You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Barbara Ehrenreich’ tag.
Tag Archive
The DWR Quote of the Day – For Her Own Good — Barbara Ehrenreich & Deirdre English
March 11, 2017 in Feminism, History | Tags: Barbara Ehrenreich, Deirdre English, Medical Science, Patriarchy, The DWR Feminist Quote of the Day | by The Arbourist | 2 comments
“In the second half of the century, these fumbling experiments with the female interior gave way to the more decisive technique of surgery—aimed increasingly at the control of female personality disorders. There had been a brief fad of clitoridectomy (removal of the clitoris) in the eighteen sixties, following the introduction of the operation by the English physician Isaac Baker Brown. Although most doctors frowned on the practice of removing the clitoris, they tended to agree that it might be necessary in cases of nymphomania, intractable masturbation, or “unnatural growth” of that organ. (The last clitoridectomy we know of in the United States was performed in 1948 on a child of five, as a cure for masturbation.)The most common form of surgical intervention in the female personality was ovariotomy, removal of the ovaries—or “female castration.” In 1906 a leading gynecological surgeon estimated that there were 150,000 women in the United States who had lost their ovaries under the knife. Some doctors boasted that they had removed from fifteen hundred to two thousand ovaries apiece. According to historian G. J. Barker-Benfield: “Among the indications were troublesomeness, eating like a ploughman, masturbation, attempted suicide, erotic tendencies, persecution mania, simple ‘cussedness,’ and dysmenorrhea [painful menstruation]. Most apparent in the enormous variety of symptoms doctors took to indicate castration was a strong current of sexual appetitiveness on the part of women.” The rationale for the operation flowed directly from the theory of the “psychology of the ovary”: since the ovaries controlled the personality, they must be responsible for any psychological disorders: conversely, psychological disorders were a sure sign of ovarian disease. Ergo, the organs must be removed…
The overwhelming majority of women who had leeches or hot steel applied to their cervices, or who had their clitorises or ovaries removed, were women of the middle to upper classes, for after all, these procedures cost money. But it should not be imagined that poor women were spared the gynecologist’s exotic catalog of tortures simply because they couldn’t pay. The pioneering work in gynecological surgery had been performed by Marion Sims on black female slaves he kept for the sole purpose of surgical experimentation. He operated on one of them thirty times in four years, being foiled over and over by post-operative infections. After moving to New York, Sims continued his experimentation on indigent Irish women in the wards of the New York Women’s Hospital. So, though middle-class women suffered most from the doctors’ actual practice, it was poor and black women who had suffered through the brutal period of experimentation.
— Barbara Ehrenreich & Deirdre English
Found on ‘a reading blog‘.
Share this:
The DWR Sunday Disservice – The Ideology, or Cult of Happiness
August 18, 2013 in Politics, Social Science | Tags: Barbara Ehrenreich, Postive Psychology (Aka Bullshite), Systems of Control, The DWR Sunday Disservice, The Power of Positive Thinking | by The Arbourist | 1 comment
Today, let’s look at one of the prime methods of baffling the masses. The power of positive thinking and the credulous ‘Positive Psychology’ that buttresses the fatuous assertions made by the followers of the cult of happiness. While not a exclusively in the domain in religious, the deluded (religious and otherwise) use ‘positive thinking’ to lie to their flocks and ensconce the cancerous idea that somehow if they just work a little harder and be a little happier wealth, fame and fortune will fall into their laps.
This of course, is bullshit.
Your earning potential in life is determined by a host of factors including where you where born, what your parents do, and their socioeconomic status. All of these factors have exactly nothing to do with your attitude or work ethic, but figure prominently on the general trajectory your life will follow. I hypothesize that this is why the cult of Happiness is so pervasive in the US is because it rides shotgun to the other great American Myth that with enough individual hard work you can “make it”.
Both mythologies are meant to distract people from the well worn paradigm of the wealthy plundering society exclusively for their benefit. Real societal change – that brought on by mass social movements – is carefully guarded against. While working at non unionized Wal Mart, being paid less than a living wage and living off of food stamps (that would be the American government subsidizing Walmart btw. Socialism!!1!1!!!), if you just work a little harder and be a little more positive you’ll prosper. Fixing the systematic problems in society is the furthest idea from your mind as you just manage to scrape by, from day to day. If the endemic poverty doesn’t silence you, the self-blame and shame will.
The converse is where the truly toxic shit kicks in, if you are somehow(?) not prosperous the problem must be all in *you*. Not the society around you, not the cultural norms, not the fucking status quo that mandates working poverty for so many Americans – no no no – the problem must be with the individuated, atomized, you.
This is fucking brilliant social engineering, no? Keeping the common people blaming themselves as opposed to organizing and effecting social change, all the while your class continues to ravage the countries wealth and resources.
Barbra Ehrenreich talks about this phenomena in her book Bright Sided and in the talk that follows starts her explanation of the cult of happiness via her own experiences with breast cancer. Further into the talk she describes the effects in the workplace and society as a whole. The book and the talk are well worth your time, faithful readers. I’ve excerpted the review from the book and the talk from a Harvard Book Store .Enjoy.
Ehrenreich’s quarrel is not with feeling upbeat but rather with the “inescapable pseudoscientific flapdoodle” of life coaches and self-improvement products claiming that
thinking positively will result in wealth, success and other joyful outcomes. Such magical thinking has become a means of social control in the workplace—where uncheerful employees are ostracized—and prevents action to achieve social change. With life coaches, business motivators and evangelical preachers promoting delusional expectations—“God has a plan” for those who have lost jobs and homes in the current economic crisis, says Christian preacher Joel Osteen—positive thinking can claim partial credit for a major role in such recent disastrous events as the Iraq war and the financial meltdown.
Ehrenreich’s many interviews include meetings with psychologist Martin Seligman, whose “positive psychology,” she finds, offers little credible evidence to make it any different from the wishing-will-make-it-so thinking of writers from Dale Carnegie (How to Win Friends & Influence People) to Rhonda Byrne (The Secret). The author’s tough-minded and convincing broadside raises troubling questions about many aspects of contemporary American life, and she provides an antidote to the pervasive culture of cheerfulness—reality-based critical thinking that will encourage people to alter social arrangements in ways that improve their lives.
Positive thinking summarized:
“[…] the new science of positive psychology is founded on a whole series of fallacious arguments; these involve circular reasoning, tautology, failure to clearly define or properly apply terms, the identification of causal relations where none exist, and unjustified generalisation. Instead of demonstrating that positive attitudes explain achievement, success, well-being and happiness, positive psychology merely associates mental health with a particular personality type: a cheerful, outgoing, goal-driven, status-seeking extravert.”
Share this:
Barbara Ehrenreich – Smile or Die with RSA enhancement.
August 27, 2010 in Education | Tags: Barbara Ehrenreich, Market Fundamentalism, RSA, Smile or Die, The Power of Positive Thinking | by The Arbourist | Comments closed
Two RSA vids in the same week? Sue me, I’m prepping to go back to school and the grind associated with not being on summer holidays. :)
Ms.Ehrenreich gives a short but concise talk about the ills of Positive Thinking. I particularly like near the end in which she brings the idea that positive thinking is really just a corollary of market fundamentalism and the myths established around that particularly mortiferous ideal.




Your opinions…