Medical facts? The real question is can we use ‘x’ to curtail woman’s rights, if so, run that story…
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Pressure builds to overhaul child welfare system after Ontario couple convicted of murder, torture of 2 boys
- The drone war comes home: Canada scrambles to shield military bases in legal grey zone
- Ottawa settles lawsuit with Canadians whose CRA accounts were hacked for $8.7M
- No whey, a cottage cheese shortage? Demand surges amid protein craze
- These students are limiting their own smartphone, social media and tech use. Here's why
- Disarming Hezbollah is about much more than guns and rockets
- Former NHL goalie Carey Price among those calling for changes to Indian Act
- Mexico trade mission launches in Toronto as businesses seek to expand ties with Canada
- Russia and U.S. amplifying Alberta separatist narratives to stoke division, distrust: report
- Purported Epstein suicide note unsealed by New York judge
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
3 comments
February 19, 2016 at 10:52 am
Miep
The real facts are that if women kicked men out of the realm of making decisions about women’s bodies, they would have no say over who gets born. That’s actually a pretty big deal, so no wonder they resist. I read an interesting comment recently arguing that humans learning to determine paternity was a terrible thing for women. It gives men a specific way to feel possessive over women’s bodies that we could certainly do without. I have read more than one woman saying that if you do choose to become pregnant and give birth, never name the father. It’s a sad indictment on men, but I see their point.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 19, 2016 at 12:24 pm
roughseasinthemed
One of my childhood friends was a twin, and apparently the triplet died, and the other twin was physically and mentally disabled. The fit twin was told she kicked the triplet out. Weird story. So, holding the hand of the unborn one doesn’t ring true in that scenario.
As a side point, because I knew the twins from young, I never treat them differently. When we all grew older, the disabled one was less happy to meet her twin’s friends. Sad. But I predated that stereotyping, so I didn’t count.
I digress totally, but it’s a big issue about physical/mental disability.
LikeLike
February 20, 2016 at 11:34 am
Cindy
Fetuses are non-sentient and non-sapient.
The capacity for sentience is not possible until the 25th week of gestation, and even then they are un-conscious whilst in utero. This is why fetuses that are born en caul (aminotic sac doesn’t break) do not wake up – until they breathe in oxygen, they have zero awareness.
Also, one funny thing…
Why is it that fetuses are so magical that they can hold hands and even masturbate in utero, but once they are born they seem to lose all motor control?
LikeLiked by 2 people