The amount of horseshit per square centimetre in this Edmonton Journal editorial must violate the laws of physics, it just isn’t reasonable to pack this much fail into one column of newspaper. Who wrote this tepid work of Tory apologia? To me it smells like the business owners out East decided they needed to nobly stand up for the privileged in our province.
I’ve excerpted the parts I wanted to comment on, but you really should read the entire slavering, propagandistic ode the PC party over at the lowly esteemed Edmonton Journal. Duly note that this is corporate boot-licking at its finest, we should expect nothing less from the fearlessly-besotted-lick-spittles of what passes for editorial board over at the EJ.
“The choice, then, in Tuesday’s provincial election, comes down to competing economic visions.
We need a premier who can be our chief executive, piloting a $48-billion public company through a fiscal minefield for at least the next two years, while the world price of Alberta’s lifeblood, its oil, remains below $75 per barrel.
That person is Jim Prentice.”
I’m not looking for a fracking CEO to run our province. The last thing we need is more business bullshit that erodes our values and sense of community, and more to the point our sense of humanity.
“In his March budget, Prentice came to grips with the issue of the province’s dependence on volatile oil revenues, and took the bold move of ending Alberta’s anti-tax political culture.”
Boldly raising the sin taxes and the gas tax. Visionary stuff there, filled with visiony things and stuff…
“Is it a perfect plan? No. Even he’s admitted that, having reversed a decision to cut a charitable tax credit in half. There’s more room for improvement; many voters believe he should have spread the tax pain to the corporate sector.
Those types of changes could come if Prentice listens to the apparent groundswell of discontent that’s being revealed by recent polls.”
OH OF COURSE, our allegiance to the status quo has been serving the people of Alberta so damn well over the last 41 years. Please note that changing the status quo never starts with electing more of the status quo.
“No one wants another costly and divisive election, hard on the heels of this one.”
Then don’t vote PC and we won’t have any problems with another divisive election, you know kinda like this election called opportunistically before the legislated date.
“only the PCs have campaigned on a vision that balances revenue generation with spending cuts in a way that will allow Alberta to weather this fiscal crisis and be better prepared to avoid future catastrophic swings in oil prices.”
Oh you mean where we balance the books on the backs of the poor and middle class while the elites and the corporations continue to unjustly prosper in our society. I’m tired of that particular PC corporate provincial strategy.
“That sort of thinking is a clear sign that Prentice isn’t leading the same old Tory party; he’s a leader with clarity of vision and the aptitude to chart a new course for Alberta.”
How come this ‘new course’ sounds and looks exactly like the old course from yesteryear, only with different clowns at the wheel? There is no ‘new course’ only more of the same BS that has been and will be bad for the average Albertan.




9 comments
May 2, 2015 at 1:20 pm
anonymous
Well said.
LikeLike
May 2, 2015 at 3:16 pm
Sedate Me
You’re right. That editorial was a steaming pile of horseshit worthy of the compost pile. Then again, what would you expect from the ever consolidating newspaper oligopoly other than status-quo promoting, corporate fluff-jobs?
“That sort of thinking is a clear sign that Prentice isn’t leading the same old Tory party; he’s a leader with clarity of vision and the aptitude to chart a new course for Alberta.” -Ed Journal
I could barely stop laughing at that utterly meaningless, worthless, salad tossing, statement long enough to finish writing this comment in just one day.
An uninspired, milquetoast, cut & paste endorsement, if ever there was one. “New & different” blah, blah, blah. “Clarity & vision” blah, blah, blah. It’s the exact same horseshit that every single newspaper prints when endorsing a new leader of a party in an election, even when leading the party in power (for 41 years!) I’m sure you could find a word-for-word match run by some Canadian newspaper, with the only difference being the name, party & jurisdiction.
“Boldly raising the sin taxes and the gas tax. Visionary stuff there, filled with visiony things and stuff…”
To be fair, in this day & age, just suggesting you might raise sales/sin taxes (forget income tax!) is about as “bold” as The Powers That Be will allow you to get without assassinating you.
Sure, such taxes generally need raising, but it’s hardly worth mentioning. If that’s one of your economic centrepieces, you’re doomed! But seriously, how utterly incompetent do you have to be to EVER have a budgetary crisis in a province that floats on oil? George W Bush could probably balance Alberta’s budget 8 out of 10 years.
Jim Prentice, that “vision” you’re having…you just might be seeing The End Times of your party.
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 3:48 am
bleatmop
The plot thickens…
https://storify.com/SuzetteChan/paula-simons
It seems just a couple of days ago they were planning on standing by their policy of not endorsing anyone.
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 8:06 am
The Arbourist
@Sedate me
This one struck close to home. I know the EJ isn’t a bad paper – but I’ve never seen this level of obsequiousness from their editorial staff. The editorial in question belongs in the bonafide rag that is circulated here, the Edmonton Sun.
It’s not nice when your newspaper betrays you. They will have a letter or three coming their way so they know exactly the depth of my discontent with them.
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 8:08 am
The Arbourist
@bleatmop
Sounds like someone got on the blower and told the editorial board they had better toe the company line. Disheartening and disgusting. Full marks to Paula Simons though for being straight and honest on the record.
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 1:29 pm
Sedate Me
Arbourist,
You hit the nail on the head there. These days, opinions are what head office says they are. Such is the nature of newspapers (and Bell TV) today.
My newspaper betrays me every single damn day. The massive chain that owns your local paper (local…haha!) is about to merge with the massive chain that owns my local (haha!) newspaper. I don’t know how the Edmonton Journal rolls, but here’s how it works at my city’s only paper.
Head office tells the editors what opinions to have, then they have them word for word, despite publicly retaining “local editorial control”. Head office also replaced local writers of opinion with national ones, most of whom worked at a (thankfully defunct) “news” network the chain owned. This was a “synergy” thing to generate national right wing media stars. So, people reading my local paper are regularly told by members of the Alberta Report crowd what’s wrong with my Eastern province. (Spoiler Alert: Lefties.)
Most of my city’s opinion makers have never even been to my city. Their job is to cheer on the head office party line in every single column. Increasingly, most of these cheerleaders also write opinions pieces camouflaged as news stories. Head office says this is no problem because they have “journalistic integrity” (Wat dat again?)
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 2:06 pm
The Arbourist
@Sedate Me
Much of our media is thoroughly compromised. The CBC is being hamstrung to the point where they won’t be able to do anything worthwhile anymore. We need to get a government in power that will double if not treble the funds to the CBC, because a strong media is essential to a strong democracy.
Al-jazeera is still pretty good, I’d still recommend following their take on much of the news if you are looking for good journalism. I also recommend following the fine fellows over at Media Lens – they are doing their best to keep the British media on their toes.
LikeLike
May 3, 2015 at 2:36 pm
Sedate Me
Maybe the CBC should re-hire Mike Duffy & Pam Wallin as economic advisers. They seem to know how to turn bills into economic opportunities.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 3:51 pm
bleatmop
and confirmed… Owner of the paper is a conservative hack who doesn’t even live in Alberta. Fortunately the endorsements of a rich Ontarian doesn’t seem to have changed the polls. It’s a little scary for transparent media though if he starts taking a more active role in telling the editorial department what they should and should not be printing.
LikeLiked by 1 person