Did you want to get the gist of Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky’s master work ‘Manufacturing Consent’ but not have to read that long, dryly informative tomb? Have I got the book for you. ‘Why are we the Good Guys?’ by David Cromwell runs on essentially the same thesis but is many more times engaging and yet at the same time, marginally less academically verbose than Manufacturing Consent. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire work and would like to share a pertinent excerpt on how media coverage perpetuates the destructive cycles (the financial meltdown of 2008 et cetera) we see in our society.
“All the media samples we’ve seen so far in this chapter are indicative of the narrow spectrum of permitted corporate and political opinion on the financial and economic crisis. Viewpoints are heavily biased toward the status quo, with only occasional fig leave of mild dissent. This spectrum of news reporting and commentary is systemically biased; it avoids scrutiny of an economic system that is both fundamentally flawed and stacked against the majority of humanity.
As Shutt notes, one of the most striking features of the ongoing crisis is: “the uniformly superficial nature of the analysis of its causes presented by mainstream observers, whether government officials, academics or business representatives. Thus it is commonly stated that the crisis was caused by a combination of imprudent investment by bankers and others […] and unduly lax official regulation and supervision of markets. Yet the obvious question begged by such explanations – of how or why such a dysfunctional climate came to be created – is never addressed in any serious fashion”. Shutt continued: ” The inescapable conclusion […] is that the crisis was the product of a conscious process of facilitating ever greater risk of massive systemic failure.”
With a few ruffled feathers here and there, Western leaders and their faithful retinue in the media and academia continue to deceive the public about the global economic crisis and its root causes; because power and profits demand it. Otherwise these elites run the serious risk of a huge slump in public confidence in the current system and even in what passes for democratic policies. As it turned out, the chair of the prestigious US law firm Sullivan & Cromwell was not far off in his prediction that ‘Wall Street, after getting billions of taxpayer dollars, will emerge from the financial crisis looking much the same as before the markets collapsed.’ Indeed it was strengthened, as explained by Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the IMF: ‘Throughout the crisis the [US] government has taken extreme care not to upset the interests of the financial institutions, or to question the basic outlines of the system that got us here.’ Moreover, the ‘elite business interests … [who] played a central role in creating the crisis, making ever-larger gambles, with the implicit backing of the government, until the inevitable collapse … are now using their influence to prevent precisely the sorts of reforms that are needed, and fast, to pull the economy out of its nosedive’ while ‘the government seems helpless, or unwilling to act against them.’ As Chomsky notes: this is ‘no surprise, at least to those who remember their Adam Smith,’ and adds, ‘The outcome was nicely captured by two adjacent front-page stores in the New York Times, headlined “$3.4 Billion Profit at Goldman Revives Gilded Pay Packages” and “In Recession, a Bleaker Path for Workers to Slog.”‘
-David Cromwell. Why Are We The Good Guys? pp 174 – 175
Cheery stuff I realize, but its good to know who is doing what to who. Perhaps during the next collapse we’ll hold the bastards accountable.




4 comments
April 26, 2016 at 6:25 am
Steve Ruis
Thanks, bought the book.
LikeLike
April 26, 2016 at 7:04 am
VR Kaine
“Perhaps during the next collapse we’ll hold the bastards accountable.”
Would be nice, wouldn’t it? Better yet, how about electing a leader or government that will BEFORE the next collapse rather than during or after it happens.
Anyways, buying the book and look forward to reading it.
@Arb: As I was looking for some new reads, I came across this one: http://deanbaker.net/images/stories/documents/End-of-Loser-Liberalism.pdf
It’s a free download, which makes me a bit cautious, but in the pitch from the site, a few things caught my attention. In particular:
“Most people define the central point of dispute between liberals and conservatives as being that liberals want the government to intervene to bring about outcomes that they consider fair, while conservatives want to leave things to the market. This is not true…
… This book describes some of the key areas in which progressives can focus their efforts to restructure markets so that more income flows to the bulk of the working population rather than just a small elite.”
Haven’t started it yet, but going to have a read of this one, too. Might be some good fodder in there for discussion or debate?
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 26, 2016 at 9:11 am
Ron Waller
The root cause of the corrupt financial system is actually monetary policy. The high-interest inflation-fighting policies of central banks from 1979 to 1995, (by the time 2% inflation targeting was put in place,) gave wealthy net savers big free-money returns on their investments. High real interest rates set the baseline for risk premiums on all other investments.
This created a “feed me Seymour” monster hungry for more free money, when central banks began easing off their anti-inflation measures that cut off the supply. That’s when the market manipulation schemes began.
First the “dot com” bubble of the late 1990s (pump, dump and short market-manipulation scheme.) This was replaced with the housing/derivatives bubble in the 2000s Bust Out: a complex web of fraud involving predatory-lending commercial bankers, trust-liquidating bond-rating agencies, Ponzi-scheming investment bankers, paper-stretching shadow bankers, Big Shorting hedge-fund managers and Masters of the Universe playing musical chairs with the global financial system.
In short, there’s a glut of capital aggressively seeking free-money returns but engaged in “financial innovation” bets that can only move money around, not create wealth from investments in the real-world economy that produce human development. (Human development that can be measured in prices is a subset of GDP. New human development GDP growth. The other part? Externality: stealing or gambling with other people’s money or future.)
Fact is we can’t wait for Paul Krugman’s “8 a.m.” call that the financial system has collapsed once again. By that time, fascists revolutions will begin breaking out which will almost certainly result in a world war we won’t walk away from.
We must take action now to end this failed neoliberal era and redirect this capital via progressive taxation to build a responsible, reliable, sustainable global economy based on a social-green implementation of Keynesian ‘New Deal’ economics. (These economics are tried-and-true having created modern living standards which were unprecedented in history.)
LikeLike
April 26, 2016 at 7:41 pm
Sha'Tara
[[Perhaps during the next collapse we’ll hold the bastards accountable.]]
Perhaps, but I don’t believe so. The brainwashed sheeple, the very same who ditched their labour unions because, well, they were run by the mob; they took too much money from the paycheck; they had corrupt leadership – insert any excuse here from the corporate hand book – haven’t suffered nearly enough to even begin to realize what was done, what is being done and what is planned to be done about workers. The new word, well, not exactly new and still politically incorrect, is serf, then slave. That’s where it’s going. When the government’s pathetic handouts and credit dry out, people will sell themselves to business and land owners just to eat and feed their families. Revolution? Not a chance, not for a long time. People aren’t willing to die for what they believe in, assuming they actually did believe in anything.
LikeLike