The Western press is/was conspicuously quiet when Hugo Chavez died. Our press is always mute when it comes to giving attention to official enemies or other successful political systems. Here is an excerpt from Alter.net about Chavez and some of his achievements.
“The regional blocs he worked to create fostered south-to-south economic and political alliances, provided a check to US military power in the region, and encouraged the leftist politics and economic policies of presidents across Latin America.
Beyond this regional influence, some of Chávez’s greatest legacies are not in the presidential palace, but in the streets, factories and neighborhoods of Venezuela, among the activists, workers and neighbors who have built the Bolivarian Revolution from the bottom up.
From communal councils to worker-run factories, Venezuela is the site of the some of the most sophisticated and successful experiments in direct democracy, socialism and worker-control in the world. While Chávez was a key figure in the development of many of these projects and initiatives, it is the Venezuelan people that brought them to life and will keep them alive after his death. Many of these programs are characterized not by top-down, bureaucratic state policies, or government funding handed out to create electoral support. They are the projects of people using the Bolivarian Revolution as a grassroots tool.
Since taking office in 1999 Chávez used his mandate as a leader, and the nation’s oil wealth, to create programs that provide free education, dental and health clinics, land and housing reform, government-subsidized supermarkets, and hundreds of thousands of business cooperatives. In Venezuela, where much of the population lives below the poverty line, these programs have had an enormous impact. Other government initiatives have helped spur on activism from below, self-governance at a local level, and direct democracy in political decision-making and funding.”
I recommend reading the full article.



4 comments
March 21, 2013 at 10:06 am
syrbal
I think the main reason the US disliked Chavez is that he simply wasn’t being a supplicant at America’s knees. How dare a country, or its leader NOT need us? We should start working on getting used to that.
LikeLike
March 21, 2013 at 2:14 pm
VR Kaine
Since taking office in 1999 Chávez used his mandate as a leader, and the nation’s oil wealth, to create programs that provide free education, dental and health clinics, land and housing reform, government-subsidized supermarkets, and hundreds of thousands of business cooperatives. In Venezuela, where much of the population lives below the poverty line, these programs have had an enormous impact. Other government initiatives have helped spur on activism from below, self-governance at a local level, and direct democracy in political decision-making and funding.”
Curious – with all these leftist policies, and a country so rich in oil, how can so many still be below the poverty line? Isn’t free education, activism, health care, and mass unionization the ticket to escaping poverty? ;)
LikeLike
March 21, 2013 at 2:17 pm
VR Kaine
@ Syrbal,
That part of his legacy makes me snicker and is why I don’t vilify him in the way the right does. Perkins’ “diary of an economic hitman” is an interesting read in that respect.
Many Americans get upset (and understandably so) at anyone who glorifies someone who so outright hates their country. Like “hating” socialism, I bet most couldn’t say what things he’s actually done that they hate.
LikeLike
March 21, 2013 at 6:07 pm
VR Kaine
Oops – forgot a “however” after socialism.
LikeLike