The Conservative government of Canada once again proves that it is anti-choice, anti-rational and anti-woman. The CBC said:
“A Liberal motion to include a broader range of family planning programs, including contraception, in a maternal health initiative for developing countries, was defeated 144-138 in the House of Commons Tuesday.”
A Liberal motion in the house of commons that was based on fact and evidence in the field was voted down.
“The motion tabled by Liberal foreign affairs critic Bob Rae said Canada’s maternal health proposal to G8 nations must be based on “scientific evidence, which proves that education and family planning can prevent as many as one in every three maternal deaths” and refrain from the “failed right-wing ideologies” of former U.S. president George W. Bush.”
Shocking as it may seem to the CPC, access to reproductive services saves lives.
“Earlier in the day, Rae said the government has refused to acknowledge scientific evidence that shows reducing deaths of women during childbirth in developing countries is inextricably linked to the availability of family planning”
So rather than own up to their anti-woman, anti-science platform the Conservatives decide this is an attempt to reopen the abortion debate? How the frack does this make sense? The question of Abortion in Canada has been settled legally (Access to facilities though is another story). Women have the legal right to access abortions and other health services when they deem fit. Nothing to debate. What minister Oda says is just a sad attempt to cover the Canadian government’s twisted socially conservative roots.
“Oda described the Liberal motion as a “transparent attempt to reopen the abortion debate that we have clearly said we have no intention to getting into.”
She insisted the government understands the urgency of ensuring that women can have a safe, healthy pregnancy, and she cited statistics suggesting that as many as 80 per cent of deaths during childbirth are easily preventable by providing basic needs such as clean water and access to trained health-care workers.”
Just be open with us Bev, the freedoms Canadian women have should not apply to women of other countries, after-all it is God given right for a woman to die in childbirth.






5 comments
March 24, 2010 at 10:18 am
The Intransigent One
Why is this so hard to understand: if a fertile woman is in a relationship with a fertile man, in which the man regularly ejaculates in her vagina, then, in the absence of some kind of contraception, she has something like an 85% chance of getting pregnant in a year. The alternative to family planning is getting pregnant every time you stop breastfeeding (and sometimes sooner), over and over again, from the age you start fucking until either menopause, or until repeated pregnancies finally takes its toll on your body and kills you.
LikeLike
March 24, 2010 at 10:45 am
The Arbourist
You make it sound like status quo is unacceptable or something. :/
*sigh*
LikeLike
April 29, 2010 at 12:04 am
nktrygg
Technically, the issue of abortion isn’t legally settled – the laws on abortion were struck down and any politician who tried to make it a plank guaranteed they couldn’t be elected.
Abortion became regulated as a medical procedure.
What people are forgetting the the MP Bev Oda who’s at the centre of this debacle of inequality – was also the Minister of the Status of Women at the time equality was removed from it’s mandate a few years back.
Harper ignores reality in many respects – lack of reproductive control is linked to poverty as well as infant and mother mortality rates.
much like the so called war on drugs has only cost us huge money and increased drug use
denying abortion will just ensure more poverty and death
nina
LikeLike
May 2, 2010 at 11:25 pm
The Arbourist
It is important to keep the focus on what the issue actually is; Female access to reproductive services. It is a key factor in regards to women’s rights and autonomy. This particular government seems to deny that women are people and have self ownership over their bodies. It is quite discouraging at times.
LikeLike
May 5, 2010 at 10:45 pm
nktrygg
I absolutely agree, Arbourist.
abortion is not at all about “babies” it’s about who gets to control women.
their ability to have reproductive control and to choose to have sex
because that’s what it comes down to.
the alleged pro-lifers do not care about the already born people – the only life they concern themselves with is from conception to birth.
it’s not sanctity of life, it’s the sanctimoniousness of their opinion that matters.
LikeLike