This post from the garrulous hodgepodge of turds known as ‘ihatesocialjusticewarrors’ manages to test the very boundaries of quantum physics – the stupid here is so super-dense that the Planck constant just may not apply. The original buffoonery can be found at ihatesocialjusticewarriors.com. The dumb is strong at this site, consider yourself warned. :)
“There is a widely held belief that feminism is a movement for equality between men and women. This is inaccurate and a misconception.”
Whaaat? These two sentences are true. Feminism is the movement to liberate women from the detrimental constraints of patriarchal society. Might we have common ground between DWR and ‘IHATESOCIALJUSTICEWARRIORS’?
???
Wait for it.
“Feminism is actually a form of sexism.”
And *boom* goes my head into the desk.
“Feminism views women as inherently inferior to men, no different than the traditional ‘sexists’ they are actively engaged in fighting against.”
Not. Even. Close.
Feminists are in the business of analyzing, deconstructing, and critiquing the patriarchal society that women are forced to live in. The goal of feminism is to eradicate the patriarchal superstructure that society is based upon; the very same patriarchy that damages both women and men.
Women are treated as inferiors in society because the patriarchal status quo, not because of any inherent inferiority.
Happy to clear that up for you.
“Feminism doesn’t encourage women to be as efficient as men, but rather they attempt to adjust policies to accommodate women. This isn’t equality. Instead it’s making the determination that being a woman is a handicap and special rules need to apply.”
What does being ‘efficient like a man’ look like? It looks like you are implying that men are the default normal setting in society and, that if women could just be more ‘man-like’ they would do better. Of course, the idea that default human = man, is the sorta of bullshit that feminists have been fighting against since the founding of the movement.
Adjusting policies? You mean supporting structural changes that move toward levelling the playing field? We certainly cannot have any of that.
The common thread running through so much of the feminist backlash is the wacky idea that equality is somehow achievable with the current state of affairs. The problem with this analysis (other than its made of certified grade A bullshit) is that it ignores the structural reality of society. Society is heavily tilted toward favouring men. How could it not be, as men are the primary architects of society, so why would they not craft it in their favour?
Axiomatically speaking, no egalitarian solution can be reached until patriarchy has been dismantled.
It is known that being female *is* a handicap in society. Females are not taken seriously, not given bodily autonomy, not paid as much, and for the most part relegated to the sex class to be objectified by the ‘default humans’ a.k.a men. Not exactly carnival fun times for the double XX caste.
“If feminists truly believed that women were equal to men, then there would be no motivation nor reason for them to implement, or to push to implement, special rules or adjust any of the policies that govern workforce requirements or productivity.”
Because not challenging the status quo will somehow fix the status quo…
1. Observe differential treatment on the basis of sex.
2. Do nothing about it.
3. …
4. Profit! – Sweet sweet egalitarianism for all!
C. *thud* *gasp* Need ASA stat, head sore from repeated desk impacts.
“Let’s face it, feminism is just a different form of sexism.”
Maybe in your imaginary world reverse racism(?) exists as well, but back here in reality feminism really isn’t sexist, as it attempts to directly address sexism in society and fix said problem.
“It’s also misogynistic in that it attempts to put unrealistic demands onto average women and it denies the very nature of what a woman is and how nature designed her.”
Aww f*ck, it is all about the fluff pink lady brains isn’t it? Along with the migrating wombs and bouts of hysteria – women had better just shuffle back to the kitchen before more male egos are hurt and privileges are threatened. It’s not patriarchy that is holding women back, but rather biology that makes females inferior…
*thud thud thud thud*
“Feminists hate women and want them to be men instead. There, somebody finally came out and just said what we were all thinking.🙂”
Feminists want to see the structures in society that mandate differential treatment based on body type erased. Feminists have no desire to become the oppressor class, rather they seek to redress the fundamental imbalances in society.
And there you have it gentle readers, your dose of deconstructed ass-hat misogyny for the day.





10 comments
September 26, 2016 at 6:32 am
roughseasinthemed
You do find ’em.
Not only are feminists sexist, blacks are racist too. I suppose the ‘logic’ in that thinking shouldn’t surprise. Yeah, I ignored your warning and visited.
Sounded trite and ill-informed – I’m feeling moderate in my criticism today.
My main gripe is assuming all feminists are SJWs. The amount of radfems who dislike SJWs because of their libfem stance is a good indicator. But IHSJW seems to be all about I hate anything that I don’t like or doesn’t affect me personally.
I really don’t think feminists want women to be men. At all. We merely want equality of opportunity to earn a living, equal access to health care and education, and as well as equal rights under the law, we’s like to see that translated into actuality in societal attitudes (ha!).
We are hardly suggesting that men shouldn’t have control over their bodies, should be restricted to inferior jobs because of their lack of intellect … although … Nor are we suggesting that men are trafficked, pimped, assaulted, raped, abused, etc. Why on earth would we want anyone to suffer like that?
But that’s just my pink lady brain cooking. Er, thinking. Must get back to the domestic duties.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 8:11 am
john zande
efficient like a man
???
What does history teach us about this effeciency?
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 8:43 am
Steve Ruis
You do know the old argument about arguing with a pig … ? Basically you just brought some idiot’s bilge onto a quality site .
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 9:23 am
The Arbourist
@Steven Ruis
That’s me, wrestling with the dirty misogynistic pigs of wordpress, so you don’t have to. :) Admittedly ‘ihatesoc..”s rhetoric is stupid of the straightforward variety – it’s hard to find the interesting stupid all the time. :)
LikeLike
September 26, 2016 at 9:28 am
syrbal-labrys
Damn, and here I thought Monday morning headaches were meant to result from weekend Scotch parties!
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 9:40 am
The Arbourist
@RSitM
“Sounded trite and ill-informed – I’m feeling moderate in my criticism today.”
Misogyny, like ice cream, comes in so many wonderful flavours. :/
I’m thinking nuance and charitably regarding ones ideological foes are not particularly high on “IHSJW”‘s list. :> More like, let’s watch the “amazing atheist” on youtube and then parrot the numbskullery in another medium.
SJW proper often suffer from the same sort of malaise that IHSJW does, naively embracing the concept of ‘equality’ without the lens of material reality and theory, all the while drinking the neo-liberal individualistic Kool-aid leads them far from doing much if any useful feminism.
Men have ruined the world. Not exactly a high bar of achievement to aspire to. Agreed and well said. :)
Whew! I was wondering when the pink would kick in, gender roles being innate and all that…
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 9:41 am
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
*snort*..:)
LikeLike
September 26, 2016 at 9:44 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
Whoa whoa whoa, sir!
You are assuming a cross disciplinary approach is even remotely possible from the ‘IHSJW’ end.
Your charity sir, you wear it on your sleeve. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 26, 2016 at 12:44 pm
Miep
You appear 2 have found yerself sum MRA’s.
LikeLiked by 2 people
September 26, 2016 at 4:44 pm
Francois Tremblay
Yea I want women to be men.
…
No.
And it seems turning men into women just turns them into even bigger assholes, generally. But I admire those who don’t.
LikeLiked by 1 person