Kara Dansky on DGR Resistance Radio

Arb, the unwritten rule is that to question or criticize the abusive trans movement means you must be a right wing evangelical fascist authoritarian. Reasons? Pfft. Why should anyone listen to a right wing evangelical fascist authoritarian?

See how this works? Tolerance and respect for diversity means tolerating exactly one ‘approved’ ideology diverse from all the wrong ones. That makes you the Other, as in “for you and yours.” Southernpov cares not at all about what you actually think, what your opinions actually are; none of it matters because the commentator has slotted you into the ‘correct’ Other category and so already knows with certainty just how terrible a person you must be to dare to disagree with the trans movement. Not for one second did this commentator bother to listen and learn from the speaker and so remains clueless that he/she has demonstrated being part of the problem, a willing yet intolerant abuser and enabler of an ideology truly hostile to what’s true, what’s real, and what is respectful.

LikeLiked by 1 person

I’m a big fan of discourse. I want to know why someone thinks what they do because sometimes the reasons for doing so are better informed than my own for a contrary opinion. When I then change my mind and say as much, I always thank the person for taking the time and going to the trouble of offering me an opportunity to learn, to change my mind due to better reasons, and this seems to cause a great deal of surprise and some level of shock. Isn’t that a shame.

This is why we have a history if discourse and explanations here on DWR that have at times been at odds. That’s a good thing. How boring would it be if everyone agreed about everything all the time? Where could learning ever happen? It takes a rather large dose of ego to assume all is known already.

And so the absence of honest discourse with the ideologues of the woke who name call rather than honestly engage with respect demonstrates exactly zero learning. SPV has no attachment in reality, in truth, to what s/he is saying about you. Just the drive-by smear.

In the world of the ideologue like SPV, there is no qualitative difference between accusation and judgement… and “you and yours” have been found guilty by SPV so that becomes what’s true to SPV even if it is patently and demonstrably wrong as it is in fact. Your sidebar easily demonstrates that. So it’s my experience that facts don’t matter to the faith-addled. Belief in the certainty of one’s faith is everything to the dedicated ideologue. So there is no common language left for discourse, for learning, because only the uncritical blind acceptance of the faith – the One True Faith, let’s be clear – counts in such an alternate faith-based reality.

LikeLiked by 1 person