You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Canada’ category.
This is a case of the Educational system, although technically right, is looking very stupid and out of touch with reality when it comes to giving zeros to students who have not done their work. It is shameful though that a veteran teacher is going to lose his job over the issue.
“The Edmonton physics teacher who broke school policy by giving zeros to his students has decided not to appeal his suspension.
Lynden Dorval, a 35-year teaching veteran, had until Friday to file an appeal. He consulted with a lawyer who told him that based on past cases, his odds of winning are slim — a position also taken by the Alberta Teachers’ Association.”
Fighting the system is never cheap. The economic requirements essentially make the appeal process a joke.
“There’s a rare chance, or small chance, that I may have to pay for the whole hearing if I lose,” Dorval said on Friday. “I can’t take that kind of hit.”
Dorval became a hero to many for refusing to comply with the so-called ‘no-zero’ policy for incomplete assignments and missed tests at Edmonton’s Ross Sheppard High School.
We should seize the spirit of the Montreal protests and hold a demonstration to show our support for Mr.Dorval. It won’t happen because, unlike Quebec, the atomization and “me first” attitude quashes most impulses of solidarity before they begin.
“The thinking behind the policy, which was adopted by the school a year and a half ago, is that a failure to complete assignments is a behavourial issue, and marks should reflect ability, not behaviour.
But Dorval believes not giving zeros tells students that they don’t need to be accountable for their actions.”
The EPSB completely dropped that ball on this one. The PR that is dominating the news is almost completely negative against them. The issue of accountability is one that most people out of school can quickly and easily relate to. It spurs the gut reaction and the quick media analysis, as people tune out the explanation of why the board has a no zero policy in this particular school.
It should be a lesson to the Administration of the school and the superintendent as how not deal with an issue. This should have been resolved in house, because the nuance involved in putting forth their position is a no-win PR proposition.
“Dorval admits he first wondered if it was right to take a stand. But the response he’s received since then — calls, emails and letters from complete strangers, and talks with frustrated teachers — has validated his decision.
“It certainly has made my resolve even stronger than ever because the support I’m getting from people is just unbelievable,” he said.
Last week, Dorval said that he spoke out because as a 35-year veteran, he could retire and live on his pension if he lost his job, a price he expects to pay for speaking out.
He still hopes he can return to teaching, even on a part-time basis, once his suspension is complete.”
People of principle are hard to come by these days, I think Mr.Dorval would be an asset to any school that employs him.
It is one of those lifetime events, as Venus rarely crosses the plane of our orbit while in front of the sun.
“Our nearest planetary neighbour will be passing between the Earth and the sun starting at 6:04 p.m. ET on June 5 and will be aligned in such a way that its passage will be visible with the naked eye. The transit, as it’s known, will last about six hours, but in most parts of Canada, it will be visible for only a few hours before sunset.”
That doesn’t happen very often because most of the time when Venus crosses Earth’s orbital plane, Earth is somewhere else in its orbit, so there is no direct sight line from Earth to Venus and the Sun
“Earth orbits the sun slower than Venus. If they both orbited in the same plane, like runners running around a track, then every time Venus ‘lapped’ Earth, there would be a transit,” Reid said.
“However, Venus’s orbit is ’tilted’ relative to Earth’s orbit, so the only way Venus and Earth can line up with the sun is if Venus laps Earth exactly when Venus happens to be passing through the plane of Earth’s orbit.
“That only occurs at two points in Venus’s orbit (the two points where the ring of Venus’s orbit ‘punctures’ Earth’s orbit). The odds of Venus happening to be at one of those two points when it ‘laps’ Earth are small.”
As with the annular eclipse that dazzled millions of people around the world on May 20, the key to viewing the transit of Venus safely is to avoid looking directly at the sun without a protected lens. Sunglasses or ordinary telescope lenses are not enough to protect the eyes.
To be safe, lenses must be treated with something like an aluminized film like Mylar or have a strong filter such as the type found on some welder’s glasses. The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada lists a number of safe lens options in a special section of its website devoted to the transit.
Whatever viewing method you choose, the key, says Reid, is to not miss what will be your last chance to see Venus in transit.
“It will not occur again until 2117, so it’s worth trying to see it,” Reid said.
Democracy in Action – Look and Learn my sleeping obedient country.
The protests in Quebec are an example to the rest of Canada to what an active citizenry is like and how people can affect change in the political spectrum. At the time of this writing, 39 days of protest are on record. Thirty nine days of showing Canadians that people still do have a place Canadian politics. The real lesson though is that this political space is never given freely, it is earned by the mass momentum of people demanding and then taking their place in the debate. This is the very lifeblood of democracy; yet our elites and media however cannot seem to do much more than sneer and dismiss the people of Quebec. The next level of protest is coming as the Grand Prix is coming to Montreal, and the protesters might squeeze the cash flow of the event. Action must be taken as the business elites must have their way.
“The prospect of continued protests following this week’s breakdown of talks to end the Quebec student crisis has Premier Jean Charest and Montreal Mayor Gérald Tremblay worried about the financial impact as Montreal preps for its lucrative Grand Prix race.
Both politicians appealed Friday for “responsibility” on the part of demonstrators, saying protesters should leave Formula One fans alone and not harm stores, hotels and restaurants during the tourist-heavy event next weekend.
Charest accused student groups of “hurting Quebecers” as they take to the streets and expressed concern they would disrupt the Grand Prix, which brings millions of dollars to the province each year.”
Hurting Quebec business is what he should have said. An interesting angle as this story would be where the local chamber of commerce political opinion’s are in terms of support of the demonstrators.
“Tremblay [the mayor of Montreal] told journalists he was “very disappointed, very, very, very disappointed” in the collapse of negotiations between students and the province. With the Grand Prix about to rev up and Montreal’s summer-long series of festivals getting into high gear, the mayor called for a smooth running of a “very important season.”
“I appeal to the maturity and sense of responsibility” of protesters to demonstrate without “causing harm to merchants, hotels and restaurateurs,” Tremblay said.
“I’ll do everything I can to ensure these events are a success, but also to ensure the safety of Montrealers.”
The Mayor’s statement could mean so many things. The doublespeak that has been issuing from the various levels of government has been flowing furiously as of late. I’m guessing that “safety of Montrealers” means more stringent security measures against the demonstrators. I hope Mr.Trembley realized the pardoxical nature of political protest – the tighter you clamp down on people the more people see the injustice of the situation and join in, creating even bigger problems for the forces of law and order. It is happening even now…
“Matthew Larose, a 32-year-old construction foreman, said he’ll probably be going to the big demonstration planned for Saturday afternoon like he has seven of the nighttime marches. He’s against the tuition increases but also against Bill 78.
“If they can do it in Quebec, they can do it everywhere else. It sets a bad precedent for freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of everything. They’re going completely against the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and it’s disgraceful,” he said.”
Bill 78 is a tipping point, hopefully the political class in Montreal will wake up and start helping, rather than harming their cause.
The move is over. Let the unpacking begin. Thank you, my committed readership, for staying with us here at DWR during the transition to our new home. It has been a wild and hectic couple of weeks. I should be able to commit a little more time to blogging and finding the information I find interesting and sharing it with you. With that in mind I’d like to share and and comment on the recent furor about Tom Mulcair’s comments about the “Dutch Disease” in Canada.
The noise generated by his comments are out of proportion to what his observation was:
“Mulcair claims that “Dutch disease” has hit the country, blaming energy exports from the Alberta oilsands for artificially raising the Canadian dollar and hollowing out the manufacturing industry.
Coined in an article in The Economist in 1977, the concept refers to the adverse economic effects that the discovery of large natural gas fields off of the coast of the Netherlands in the 1960s had on the country’s manufacturing sector.
The theory goes that a boom in a natural resource sector can lead to an appreciation of a country’s real exchange rate. That increase in the dollar value makes exports more expensive, and has an adverse effect on the manufacturing sector by making it less competitive.”
Okay, so it sounds reasonable so far. Our dollar goes up and makes our manufacturing industry less competitive. But what has got the defenders of corporatism all up in arms? Mulcair takes his statement one step further…
“Mulcair said the problem is the government is not enforcing legislation that would include the environmental costs of exploiting natural resources.
“Those statistics with regard to the overall losses of jobs in Canada are irrefutable,” he said this week. “And they are directly related to the fact that we’re not enforcing federal [environmental] legislation.”
Oh snap. How dare you mention that pillaging the land in the hog-wild foo-fur-ah that is Fort McMurray might be anything less than a calm nuanced approach to 
resource management is beyond the pale. Fainting couches were needed *stat* across much of the Canadian media and parliament.
“I am wondering when the leader of the Opposition will apologize to western Canadians for suggesting the strength of the western Canadian economy is a disease on Canada,” Heritage Minister James Moore said in the House of Commons.
“He attacks western Canada, he attacks our energy industry, he attacks all of the West and the great work that is being done by western Canadians to contribute to Canada’s national unity. He should be ashamed of himself,” he said.
Yes, he should be ashamed for trying to keep the government accountable to for environmental legislation that is currently on the books, oh the villainy. The tar sands have gained a love-halo that is growing in magnitude. Speaking out against them is sacrosanct,with reasonable debate being drummed out by “it’s good for the economy!!!1!” and other nonsense.
Good On Mulcair for pointing out some of the problems with the oil-sands vis-a-vis the rest of Canada, the man is doing his job as leader of the Opposition.
The burning legion of stupid, led by Harper and his Conservative clown government balefully plods on toward making Canada’s prison system a mirror image of the failed system present in the United States. Do we really need to frack things up Canada-Harper style to get the message that this is a gigantic mistake?
The next election Canadians had better wake up and get this farcical excuse of a governing party out of power.
Can you imagine if we had the sort of hand grenade type budgeting for the social services of Canada? It would be like OH!, nationalized day care??? we thought it was like only 5 billion, but it turned out to be 7 billion, damn I guess that’s just ‘mission creep’. Or, hey we are not going to rely on wisdom from the dark ages and build more prisons but rather, front-load the services that keep people above water and obeying the law instead. OH no, oh no no no.! The only area where we have the flexible budgets and creative accounting seems to be military, and all they seem to do is buy shiny new murder vehicles designed to kill poor coloured people in far away lands.
Woo! Canada F-Yeah!
Our job, fostering democracy and stability in the Middle East, doesn’t come cheap, or even measurable when it comes to budgeting.
“Defence Minister Peter MacKay is defending the government’s accounting of the costs of Canada’s military mission in Libya, following the release of new figures by the Department of National Defence that lay out the final cost of the deployment.
And the total cost of the operation — a figure that includes everything from jet fuel to pilot salaries, including the salaries of military personnel — comes in at $347 million.
Last October, MacKay told CBC Radio’s The House the Libyan mission had cost taxpayers less than $50 million.
“As of Oct. 13, the figures that I’ve received have us well below that, somewhere under $50 million,” MacKay said.
“And that’s the all-up costs of the equipment that we have in the theatre, the transportation to get there, those that have been carrying out this critical mission.”
Well thanks Peter, you missed it only by about 300 million. In the war department, that must be what they call a “slight oversight” or an accounting irregularity. 
“The director of the military’s strategic joint staff was called on to explain duelling figures at a hastily-assembled news conference at National Defence headquarters on Friday afternoon.
Maj.-Gen. Jon Vance said MacKay did not mislead the public and pointed out senior military leaders referenced the figures publicly during Senate committee hearings.
But he concedes the minister would have known the estimated cost at the time and did not speculate on why MacKay chose to go with the lower figures exclusively.”
What? Conservatives lying to the Canadian public? I am completely shocked, especially over war spending and democracy promotion.
“Peter’s got problems with his math yet again and this government’s got problems with trying to figure out how to cost things,” said NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar. “I suppose he just thinks that if he can lowball it, people won’t be concerned about the costs. But, you know, in the end, the costs add up and it caught up to Mr. MacKay.”
The solution is just to get Mackay into the right portfolio. With his math skillz we should be able to rejuvenate the social democratic fabric that makes Canada such a fantastic place to live.
Shut up you pinko bastards. Calling for the twinning of a perfectly fine road that will cost taxpayers millions of dollars. The nanny state can’t take care you and all of your damn problems. It’s a free country if you don’t like driving highway 63 to Fort McMurray then take an alternate route, or drive extra defensively, be responsible for yourself for once.
Now breathe, the above is only a hyperbolic example of the amazing thinking that goes on in liberturdian and conservative minds when it comes to many issues that face society. Replace twinning the road with funding health care, or housing for the poor and you can see how particularly despicable this line of thinking actually is, because it happens all the time. “Oh no”, sayeth our right-wing friends, “It isn’t like that at all, we just want smaller government and more freedom to pursue profits, we certainly do not want people dying on our account.”
Bullshite. Actually you do. The aptly named ‘Highway of Death‘ has been a concern for years and private industry has done nothing to alleviate the situation. Twinning the highways is strictly an externality for them, or the government’s problem. Certainly not a project worth the change on the bottom line of the ledger. One common tawdry verse I here from the right is how responsive private industry is to the ever changing needs of people and the market… what they don’t add is “as long as it profitable” to their sage pronouncements. Clearly, worker safety is of little concern to the oil companies otherwise the highway would been completed a long time ago.
The people of Alberta should be represented by the government, their interests should be protected first over the interests of private industry. Denying the government the money it needs to protect the people of Alberta is criminal. If we had anything even resembling reasonable royalty rates, Highway 63 would have been twinned years ago, heck we probably could have rail service by now. But, we here in Alberta seem to think that the freedom to plunder and profit comes ahead of the freedom to live safely and securely(most firmly in Southern Alberta where they heartily endorse the Wild Fascist Rose Party).
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…