You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Greed’ tag.
It is nice to see a little sanctimony coming from the other side of the political spectrum once and awhile. Bill Maher fills that role admirably.
The Internet has growing pains right now. The whinging from the corporations is effecting recent government policy decisions about what and how things are downloaded on the net.
“Hollywood studios, recording labels, artists and internet service providers have created a program to alert internet subscribers when their accounts are used to access movies, songs and other content that entertainment companies consider unauthorized.
The new “copyright alerts” system is intended to educate consumers about online piracy by sending up to six electronic messages notifying subscribers when their accounts are used to download or share such content. Internet service providers in the U.S. would send the alerts to a subscriber after receiving a notice from a copyright holder.”
You see friends, money is being made on the Net, but not enough…never will it be enough. Presently commercial greed is in the drivers seat, so hang on tight for awhile, it is going to get bumpy.
“Consumers who ignore the notices could face “mitigation measures,” such as slower Internet connections or redirection to a special website that provides information about copyright protections. Internet service providers would not be required to terminate any subscriber accounts or hand over subscriber names to copyright holders.”
You feel that? That was your activity online being monitored to even a greater extent than what it is now. Let’s take a peek at who is organizing this little shindig.
“Among the groups and companies participating in the new program: the Motion Picture Association of America and member companies including Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures and Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; the Recording Industry Association of America and member companies including Universal Music Group Recordings and Warner Music Group; Independent Film & Television Alliance; and internet services providers including AT&T Inc., Comcast Corp. and Verizon Communications Inc.”
Yep. The usual suspects, righteously protecting their products the world wide. One commenter on the article describes my attitude toward these new measures perfectly…
“This seems like a good incentive to develop some hardcore personal encryption software.
I’m paying them to transmit my bits and bytes, not to look at them. This is a principle I do not plan to simply roll over and abandon.”
The amount of fraternization between the Alberta Government and the Oil Industry always makes decisions such as these seem questionable. The idea behind this three million dollar fine is more of a public relations ploy than anything
Making moonscapes here on Earth in the name or resource extraction.
else. Consider that Government gets to look good for ‘protecting the environment’ and the company also gets to be thoroughly ‘punished’ for its environmental indiscretions. Everyone wins! Well except for the wildlife, the Athabasca river, the people dying of cancer because of the emissions from the tar sands the atmosphere… Well, the right people are winning gosh darn it!
“Oilsands giant Syncrude Canada will pay a $3-million penalty for the deaths of 1,600 ducks in one of its toxic tailings ponds in April 2008.
Syncrude lawyers and federal and provincial prosecutors presented the deal Friday morning in provincial court in St. Albert, Alta., and Judge Ken Tjosvold accepted it.”
Woo, the cordial relations between Alberta Government and the oil industry. See, they can work together!
“Alberta Energy Minister Ron Liepert wouldn’t comment specifically on the court decision but said it sends a message to industry that the province will take action if environmental policies are breached.
“This whole process … shows that if there is a breach of an environmental regulation or legislation, that we are prepared to take action,” he said. “We did and the process unfolded and this is the culmination of it.”
In Vancouver, federal Environment Minister Jim Prentice said the fine was the largest in Canadian history for an environmental offence.
“I think this shows that we have strong environmental laws in Canada and that we will enforce them,” Prentice said.”
One would think that strong environmental laws would have stopped the creation of huge tailings ponds in the first
The cost of doing business.
place. Again though, in the acceptable discourse, companies are ‘learning lessons’ and governments are ‘protecting the environment’.
CBC should be commended though as they did find room in their article to mention another point of view.
“A $3-million fine to a multi-billion dollar company equates to a slap on the wrist,” he [Mike Hudema of Greenpeace] said.
“This doesn’t send a very strong message to the industry that Alberta or the federal government is really serious about enforcing our legislation or that crimes like this can’t happen in the future.”
Exactly. What this amounts to is a non-fine for non-important issue. The correct notes have been played, the conductor has gesticulated in the appropriate way for the appeasement of the crowd. The hall goes dark, and it is business as usual here in Alberta.
Wonder why things are generally going as they are? Start here.
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…