Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie – Naming the Problem: Gender
April 10, 2017 in Feminism | Tags: Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Effective Feminism, Feminism, Gender | by The Arbourist
Well said Ms.Adichie.
Well said Ms.Adichie.
Your opinions…
The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Government expected to announce it's scrapping EV mandate in favour of new fuel efficiency system: source
- ICE agents are in Canada. Here's what they can — and can’t — do
- New Cuba travel advisory urges 'high degree of caution.' Should Canadians worry?
- Carney’s government is cutting hundreds of environment and science jobs. Here’s what that means for Canadians
- Man convicted of trying to kill Donald Trump on his Florida golf course gets life in prison
- Tate McRae receives backlash for supporting Team USA in NBC Olympics ad
- Quebec fisherman reels in 244-pound, record-breaking Atlantic halibut — for science
- IOC may move Winter Games to January to get more snow
- Conservative MP Jivani heads to Washington after Liberals snub offer to collaborate
- Mother of missing N.S. children ‘taking it day by day,’ say loved ones
Posts I Like
Blogs I Follow
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
2 comments
April 11, 2017 at 1:56 pm
Vesuvius R. Kaine
Well said, however are so many words needed to explain something so simple? Natural birth is natural birth, trans is trans. I will forever be a natural-born Canadian and nothing can change that, and someone who is a (legal) immigrant should be afforded rights accordingly (resident vs. citizen).
Strange (dare I say ridiculous) to be pushing not only the same rights but the same experience (suffrage) as someone designer-made vs. natural borne. Wannabe syndrome, perhaps?
LikeLike
April 11, 2017 at 2:02 pm
Vesuvius R. Kaine
Oops – duplicate. Was trying to edit and add a sentence the first paragraph re: natural born Canadian vs. immigrant – that there will always be a difference, even if similar rights can or should be appropriately awarded.
It just seems that like that idiot Rachel Dolezal, people are trying to hijack other peoples’ natural identities (and seemingly trying to jump on the perpetual victim-wagon at the same time?) Don’t think that’s right.
LikeLike