
“Clearly the Conservatives want to prevent parliamentarians and Canadians from seeing important information about the cost and effectiveness of the long-gun registry before an important vote,” McCallum said.”
Now again, sitting on bad news is not strictly a conservative phenomena, but the long gun registry has been a contentious issue during election time and that is about it. We are getting much drama for issues that seem to be a low priority for many Canadians.
There is plenty of fodder to roast Harper and his conservatives with, why is the opposition focused on these relatively low key issues? I’m hoping it is part of a bigger strategy that builds on a few small examples and then works it way up the ladder of importance. I’d like to be right about this, but I have my doubts.






7 comments
September 1, 2010 at 10:50 am
Vern R. Kaine
”…because low-income and minority Canadians will be less likely to fill out a voluntary form.”
Less likely? How so?
“According to the CBC, the report concludes the registry is cost-effective, efficient and “an important tool for law enforcement.”
That would be a nice change from where it started. If the report is biased, it deserves proper scrutiny but if it’s stating fact re: “cost-effective and efficient” then the government is wrong to withhold it.
That all being said, however, you seem to talk of the Liberal Party as though they’ve never been ones to play their own parliamentary tricks, create their own scandals, or try to push ideology over practicality.
LikeLike
September 2, 2010 at 9:27 pm
The Arbourist
Less likely? How so?
Doing a voluntary census is not really a high priority when you are scrabbling to make ends meet.
That all being said, however, you seem to talk of the Liberal Party as though they’ve never been ones to play their own parliamentary tricks, create their own scandals, or try to push ideology over practicality.
Always looking for the partisan notes to play Mr.Kaine? I do not have much love for the federal liberal party of Canada, however they manage to erode the social fabric of Canada at slower rate than the Conservatives, and I give them credit for that. But not much else.
LikeLike
September 3, 2010 at 12:33 am
Vern R. Kaine
“Doing a voluntary census is not really a high priority when you are scrabbling to make ends meet.”
That doesn’t make sense considering that they’re the exactly the people who get helped through the reporting of their information. I think apathy is a more accurate explanation.
“Always looking for the partisan notes to play, Mr. Kaine?”
Haha! I’m definitely guilty there – BUSTED!
Not a big fan of the Liberal Party either. Not sure what they’ve done the past 6 years or so, but I do remember them being in power WAY too long and getting way too comfortable. I also remember Martin playing with the election dates to give Canadians more time to forget the scandals.
Not sure how anyone can be too critical of anybody in Canada right now. I’m sure dumb decisions are still being made at the political level, but overall I’ve been proud to see what the country has done with itself after being knocked and judged for so long by Americans. My one half is very proud!!!!
LikeLike
September 3, 2010 at 12:34 am
Vern R. Kaine
Oops – question mark instead of period after “explanation”. Also, we’re all friends here (aren’t we?!) You can call me Vern.
LikeLike
September 3, 2010 at 5:30 pm
The Arbourist
Of course Vern, but I always like to err on the side of being polite as here on the intertoobz intent and ‘tone’ can be so easily misconstrued. :)
LikeLike
October 4, 2010 at 7:03 am
Harper, Kenney and Galloway – Two Idiots and a Scapegoat. « Dead Wild Roses
[…] to mention the embarrassment I feel when yet another wacky conservative policy (find any of that unreported crime yet Mr.Day?) is exposed for being based on wingnuttery as opposed to rational […]
LikeLike
October 9, 2010 at 9:04 am
Vic “The Warden” Toews – Master of Unreality « Dead Wild Roses
[…] of crime rate.” I think tricky Vic and Stockwell Day are starting to use the same brand of hallucinatory. (Not that Conservatives hate evidence based policy… much.) […]
LikeLike