Who the hell is on this board and why do they think that the destruction of female boundaries and privacy is good thing?
“The vast majority of reported sexual assaults at public swimming pools in the UK take place in unisex changing rooms, new statistics reveal.
The data, obtained through a Freedom of Information request by the Sunday Times, suggests that unisex changing rooms are more dangerous for women and girls than single-sex facilities.
Just under 90 per cent of complaints regarding changing room sexual assaults, voyeurism and harassment are about incidents in unisex facilities.”
It’s like the board just decided that the safety of girls and women doesn’t matter.
“The same month saw yet another school, in Midlothian, changing the toilets to unisex while everyone was on holiday. The result: more girls embarrassed to use the toilets, holding urine in all day and scared to go to school when they have just started their periods. In this case we also have boys peeing in the sinks. Parents are once again understandably angry:
“ANGRY parents have told how children went back to their Midlothian primary school after half-term to find the toilets had been made unisex.
“Mothers said daughters, including some who had started their periods, were now embarrassed to use the facilities at Mayfield Primary while boys have been spotted urinating in the sinks.
“A mother-of-three from Mayfield who has an eight-year-old daughter at the school said parents only found out on Wednesday when pupils returned from the break.
“She’s totally embarrassed,” said the 32-year-old.
“A lot of the kids were just waiting until they got home because they were too embarrassed to go to the toilet.
“The kids were off for the break and returned to school and when they were walking home, they said there were boys in the toilet.”
“I was really horrified. My little girl said the boys were carrying on and peeing in the sinks. Girls obviously mature quicker than boys.”
“Parents should be told. All the parents are not comfortable with it. They’re not happy about it at all. They think their kids are too young for this.”
“Some of the Primary 7 girls are starting their periods and they have to take sanitary products to the toilet with them.”
“Wee girls shouldn’t be going to school and feeling embarrassed to go to the toilet – it’s hard enough at that age.”
“Another parent, of a ten-year-old girl at Mayfield, said:
“My girl’s just started her period and I can’t send her to school if she’s on her period because she’s too scared.”
“I understand about equality and diversity and trying to make it equal for transgender but, I’m sorry, they’re primary school kids.”
It seems that schools have been misled about Equality law. ‘Inclusion’ and ‘exclusion’ are equally legitimate strategies to achieve equality, sometimes one is needed and sometimes the other. In the case of toilets, exclusion of the opposite sex has always been policy in order to ensure privacy for both sexes and for the safeguarding of girls.
In the case of toilets, the results of a policy of ‘inclusion’ are clear: the removal of the right to privacy for both sexes and discrimination against the sex with the greater need for privacy: girls.Mixed-sex or gender neutral toilets are not working for obvious reasons which should have been considered by schools before implementing this experiment on pupils.”
It will now be up to BC parents to force these faux-progessives to walk back their attack on girls privacy and boundaries while in school. Stand up, get involved and protect your children’s right to privacy and safety in school.
6 comments
April 25, 2022 at 8:07 am
tildeb
Eventually, maybe people will begin to see what’s really going on: every ‘progressive’ policy of ‘inclusion’ under the banner of trans ‘rights’ means a regressive policy of step by step exclusion of rights for females. Every. Single. Time.
We can see the power of coopting and corrupting the meaning of words (like ‘inclusion’ and ‘rights’) and the hostile takeover of the language in order for the ideologues to separate the negative effects that arise in reality from imposing a malignant ideology on everyone where the heart of it is for privilege for some rather than equality for all. We’re going along with nice sounding words and thinking well of ourselves for doing so, assuming we’re promoting equality rather than privilege but accomplishing exactly the opposite. That’s how this works. And privileging some means discriminating against others (shhh… no one needs to hear the truth).
Females are once again expected to yield and accept the dominance of men’s choices because… well… to do otherwise makes you a bigot and transphobe. Perhaps that’s why many women, in fact, are the greatest ‘champions’ of transactivists and anti-female practices because they receive public applause and awarded higher virtue status for doing so. They’re so compassionate donchaknow.
So everyone else should just shut up, pretend there’s no harm, and go along or you’re a bad person.
Heads, transactivists win; tails, transactivists win. Once the language has been ideologically conquered, it’s game over. Who cares about half the world’s population when it comes to being ‘on the right side of history’? But seriously, who in their right mind would want to be a female in such a society?
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 26, 2022 at 7:54 am
southernpov
I keep seeing this blog on Progressive Bloggers. How’d that happen?
Is there no Regressive Bloggers site or perhaps a Reactionary Bloggers group where you’d find a more receptive audience?
:-)
LikeLike
April 26, 2022 at 11:03 am
The Arbourist
Thanks for your opinion. If defending female rights, boundaries, and safety in society isn’t progressive enough for you I’m not sure what else can be said.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 26, 2022 at 12:29 pm
lovetruthcourage
Excluding women and girls is a feature not a bug.
LikeLike
April 27, 2022 at 9:44 am
Michelle
I feel so bad for those adolescent girls having to navigate menstruation in a unisex bathroom. . Also I bet that a lot of boys aren’t thrilled about sharing washrooms with girls either. The only bathrooms that should be unisex are ones designed for single use.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 27, 2022 at 10:16 am
The Arbourist
@Michelle
I agree. There is nothing wrong with Unisex bathrooms as long as there are single sex bathrooms readily available. Women and men deserve spaces away from the other sex.
LikeLiked by 1 person