Excerpt from the Alter.net transcript of the Moyers/Hedges conversation.
BILL MOYERS: “They lost control of the park. The arrival in cold weather of individual tents, along with the numerous street people with mental impairment and addictions,” that you’re nothing if not honest in what you write, even about those people you support, “tore apart the community. Drug use as well as assaults and altercations became common.” So how is that square with what you said earlier that the Occupy Movement gave us a blueprint for how to fight back?
CHRIS HEDGES: Because this is the trajectory of all movements. You know, it’s not a linear progression upwards. And the civil rights movement is a perfect example of that. All sorts of failures, whether it’s in Albany, Mississippi or anywhere else. You know, there were all sorts of moments within the civil rights movement where King wasn’t even sure he was going to be able to hold it together. And what happened in Zuccotti is like what happened in 1765 when they rose up against the Stamp Act.
That became the kind of dress rehearsal for the rebellion of 1775, 1776, 1905. The uprising in Russia became again the kind of dress rehearsal. These movements, this process, it takes a very long time. I think the Occupy was movement and I was there.
I mean, I certainly understand why it imploded and its many faults and how at that size, consensus doesn’t work, everything else. And yet it triggered something. It triggered a kind of understanding of systems of power. It, I think, gave people a sense of their own personal power. Once we step out into a group and articulate these injustices and these grievances to a wider public, and of course they resonated with a mainstream. I don’t think it’s over. I don’t know how it’s going to mutate and change, one never knows. But, I think that it’s imperative that we keep that narrative alive by being out there because things are not getting better.
The state is not responding in a rational way to what’s happening. If they really wanted to break the back of the opposition movement, rather than sort of eradicating the 18 encampments, they would’ve gone back and looked at Roosevelt. There would’ve been forgiveness of all student debt, $1 trillion, there would’ve been a massive jobs program targeted at those under the age of 25, and there would’ve been a moratorium on more closures and bank repossessions of homes.
That would’ve been a rational response. Instead, the state has decided to speak exclusively in the language of force and violence to try and crush this movement while people continue this dissent.”
Occupy is far from over. Raising consciousness is but one step in the game plan.




5 comments
July 30, 2012 at 4:47 pm
VR Kaine
Interesting that to defend Occupy’s disorganization, Hedges has to selectively go back 60, 100, even 400+ years ago and try to make comparison there, avoiding the obviously great organization of the Tea Party that was in our time. Not just in our time and organized, but also effective – there was nowhere near the level of violence that Occupy had, nowhere near the level of anarchy, and yet more change happened. People got elected, and things changed (better or worse) in a fraction of the time.
Defending the jokefest that was Occupy 1.0 as some sort of “readiness campaign” is like accepting some guy’s excuse that his 72hr binge in Vegas on booze, drugs, and hookers was him just “preparing” for a campaign against alcohol and drug abuse down the road. Unfortunately for us, however, Occupy’s entitlement and debauchery hasn’t lasted only 72hrs, it’s lasted years and is still going.
If Occupy comes back actually organized I welcome it as I do good competition for the right, but there’s no escaping the fact that as a whole they were a bunch of entitled, disorganized clowns the entire time and their own worst enemy.
Either way, I can’t wait – Occupy 2.0 – The Return of ‘Ketchup'”! Twinkly-fingers up, everybody!!!! :)
LikeLike
August 9, 2012 at 9:20 am
pino
The state is not responding in a rational way to what’s happening. If they really wanted to break the back of the opposition movement, rather than sort of eradicating the 18 encampments, they would’ve gone back and looked at Roosevelt. There would’ve been forgiveness of all student debt, $1 trillion, there would’ve been a massive jobs program targeted at those under the age of 25, and there would’ve been a moratorium on more closures and bank repossessions of homes.
I think some caution needs to be applied here. The commentator, by claiming that the above steps should have been taken, is demonstrating that he’s very liberal. As such, he’s sympathetic to the whole Occupy movement.
It would be interesting to see what he has to say about the Tea Party, something much less flattering I suppose.
LikeLike
August 9, 2012 at 9:47 am
VR Kaine
I like the fantasy ideas of just “forgiving” all student debt. Let’s just forgive all mortgages because banks have record profits.
And what exactly does a job program for those under 25 look like? College kids with little to no experience and specialized degrees and a government program to accomodate work in each one of those degree fields? Unlikely. Or does a “job program” mean they’ll be out repairing bridges and kicking the older guy with a family off that job because he’s now too expensive?
LikeLike
August 9, 2012 at 9:56 am
The Arbourist
@ Pino
Poked around youtube a bit and an article.
LikeLike
August 9, 2012 at 10:03 am
The Arbourist
@ Vern
At one time in American political history bailing out car companies and investment industries (“too big to fail”) would have also been considered a fantasy.
But then again, it seems you have little problem in giving money away as long as its to business and the associated correct class of people.
LikeLike