The notion that the bible is the inerrant word of god is a joke. Try more like the ‘telephone game’ but using different languages and just saying no to clarity and connection to historical accuracy.
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- 'Too much regulation, not enough action': Carney rebuffs Trudeau's climate policies
- Fear, death and hope in a city under the shadows of a Mexican cartel war
- In the trades, apprentices are increasing, but not enough are making it to certification
- Winter blues got you down? Here’s what experts say could help
- Rage-baiting the slop: Why are the words of the year so weird?
- ‘The Nazis were right': What the leaders of Canada’s biggest ‘nationalist’ group really want
- Kirsten Hillman is leaving D.C. Here's what Canada's ambassador has learned about Trump's America
- At least 16 files have disappeared from DOJ webpage for Epstein documents since their release
- Bowen Yang to depart Saturday Night Live mid-season
- U.S. says it has seized yet another oil tanker near Venezuela's coast
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
5 comments
June 1, 2014 at 9:50 am
john zande
Seven minutes and forty-seven seconds of awesome.
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 9:53 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
I was kind of thinking that this was your cup of tea. :>
OT: Have you slapped Richard silly yet for his abuse of coherency and rambling wall o’ texts stream of consciousness horse-pucky?
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:10 am
myatheistlife
Well, there you have it. A coherent explanation of the Christian holy texts. That’s not something you’ll get from a believer though. Merikans think Jesus was white and spoke English because the King James bible is god’s innerant word. They profess fondness for their NT but few of them really read it. Ever sit in on a Sunday sermon? Half of them jump from book to book picking up just a verse or two each time so they can create the lesson they want rather than stick to the script on the pages. I don’t mean contrasting the same story as written in the four gospels, I mean jumping OT to NT and all over as if the books were written to contain some coherent thought across the hundreds of years it took to write them. You might as well call Dan Brown a prophet, at least his story was tightly woven and ‘seemed’ coherent.
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:14 am
The Arbourist
@MAL
LOL :)
All hail Dan Brown!
LikeLike
June 1, 2014 at 11:23 am
john zande
He’s beyond hope, but i’m loving your exchanges :)
LikeLike