Gavin de Becker in his book The Gift of Fear is about how we sometimes short circuit the information we receive from the environment. Here is an excerpt regarding a seeking help in a situation and concluding with how social dynamics really bollocks things up for women.
“A woman alone who needs assistance is actually far better off choosing someone and asking for help, as opposed to waiting for an unsolicited approach. The person you choose is nowhere near as likely to bring you hazard as is the person who chooses you. That’s because the possibility that you’ll inadvertently select a predatory criminal for whom you are the right victim type is very remote. I encourage women to ask other women for help when they need it, and it’s likewise safer to accept an offer from a woman than from a man. (Unfortunately, women rarely make such offers to other women, and I wish more would.)
I want to clarify that many men offer help without any sinister or self-serving intent, with no more in mind than kindness and chivalry, but I have been addressing those times that men refuse to hear the word “No,” and that is not chivalrous—it is dangerous.
When someone ignores that word, ask yourself: Why is this person seeking to control me? What does he want? It is best to get away from the person altogether, but if that’s not practical, the response that serves safety is to dramatically raise your insistence, skipping several levels of politeness. “I said NO!”
When I encounter people hung up on the seeming rudeness of this response (and there are many), I imagine this conversation after a stranger is told No by a woman he has approached:
MAN: What a bitch. What’s your problem, lady? I was just trying to offer a little help to a pretty woman. What are you so paranoid about?
WOMAN: You’re right. I shouldn’t be wary. I’m overreacting about nothing. I mean, just because a man makes an unsolicited and persistent approach in an underground parking lot in a society where crimes against women have risen four times faster than the general crime rate, and three out of four women will suffer a violent crime; and just because I’ve personally heard horror stories from every female friend I’ve ever had; and just because I have to consider where I park, where I walk, whom I talk to, and whom I date in the context of whether someone will kill me or rape me or scare me half to death; and just because several times a week someone makes an inappropriate remark, stares at me, harasses me, follows me, or drives alongside my car pacing me; and just because I have to deal with the apartment manager who gives me the creeps for reasons I haven’t figured out, yet I can tell by the way he looks at me that given an opportunity he’d do something that would get us both on the evening news; and just because these are life-and-death issues most men know nothing about so that I’m made to feel foolish for being cautious even though I live at the center of a swirl of possible hazards DOESN’T MEAN A WOMAN SHOULD BE WARY OF A STRANGER WHO IGNORES THE WORD ‘NO’.”
Whether or not men can relate to it or believe it or accept it, that is the way it is. Women, particularly in big cities, live with a constant wariness. Their lives are literally on the line in ways men just don’t experience. Ask some man you know, “When is the last time you were concerned or afraid that another person would harm you?” Many men cannot recall an incident within years. Ask a woman the same question and most will give you a recent example or say, “Last night,” “Today,” or even “Every day.”
Still, women’s concerns about safety are frequently the subject of critical comments from the men in their lives. One woman told me of constant ridicule and sarcasm from her boyfriend whenever she discussed fear or safety. He called her precautions silly and asked, “How can you live like that?” To which she replied, “How could I not?”
I have a message for women who feel forced to defend their safety concerns: tell Mister I-Know-Everything-About-Danger that he has nothing to contribute to the topic of your personal security. Tell him that your survival instinct is a gift from Nature that knows a lot more about your safety than he does. And tell him that nature does not require his approval.
It is understandable that the perspectives of men and women on safety are so different—men and women live in different worlds. I don’t remember where I first heard this simple description of one dramatic contrast between the genders, but it is strikingly accurate: At core, men are afraid women will laugh at them, while at core, women are afraid men will kill them.”-Gavin de Becker. The Gift of Fear, pp 31 – 32.




12 comments
February 10, 2016 at 2:00 pm
Miep
Reblogged this on There Are So Many Things Wrong With This.
LikeLike
February 10, 2016 at 4:17 pm
syrbal-labrys
You don’t really want me to discuss eggshell-thin egos, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 10, 2016 at 6:50 pm
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
How many ways are there to discuss the male whaaambulance brigade? :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 11, 2016 at 4:43 pm
Emma
One of the mind-bending mysteries of Talking With MRA (that should make a blog series in itself) for me was discovering the double-bind in which these types (and not only) put women.
Woman: Please do not encroach on my personal space, it frightens me.
MRA: Typical. Feminist poisoning taught you that all men are rapists. That’s not true. I’m not a rapist.* I don’t know any men who are rapists.**
Woman: I was raped on my way from work (school, nunnery, etc.)
MRA: Typical. Feminist poisoning taught you that you can go anywhere without fear of consequences. If you insist on walking alone from work (school, nunnery, etc.), what do you expect?
IOW, you are damned if you do (try to protect yourself, cautiously and reasonably assuming that the stranger in front of you may not have good intentions) and you are damned if you don’t (take a risk of encountering a man / men throughout a course of your day, forget assuming that he may be dangerous). Either way, it is always the woman’s fault (ITATWF).
MRA (and not only, obviously) want women to not assume that any man can be potentially dangerous; but if they don’t assume that and they get hurt, they will be blamed for being “reckless.”
I encountered this crazy-making “reasoning” early on in my “discussions” with MRA, such as they were, and it took me a while to process it and understand that there is no rhyme or reason to it, and it is just their standard ITATWF technique.
*He may or may not be telling the truth.
**He most definitely is not telling the truth. Although yes, he believes it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 11, 2016 at 7:04 pm
Emma
MAN: What a bitch. What’s your problem, lady? I was just trying to offer a little help to a pretty woman. What are you so paranoid about?
Exhibit A:
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 11, 2016 at 10:40 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
Your experience is, sadly, very typical of many of the women who attempt to discuss things with MRA’s. It is a such a fine dance the MRA’s put on – ignoring the privileges they were born with and then wearing their fragile ego’s on their sleeve when things don’t go their way.
As you mentioned, they almost always invoke the first rule of misogyny – women are responsible for the actions of men. :/
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 11, 2016 at 10:49 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
Rapists don’t wear helpful signs identifying them as the scum that they are.
I could run the Schrodinger’s Rapist post every week and still dudes wouldn’t get it.
Is it active ignorance, a keen lack of empathy or just stupidity? Who knows? :/
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 12, 2016 at 7:26 am
VR Kaine
I’d go a little deeper than that, Arb, and would say that with MRA’s it is simply an extreme insecurity at the core. These men simply don’t feel worthy – whether it’s because they had a mother that didn’t coddle them, a girl that rejected them, a fight (or job, or custody battle) that they lost either once or repeatedly – all that may feed that core inner belief that they’re not worthy and because the emotional loss is an enormous one (and probably an early one), it’s well-ingrained.
Being deeply emotional, the emotional choice is usually “fight or flight” for these people – “flight” being hiding behind some group, label, or “us vs. them” mentality and not doing anything about it (except blog) proclaiming themselves a victim, whereas “fight” means initiating a volley of personal attacks out of fear. Either way, I think both require a person to be extremely selfish and self-absorbed which either causes or shows up as the things you mentioned – ignorance, a lack of empathy, and stupidity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Emma
I have studied these guys for a while — an activity that was somewhat thrown at me by circumstances, rather that completely freely undertaken — and as I am a psychologist by training, I could not help but notice their flaming pathology. The manosphere is a magnet for male psychopathology of certain kinds, particularly character disorders. Psychopathy and narcissism especially predominate among the spherian bloggers and their regulars.
It is no surprise that they (in the US) are so enamored, en masse, with Trump and cheer his rise to power. They recognize him as one of their own.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 12, 2016 at 12:58 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
That sounds much better than a magnet for pants-on-head stupidity. I’ll have to write that down. :)
I’d willing to wager that along with what you’ve said, the active campaign by the media to keep people from thinking about substantive issues…heck even critical thought… is also partially responsible for the rise of Trump.
His rhetoric, to the uncritical mind, could be very appealing. :/
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 2:42 pm
VR Kaine
“It is no surprise that they (in the US) are so enamored, en masse, with Trump and cheer his rise to power. They recognize him as one of their own.”
Absolutely. In my opinion the entire US election right now is being driven by either narcissism or entitlement with zero common-sense, critical thinking, or basic arithmetic happening alongside.
The top two candidates on either side demonstrate this far more than any other politician ever has and the narcissistic and entitlement-ridden public which makes up the majority of America right now is eating it up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 12, 2016 at 2:54 pm
VR Kaine
“I’d willing to wager that along with what you’ve said, the active campaign by the media to keep people from thinking about substantive issues…heck even critical thought… is also partially responsible for the rise of Trump. “
I’d say it’s fully responsible, and the media from both sides making it happen. On the right Fox isn’t calling Trump or any of its candidates out on anything, and on the left nobody is questioning Bernie’s math or Hillary’s cronyism, abuse of power, of failed coverup. So the pissed off left are running to Bernie and the pissed off right are running to Trump without any more thinking other than, “We’re mad and can’t take it anymore.”
Keep people in the ideological pissing matches and the media gets ratings. Plus, keep throwing softballs at your favorite candidates and you’ll get the big interviews – and more ratings. Pretty bad when the reporters are vying for popularity amongst themselves with the candidates.
It’s like your past blog post, Arb: there is no journalism anymore which in my opinion – based upon what the Founding Fathers wanted – means that America is currently a failed State.
LikeLiked by 1 person