Banks responsible for their actions? People not wanting Public dollars to repay private investment failures? The people of Iceland got it right unlike our neighbours who throw billions into the private investment arena and then cry poverty when it comes to budget time and suddenly finding the need to cut public programs to ‘balance’ the budget. Iceland though is refusing to play the game.
“Icelanders say citizens should not bail out irresponsible bankers who were blamed for the collapse of the Icesave bank and the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars.”
I wonder if anyone during the referendum said that “Icesave was too big to fail…”
“The debt was incurred when Britain and the Netherlands compensated their nationals who lost savings in online Icesave accounts owned by Landsbanki, one of three Icelandic banks that collapsed in late 2008.
Icelandic lawmakers in February backed the repayment plan agreed with creditors in December, but the president refused to sign the bill, triggering the referendum.
In March 2010, Icelanders rejected an earlier Icesave repayment blueprint in a referendum.”
The will of the people of Iceland should serve as an example to all when it comes to the financial sector and how to deal
with the inevitable static produced by the strongmen of the system.
“In a first stage in legal proceedings last year, ESA said that Iceland should pay compensation to Icesave depositors.
Danny Alexander, Britain’s chief secretary to the treasury said on Sunday he was disappointed that Icelanders had again rejected an “Icesave” debt deal.
“It is obviously disappointing that it seems that the people of Iceland have rejected what was a negotiated settlement,” Alexander told BBC television.
“Of course we respect the will of the Icelandic people in this matter and we are going to have to now go and talk to the international partners with whom we work, not least the government of the Netherlands.
“It now looks like this process will end up in the courts,” he said.”
The people of Iceland have a point, why should they shoulder the burden of a private company that made bad business decisions? The idea of privatizing the profit and leaving the risk to the public clearly has no currency in Iceland.
“I know this will probably hurt us internationally, but it is worth taking a stand,” Thorgerdun Asgeirsdottir, a 28-year-old barista said after casting a “no” vote at the Reykjavik city hall.
Svanhvit Ingibergs, 33, who works at a rest home, said: “I had no part in causing those debts, and I don’t want our children to risk having to pay them. It would be better to settle this in a court.”
The dispute over repayment has soured relations between the small North Atlantic island nation and the two other countries.”
Hopefully the courts will rule with the people on this one and in this case the financial sector will not be repaid for its avarice and foolhardy behaviour.






6 comments
April 11, 2011 at 8:37 am
Vern R. Kaine
Unclear on your position here, Arb – are you saying you were against the bailout in the US, or that you were for the bailout but against them later cutting social programs?
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 4:42 pm
The Arbourist
I would have to say that I am (and was) against the bailout. It was and continues to be a wealth transfer from the poor to the rich and ultimately has only precluded the next big crash for a little while.
It is working great for the conservative forces in the US as it gives them ammo to make cuts to spending programs to the poor, which clearly is not the problem. The socialism for the rich though, is the real culprit as being able to take risk without consequence only sets precedent for more irresponsible financial sector decisions.
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Bleatmop
I’m not necessarily against socialism for the rich, I’m just against it when it is ONLY for the rich. The bail-out for the banks in the US was one of the most irresponsible handovers of public money to the richest of the rich who showed not regret or accountability for destroying so many peoples pensions and lives in general. If there was a need to stop certain institutions from failing for the greater good, ie. preventing a complete collapse of the economy, then it should have been done in a measured and responsible manner. The all you can eat on the public’s bill, get your bonuses for destroying the world economy bailout was not the way to do that.
As far as Iceland goes, I’m not sure why the British diplomat thought that the Icelandic government should foot the bill? Is it a nationalized bank? I would consider it fair if certain loans were guaranteed or whatnot by a CDIC type of organization, then the obligations outlined by that organization should be met. Of course this is just speculative as I don’t know what’s really going on. If this was a 100% private bank, then I think the public risk should be 0%
LikeLike
August 4, 2012 at 7:07 am
The Icy Songs of Fire
[…] Image via: deadwildroses.wordpress.com TweetComments Tags: iceland, instrumental ← Being a Mirror […]
LikeLike
September 16, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Frank
Strong stand and take care your country forever.
LikeLike
September 16, 2012 at 12:55 pm
The Arbourist
@ Frank
Err..okay :) Thanks Frank.
LikeLike