Our society is being influenced negatively by the consumerist culture that we, collectively, have taken our hands off the tiller and have let the market decide what is best for us and our cultures.
The idea that we can consume our way to happiness, well-being, or even a more just society would not compute without people being constantly conditioned to believe that individuality is end-goal of life. The power of community and people working together has been the dynamo that has pushed our societies forward for the benefit of everyone (well except for the status-quo) and it is this power that has been waning since corporate capitalism has kicked into high gear under the guise of neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism undermines community, collective action, and critical thought it is a stupefying tonic – that when served to the masses – creates a calm disquiet that grinds societies away, but in return keeps people isolated, fixated on themselves, and most importantly: manageable.
This piece by Nick Turse is a preface for a America’s disconnect between its citizenry and the army said citizenry supports. The dissonance is palatable as one reads the article. What should concern you is that the disconnect described has been carefully and intentionally cultivated. A feature of our current system, and most certainly not a bug .
“I can’t tell you exactly why I clicked on the article, but it was probably the title: “The Double-Tap Couple.” To me, a “double tap” is the technique of firing two gunshots in quick succession or employing two strikes in a row, as when U.S. drones or Hamas carry out attacks and then follow-up strikes to kill first-responders arriving at the scene. But this piece was about something very different. The headline referred to the popular app Instagram where you double-tap to “like” a photo.
The article turned out to be a profile of two twenty-somethings, a married couple who go by the noms de social media, FuckJerry and Beige Cardigan. They are, says author David Yi, “micro-celebrities” of the modern age. He is “tall, with a chiseled face, handsome”; she “has big doe eyes with cherub-like cheeks.” They dropped out of college and — first he and then she — became Instagram meme curators; that is, they find photos with wry or funny captions elsewhere on the internet and post them for their millions of followers. “Though both are social media sensations, neither is quite content with what they’ve accomplished,” Yi tells us. She “wants to pursue her first love, fashion, but isn’t quite sure what she’d want to do.” He’s currently cashing in with FuckJerry merchandise — hats, t-shirts, even “Vape juice.”
I read the article to the point at which FuckJerry (née Elliot Tebele) told Yi about his long slog up the Instagram follower food-chain: “It took a shit ton of time to get to, and it took a long time with a lot of work.” I stared at my phone in abject confusion. Something wasn’t right, so I scrolled to the beginning of the article and started again. But it was just the same. Justin Bieber is a fan. Followers include the “Kardashian-Jenner family.” He wears “skinny jeans and vintage Nikes.” She sports a “statement coat and a pair of sparkling Chloe boots.” Then I hit that quote: “shit ton of time… a lot of work.” I still couldn’t make sense of it and began studying the article as if it were a riddle. I read it maybe five times and again and again when I hit those phrases about time and work my brain would buckle.
At that moment, I was nearing the end of a month-long reporting stint in South Sudan and waiting to find out if I’d be able to talk to a teenage girl, a late millennial with more than memes on her mind. She had rebuffed the 60-something man her family had arranged for her to marry and her relatives had displayed their displeasure by beating her to the point of unconsciousness. That conversation never happened, but I’d already logged several weeks’ worth of interviews with shooting survivors, rape victims, mothers of murdered sons, wives of dead husbands. All this in a country where, for firewood and water — that is, the means of life — women walk desperately far distances in areas where they know that men with AK-47s may be lurking, where many are assaulted and violated by one, two, or even five men. In other words, a land where few would consider meme curation to be “a lot of work.”
I’d obviously hit that unsettling juncture where voices from home become dulled and distorted, where you feel like you’re hearing them from deep underwater. I’m talking about the vanishing point at which your first-world life collides with your crisis-zone reality — the point of disconnect. Mark Wilkerson knows it well. He found himself in just such a state, serving with the U.S. Army in civil-war-torn Somalia during the 1990s. That’s where he begins his inaugural TomDispatch piece, a rumination on his journey from soldier to veteran to chronicler of the all-too-brief life of another veteran, in his recent and moving book, Tomas Young’s War.
I eventually gave up on Yi’s article, unsure why I couldn’t understand the life and times of FuckJerry. After I got back to the U.S., however, I signed up for Instagram and took a look at his account and Yi’s story began to make more sense to me, if only in a tragi-comic way. Later in the piece, he writes of his subjects being “caught in the maelstrom” when a competitor is criticized for “stealing” memes. It’s a strange society that produces both meme maelstroms and, in distant lands, lethal ones that leave millions dead, maimed, desperate, or displaced. So before you become FuckJerry’s 9,200,001st follower, let Wilkerson guide you through slivers of two American conflicts, their aftermaths, and the points of disconnect along the way.”
–Nick Turse’s Preface to Batman in a Hospital Bed by Mark Wilkerson @Tom’s Dispatch
The disconnection that Turse illustrates resonates with me enough though to make it the focus of my article, however Wilkerson’s article is also very good, so I recommend following the link.



18 comments
June 15, 2016 at 6:50 am
roughseasinthemed
Wow Arb. There is so much to think about there. Shall I add some related ones? Ethical consumerism perhaps? Let alone not living in the eyes and lives of vapid celebrities. The disconnect is wider than the army though, Turse nails it nicely when he says individualism has become paramount. Self first, last and always. Greed. Wanting more for less yet at the same time buying designer products. Spending vast amounts of time tweeting and insting. Leaves me cold.
At least in my part of the world Brexit has got people focusing on the economy, politicians’ lies, and what a political change could mean. Or maybe that’s just the people I know. The relevance is that feed the people the latest opium (fifteen minutes of internet fame) they might not think about real issues.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 15, 2016 at 8:46 am
syrbal-labrys
I admit, I find the phenomenon of Internet life peculiar. Some time back, we had a younger couple who lost their lease and jobs stay with us for a while. They were wildly tragic a couple WEEKS later — when, online, someone stole their online GAMING profiles/identities. Let’s just say one of my eyebrows was permanently raised by that sort of life prioritization!
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 15, 2016 at 10:04 am
The Arbourist
@RSiTM
Is that even possible? Not to sound flip, but the level of income required to ‘ethically consume’ means (usually) that one must be fairly deep in the belly of the beast to have those choices available.
Meh. :/ Systemic problems suck.
It seems that the entertainment media has refined its methodology and is very good at foregrounding the superficial drama of celebrities and manufacturing their importance in the minds of many. It is a keenly specific focus as their are celebrities that agitate against the system – Woody Harrison (for worse) and Patrick Stewart (for better) come from top of mind. But their message resonates on a small scale because of going through social media, rather than the machinations of the mainstream. Neither of the actors views ‘resonate’ with the mainstream, so they go largely uncovered.
The feature that is most trouble in the varying amount of coverage is that it is a conscious choice to focus on the vapid and superficial.
The system knows what it needs to continue to exist – people caring about people – community (on whichever scale) – is not on the approved list of ways to further capitalism.
Not very much can be said in 140 characters. Certainly the odd pithy quote (I’ve featured some on this blog), but dialogue that is going to change people and society, not so much.
For once I would like to see the free trade deals in public so they can be scrutinized by our politicians and experts in the public arena. Every ‘free-trade’ agreement on the books so far has always prioritized the business class and their particular views and needs in society. We need less ‘free-investor agreements (NAFTA, TPP)’ and more actual free trade agreements that benefit all sectors of society.
I’m not current on the EU’s plan vis a vis Britain, but I suspect that more clarity in the beginning would have helped head of the current furor over a possible Brexit.
A population whose natural empathy toward other human beings that was nourished instead of starved would be bad news for large swaths of hugely profitable activities.
That, of course, is unacceptable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 15, 2016 at 10:10 am
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
Agreed.
What is real anymore? Is it family, social bonds and how we treat each other or is it the perceptions of others and our ‘identities’ that should take precedence?
Well, that went existential rather quickly… :/
Unsurprisingly so.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 15, 2016 at 10:58 am
roughseasinthemed
@ Arb
What? To buy a bimonthly magazine that tells you who supports arms, nuclear power, abuses workers’ rights, animal rights, funds certain political parties, etc.
It’s £30 a year now. Twenty plus years ago, it was around £12. Maybe? Dunno.
http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/aboutus.aspx
It was better back then (aren’t things always) than it is now.
But, by buying that magazine I could inform my shopping choices. And, know when I was making the wrong choices.
We are talking about capitalism here, right? So if, we don’t vote with our feet … ?
The other perspective is, ‘oh, I can’t afford it. I must have it!’
Not me. No money. Do without. Still want to do the deep in the belly comment?
Life’s complex. We choose our priorities. I don’t choose to fund unethical companies when I can avoid it. Sure, within financial restrictions. There are ways and means around everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 15, 2016 at 11:10 am
VR Kaine
Great article, Arb – shows such a contrast, doesn’t it? I liked Bill Maher’s skewering of “Socialist Millenials” last week which speaks along the lines of this article – what much of society has become accustomed to where things like “a lot of work” is concerned. (Apologizing in advance if this link posts and entire video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrfbWtMgyk8)
It’s also interesting what you said here:
“Our society is being influenced negatively by the consumerist culture that we, collectively, have taken our hands off the tiller and have let the market decide what is best for us and our cultures.”
I am ultimately a market advocate for most things based upon the idea that “the market” is (should be) driven by rational forces where two rational parties meet to exchange items of equal value. However, that’s not to say that I don’t realize or acknowledge that “the market” is in fact driven by a bunch of irrational forces that push the entire system (and society) into shitsville.
We just keep letting our greed and insatiable desire for “comfort” dictate what we think we need, regardless of the consequences to ourselves or anyone else.
It’s not even millennials, either – I have a 55 year old relative who’s about to be destitute, yet she insists on only either applying for, or taking a job that “suits her”, and by suits her I mean “I have to have a job where I’m happy, or what’s the point?” Um, how about the point is basic food and shelter?
And out of all of my relatives, guess which one is the biggest Youtube watcher, Facebook commenter, and tabloid reader? Yep, it’s her.
LikeLiked by 2 people
June 16, 2016 at 3:27 pm
The Arbourist
@Vern
It is rather unfortunate. Perhaps we have been saddled with not the socio-economic system we need, but rather, the one we deserve.
LikeLike
June 16, 2016 at 5:42 pm
VR Kaine
For sure, just as in politics.
There are very few true leaders out there willing to risk much and make the hard decisions – i.e. those who tell us what we should want like Steve Jobs did with the cell phone, as a commercial example, or what Lincoln or Johnson did with civil rights, as a political one.
The rest, then, simply give in to not so much the will of the people but the whims of the people so that the people can continue to give them control. Why be leaders ourselves when we’re continually being satisfied?
And while the peoples’ irrational needs are being satisfied, what happens? Most will start to think that things are either are fine, or too much of a problem to try and change so they don’t challenge the pseudo-leaders that are feeding the status quo.
Applies to any number of issues – women’s rights, pornography/exploitation, video games and violence, gun laws, and even basic politics and basic business.
I do believe we as individual citizens and consumers are at most fault for this, since the only people who can truly shut off our “give a shit” switches are us.
Apple just announced Ios 10. Any word on the happenings at Foxconn? No one wants to know – we’ve experienced “hardship” (going back to the point of the article) and now Apple is satiating us with those cool new features coming out that we’ve soooo long been waiting for! We won’t start caring about third-world labor and Foxconn again until we get mad at Apple or Samsung for not releasing a new phone. :)
LikeLike
June 17, 2016 at 11:03 am
The Arbourist
@Vern
I watched the Maher segment, was appalled by his casual use of the system of exploitation that is pornography, but came away with his two points. He advocates against ‘Free’ Healthcare and ‘Free’ College tuition referring to them as Santa-ism as opposed to socialism.
Now often, I do like me some Bill Maher, especially when he goes off on the perverse nature of the fractured American body politic. However, in this case, I think he is quite off base with his observations.
The US healthcare system as is, is an affront to its citizenry. It is over-priced, inefficient and does not serve the peoples needs, furthermore from either perspective – socialist or capitalist it needs to be reformed. A single payer healthcare system the world over has mostly shown better results and at a lower societal and economic cost to the people of said society.
In the US though, the political system necessarily promotes what is best for the investor class, and not the people, and thus the inefficient and ineffective kludge that is the American healthcare system wobbles onward – working very well for the monied few – but quite poorly for everyone else. This isn’t rhetoric, but I think pretty close to the truth.
We can see Bill Maher fulfill his role in media in limiting the debate on what is ‘reasonable’ to discuss in the public sphere and what is not. Single payer healthcare is a delusion fantasy for him and must be derided because, despite the fact that the rest of the western industrialized world has it, it is clearly out of bounds for serious discussion.
To seriously have this discussion in America is close to impossible because revamping the system would require a hard look at the current expenditure patterns of the US government. Redirecting a small portion of the Imperial Offense Budget toward the people to give them, what should be a basic human right, is clearly not acceptable to those who hold power in the US, despite the fact that public opinion is in favour of such a system.
Similar treatment can be applied to the free college tuition notion. The real discussion lies in the ‘guns vs butter’ debate, that in the current imperial status of the US, is a debate that the forces of the status quo are desperately trying not to have.
LikeLike
June 17, 2016 at 11:08 am
The Arbourist
@RSitM
Perhaps I’m being too negative, but it is seems that there are similiarities between ethical consumerism and empowering femininity. It is not that better choices cannot be made, but rather the select spectrum of choices that are made available to us via the capitalist system.
I mean, it is all fine and well to choose less exploitative options, but does it address the base question of the current economic situation – should exploitation exist at all?
LikeLike
June 17, 2016 at 12:02 pm
VR Kaine
Hi Arb,
“He advocates against ‘Free’ Healthcare and ‘Free’ College tuition referring to them as Santa-ism as opposed to socialism.”
Actually, Maher has been all for single-payer health care. Regarding “free” college tuition, I don’t believe he believes in actually having free tuition, but at the same time he was a huge Sanders supporter throughout the campaign so I can’t be sure.
Regardless, I think his point simply was that Millenials feel they shouldn’t have to pay for anything ever, and the laziness that gets ingrained along with that – using comedic exaggerations to make his point.
And on his “casual use” of pornography, yes he does it but he also does it with drugs when talking about pot laws and pedo issues when referring to one of your arch-enemies, the Catholic Church, so I usually try and keep in mind that he’s a comedian using comedy to make his points – wherein everything will be (and should be) offensive to at least some degree to force us to look at the stupidity of some of our positions.
LikeLike
June 17, 2016 at 1:28 pm
VR Kaine
Re: redirecting the “Offense Budget” – right now, you can blame the Derkaderkas plus Putin for all that. They keep giving the US an excuse to rachet up its military spending.
LikeLike
June 19, 2016 at 5:50 am
robert browning
Great stuff Arb, as usual, – a topic that goes “to the heart of the matter”. It took days to get time to finish the article and now i see many agreeable comments and replies. Except for Kane who seems to come to conclusions that are based on dubious premises. Two points straight away: That 55 yr old can do whatever she likes in her leisure time as I’m sure the need for food and shelter will prevail in the end and i applaud that she has standards and isn’t chasing the buck and all of what that entails; And while Putin is probably awful, the CIA is too- probably worse. Since the 1940s, the CIA( for the capitalists) have created this world wide environment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 19, 2016 at 6:05 am
roughseasinthemed
@ Arb. No. I agree with you. I’m the Rhett Butler for lost causes: environmentalism, socialism (rather than what passes for it), animal rights, radical feminism, workers’ rights, and I’m sure I’ve forgotten something. I just have an annoying conscience that tells me to do something however small. But of course, yes to narrow choices, yes to exploitation. Also yes to an unthinking selfish public.
On the other topic raised in comments, ie health care and education: I was lucky enough to get free tuition and living grants. And have lived in state-run health care countries. Education and health care and fundamental rights, are not a god damn fucking privilege. They are also two significant services that deprive women of advancement when they aren’t adequately provided. I’ll shut up on that one, but it’s not rocket science.
Imperial Offense Budget? Succinct and accurate. The world’s current biggest colonialist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 19, 2016 at 8:21 am
The Arbourist
@RSitM
You too eh? :) Well I’m glad there are others that are busily draining the ocean, one teaspoon at time.
Absolutely. It would be nice if our leadership shared that particular vision.
But who would provide the free labour and unpaid care??
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 19, 2016 at 8:23 am
The Arbourist
@robert browning
Thanks. I like to share the most depressing stuff I find here on the blog. I never run out of material…
LikeLike
June 19, 2016 at 8:25 am
The Arbourist
@Vern
Blame imperial over-reach for lack of funding on the homefront? Yes, I believe I can do that. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
June 20, 2016 at 9:09 am
VR Kaine
You’re trying to conflate two separate things there, but you already know that. :)
Over-spending on a past war America never should have gotten into in the first place is one thing (Iraq 2), but current events are another. Live in the “now”: what do you think should happen when Putin’s invading countries and doing 50ft “fly-by’s” on American air carriers? Give in to Putin and pull those carriers out of the region?
And what do you think the response should be when derkaderkas go and shoot up their coworkers, or a gay night club, or when loser-liberals riot in the streets over Trump? Less armored police? Less armored SWAT teams and personnel carriers? Less attacks on the derkaderka radicals in the middle east that these dipshits are claiming allegiance to? (Oh, right – you want them all to be left alone.) Or support the joke that this Administration labels as “Containment”?
In the end, pacifist loser-Liberal thinking is just as much to blame for the racheting up of arms as hawkish thinking is in my opinion. Both lead to brutality – the only difference is that pacifists wait until AFTER the bodies stack up, not before. Just look at what your side did with the Nazi’s. How did that go? The same now with ISIS – all the Chamberlains who say that we should just leave them alone while gays are getting tossed off of buildings, women are burned and beaten, and little kids (boys or girls) are being raped. Don’t spend money extinguishing that – instead, spend it on free college here at home for a bunch of spoiled, entitled, bums who don’t have a clue? Is that your position? If it is, then it just affirms my belief that pacifists truly don’t give a shit if people die – they just try and act like they do because their phony morality depends on it.
Stopping ISIS and free college or “free” healthcare for everybody are two separate things.
That said, though, neither a far-right or a far-left approach is the solution in my opinion. In both cases ideology trumps practicality and common-sense, plus they both hate math.
Hillary has too many business interests abroad to change the status quo (no one has heard of the Carlyle Group lately, have they?) and Trump (even though I don’t think he’s going to be elected) – even Israel or Canada would want to bomb him he pisses people off so much with his rhetoric and arrogance. I honestly could see Putin being just as bold with Trump militarily as he has been with Obama because he’d know that Trump can’t play the diplomatic game – Putin would play Trump like a flute. So would China, both militarily and diplomatically. Trump would be an Imperialist and he’d take the world to a very bad place.
So I guess we settle for Hillary’s lies, false positions, and egregious pocket-lining? It’s going to be an interesting 4 or 8 years, either way. :)
LikeLike