You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Internet’ tag.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a marvel of modern computing, designed to mimic human thinking by learning from vast troves of information. At its heart lie systems like Large Language Models (LLMs), powerful programs trained to understand and generate human language—think of them as digital librarians, sifting through patterns in text to answer questions or write stories. These models rely on data collected from the internet, a process called web scraping, where public texts like articles or forums are gathered to fuel their learning. AI’s strength lies in this ability to absorb and process information at scale, but its outputs—however impressive—depend entirely on the quality of that data. A flawed foundation can lead to errors or biases, a challenge that demands vigilance.
Creating an AI model is like forging a tool from raw ore: it requires immense effort and precision. Developers collect billions of words through scraping, carefully filtering out irrelevant or harmful content to build a reliable dataset. This data trains the model to predict word patterns, refining its ability to respond sensibly—an arduous process powered by thousands of computers working for months. Yet, the stakes are high: if the scraped data reflects societal prejudices or lacks diversity, the AI may produce skewed or misleading results. Ethical data collection is thus no afterthought—it shapes whether AI unites us through shared understanding or deepens existing divides.
Once built, AI models serve practical purposes, from powering chatbots to summarizing texts, but they are not infallible. They excel at recognizing patterns but struggle with abstract reasoning or unfamiliar scenarios, sometimes generating convincing but false information, known as “hallucinations.” Ethical concerns persist: scraping raises questions about privacy and ownership, as texts—creative works, personal posts—are used without clear consent. AI holds transformative potential, a beacon for collective progress. Yet, without careful stewardship, it risks eroding trust. Responsible innovation—grounded in transparency and fairness—ensures AI serves humanity, not sows discord.
Did You Want to Know More?
For deeper insights into AI and LLMs, explore these resources:
- What Is Artificial Intelligence? – IBM’s overview of AI fundamentals, including its history and applications.
- How Large Language Models Work – NVIDIA’s explanation of LLMs, covering their architecture and training process.
- Web Scraping and AI Ethics – Wired’s analysis of web scraping’s role in AI and its ethical challenges.
:)
The fight to maintain Net Neutrality has been raging. You have not heard about it because it is not in the big companies interests for you to know about it. Think it isn’t a big deal? Please partake in the observed behaviour of said companies and remind yourself that these infractions happened during the time when the regulations were still in full force with the FCC enforcing the rules.
The best predictor of future outcomes is past behaviour… Stop this shit. Canada is waffling at the moment, but it is better than the free for all that will going down in the US. If you happen to be a US citizen spend some time filling out a form and/or making a call to your congress critter here.
I’m not sure what exactly goes on in the American psyche when it comes to regulations that make the shit-kettle we know as life better for everyone. Romanticizing the ‘good ole days’ is pretty much just bug-fuck crazy, unless you enjoy eating tainted meat, breathing polluted air, and having the female half of the population as sex slaves. Regulation is necessary in a democratic society, libertarian fap-happy wet dreams aside.
How I experience the internet is vastly different depending on whether I am at work, or at home. At work, wherever I go, I experience pop-ups, obtrusive ads, and auto-play movies/noise. Let me assure you, that while teaching, having all the distracting advertising going on in the background does not help the learning experience. But meanwhile, at home I can browse the web unencumbered by any of the annoyances listed above. Pages load quickly and are appealing to read with little clutter to distract the eye and the mind. This peaceful repose is achieved primarily through the use of two program plugins that are available to the Firefox browser – Ad Block Plus and Ghostery. Ad block screens out most of the ads and Ghostery stops websites from tracking your movements and preferences as you browse on the internet (oh, and duck duck go is a nice start to increase your privacy while browsing as well). The powers that be though, are not amused by individuals taking control of their internet experience.
“Global ad spending is expected to reach $600 billion US by the end of next year, according to eMarketer, and grow at an annual rate of about five per cent until the end of the decade. Much of that growth is being fuelled by digital advertising, particularly on mobile devices.
But there was one session in Cannes where some very dark clouds managed to intrude on the sunny forecast. It was a panel devoted to the current scourge of the digital advertising industry — ad blocking.
According to a report by PageFair and Adobe, more than 200 million people worldwide have downloaded software that can block virtually all online advertising.
The number of people blocking ads increased by more than 40 per cent last year, and it is estimated that blocking cost cash-starved publishers more than $22 billion last year.”
Oh my goodness. People not wanting advertising to be part of every facet of their life, not a choice, but a scourge.
“Almost everyone in the ad industry acknowledges that most of the wounds that have led to the rise in ad blocking are self-inflicted.
Advertisers got greedy by assaulting users with too many low quality, untargeted ads, too many auto play videos, too much click bait.
Last fall, the IAB launched an initiative called L.E.A.N. Ads (light, encrypted, ad choice supported, non-invasive).
The IAB hopes that by following the L.E.A.N. guidelines, advertisers will create ads that consumers will be happy to see.”
Hmm, so we alienate people to the point where ad blocking is necessary to have a good browsing experience and then complain that ad-blocking is ‘killing’ the internet. Other entities have decided that they won’t let the user in, if ad-blocking is enabled.
“Sites like Forbes and GQ won’t allow access to their content unless users turn them off. At Cannes, Mark Thompson, the president and CEO of the New York Times, announced that his newspaper would soon be offering an ad-free edition to subscribers at a premium price.
Other publishers are appealing to their readers’ sense of fairness and justice, asking them to turn off their blockers and reminding them they are a critical part of the ecosystem that has powered the internet for the past 20 years. Without ads, there would be no free content online.”
Well, GQ and Forbes you can go frack yourself sideways as the content you produce will be reproduced elsewhere on the web without your restrictions. :) The counterpoint to this though is the insidious beast known as ‘native advertising’.
“So-called “native advertising” has been growing in popularity over the past several years. Also known as “sponsored content,” it looks and feels like editorial content, but it comes from advertisers rather than journalists.
Native advertisements can often pass through ad blocking filters because the filters don’t recognize it as advertising. Many readers seem to prefer this kind of content over traditional advertising, provided it’s properly labelled, although there’s no consensus on what constitutes proper labelling.”
Watch your daily paper, there is more this native advertising junk in there everyday. If there is a scourge to be named, it should be that of the advertising editorial or advertorial.
“But the real victims of the ad blocking surge may not be advertisers and publishers, but the “free” web itself.
The money to pay for content has to come from somewhere, and if you take advertising revenue out of the equation, readers will have to pick up the slack themselves, something they have historically been reluctant to do. Without ads, the web may be a poorer and less interesting place.”
Breaking news: The sky is indeed falling. Also: A-Booga-Booga-Booga! The heart of the very internet itself will crumble if ad-blocking continues!
The advertising industry may piss-off right the frack off with their hyperbole; starting yesterday. If the amount of stultifying drek available on the interweebs is halved tomorrow, not a soul would notice. So I say bring on the next internet apocalypse.
Break out of your browser bubble. I suggest you use duckduckgo as your web browser as they claim it is more private and bubble free browsing experience.
(ed. *update* – added new Mahr video.)
Huh, as I was browsing the weeb, I ‘happened’ to find this video featuring Bill Mahr on the very same subject.
The Internet has growing pains right now. The whinging from the corporations is effecting recent government policy decisions about what and how things are downloaded on the net.
“Hollywood studios, recording labels, artists and internet service providers have created a program to alert internet subscribers when their accounts are used to access movies, songs and other content that entertainment companies consider unauthorized.
The new “copyright alerts” system is intended to educate consumers about online piracy by sending up to six electronic messages notifying subscribers when their accounts are used to download or share such content. Internet service providers in the U.S. would send the alerts to a subscriber after receiving a notice from a copyright holder.”
You see friends, money is being made on the Net, but not enough…never will it be enough. Presently commercial greed is in the drivers seat, so hang on tight for awhile, it is going to get bumpy.
“Consumers who ignore the notices could face “mitigation measures,” such as slower Internet connections or redirection to a special website that provides information about copyright protections. Internet service providers would not be required to terminate any subscriber accounts or hand over subscriber names to copyright holders.”
You feel that? That was your activity online being monitored to even a greater extent than what it is now. Let’s take a peek at who is organizing this little shindig.
“Among the groups and companies participating in the new program: the Motion Picture Association of America and member companies including Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures and Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc.; the Recording Industry Association of America and member companies including Universal Music Group Recordings and Warner Music Group; Independent Film & Television Alliance; and internet services providers including AT&T Inc., Comcast Corp. and Verizon Communications Inc.”
Yep. The usual suspects, righteously protecting their products the world wide. One commenter on the article describes my attitude toward these new measures perfectly…
“This seems like a good incentive to develop some hardcore personal encryption software.
I’m paying them to transmit my bits and bytes, not to look at them. This is a principle I do not plan to simply roll over and abandon.”
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…