If there is anything that will enrage men more is women speaking out against their view of the world. The first class citizens get mighty mad when the second class start challenging their assertions and interpretations of the world.
This post delves into the war of words that is currently raging between transactivists and radical feminists in the wake of the Vancouver Women’s March.
It starts with one courageous individual at the Women’s march who expressed herself via a sign which, of course, was immediately labelled ‘transphobic’ and caused much consternation for certain trans identified males involved with the march.
Keep in mind the woman’s only ‘crime’ is expressing her opinion while at a Women’s march.
So then this happened. One fine TIM (trans identified male) decided he wanted to go after this woman carrying a sign at the protest. This next screen shot is from The Feminist Current.
We pick up the conversation on twitter between Meghan Murphy and Morgane Oger.
The battle against transactivism is being fought now. Patriarchy 2.0 is happening and Meghan Murphy along with other feminists are on the front lines defending women and the right to speak the truth about their bodies and experiences.
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
3 comments
February 3, 2018 at 12:16 pm
Miep
Material reality is the one thing we all have in common. The transgender lobby’s aim is to outlaw public expression of the belief that material reality thus should be the basis of our understanding of the world and our social and legal systems. This lobby masquerades as intersex disorders, it plays with sex stereotypes, but ultimately it is about making abstractions primary in these contexts and brutally silencing anyone who insists on the primacy of material reality. Thus does it act as a form of religious enforcement.
LikeLiked by 2 people
February 3, 2018 at 12:24 pm
The Arbourist
@ Miep
The comparison to religion seems quite apt, as many religions have a system of identifying dissenting views and marginalizing them.
This trend is worrisome as concepts that TA’s won’t define are being codified into law.
Also galling is that women are still having to agitate to attempt to be recognized as full human beings with rights to their bodies and reproductive systems. :/
LikeLiked by 1 person
February 3, 2018 at 12:39 pm
Miep
I don’t see how women can legally agitate for our rights when the word that was used to define us materially now can mean “men.” It makes it impossible to do stuff like introduce the ERA, because if there is no legal distinction between men and women, such an amendment would be rendered meaningless.
As far as religion goes, either it’s based on the belief in sexed souls (innately religious) or sexed personalities (based on sex stereotypes). It’s not about intersex or developmental disorders, and in any case, damage done to a male or female human does not change one’s sex. This last is patriarchy talking, in fact. If a man isn’t manly he’s “a woman.” Patriarchy doesn’t like the reversal, though, the idea that a damaged woman becomes a man, so “trans men” don’t get much traction by comparison. Female transitioners are often operating in a kind of stealth mode to avoid male harassment, whereas male transitioners are much more likely to relentlessly draw attention to themselves as trans, as, in fact, men.
LikeLiked by 1 person