I quote from the latest news update released by the Guttmacher Institute.
“One-third of U.S. pregnancies occur within 18 months of a previous birth, according to “Short Interpregnancy Intervals in the United States,” by Laura Lindberg of the Guttmacher Institute et al., while 50% occurred within 18–59 months, and 16% occurred at 60 or more months. Short birth spacing, which was measured as 18 months or less, was found to be strongly linked to unintended pregnancies, and being between 15 and 19 years old at the time of conception.
Previous research has shown that short spacing between pregnancies can lead to harmful outcomes for mothers, such as preeclampsia, and for newborns, such as being born preterm or with low birth weight. Additionally, the federal Healthy People 2020 initiative aims to reduce by 10% the number of pregnancies that occur within 18 months of a previous birth. Lindberg explains that preventing this short spacing is thus a public health priority in the United States, and estimates that reducing unintended pregnancies could reduce shortly spaced births from 35% to 23%, a feat that would benefit the health of both the mother and the newborn.
“Pregnancy intervals of more than 18 months are considered optimal birth spacing, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and others,” said Lindberg. “Helping women plan and space their pregnancies through greater contraceptive access can lead to better outcomes for both mother and infant.” The researchers identify long-acting reversible contraceptives, such as IUDs, as particularly well-suited to increasing the space between pregnancies.”
Look what happens when science and social science intersect. Better outcomes for women and children – why? Because women can choose when and when not be pregnant. This is what the point so many forced birth advocates miss – the person who is pregnant knows what is best for her and her family and, given proper access to reproductive services, can plan for the best possible conditions for herself and her children.
Contrast this with the christian business uproar over providing contraceptives for sluts! women and how tragically unfair it is to their jebus-based-bullshite.
Religion continues to poison everything it touches, but we already knew that.





12 comments
June 10, 2013 at 6:59 am
violetwisp
Oh, I don’t know. Since Eve took a bite of that apple, our only path to redemption is through childbirth. We really need to squeeze as many out as possible while we’re fertile.
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 7:45 am
john zande
I was reading your comments on Neilsen’s blog last night. Damn, Arb, you are good at this stuff. It drives me nuts but you seem to be able to outmaneuver them all. Impressed, i am.
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 9:41 am
The Arbourist
@VW
Don’t forget cooking and housekeeping, also keys to female redemption…
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 10:43 am
syrbal
My close birth spacing was based on a whole ‘nother sort of “religion”….the Almighty Doctor who told me if I didn’t have kids young, I’d never have them at all. So after my first child at 24, I intentionally got pregnant again when my first born was 6 months old. My final child was born at age 30 — a month shy of my 31st birthday. Had we not believed the doctor, my second child would not have been carried in the middle of an exhausting year with an infant with a influenza bout at mid-term, resulting in a child with bi-polar disorder with psychotic tendencies.
Unfortunately, religion isn’t the ONLY poison out there….but it feeds some of the others, like patriarchally tinged science and medicine.
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 3:19 pm
cocacolafiend
This is a very interesting post. I never realized pregnancies that were closer than 18 months apart caused such problems.
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 6:53 pm
Mera
Neilsen’s blog?
Linky?
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 7:18 pm
The Arbourist
Neilsen’s blog can be found here. :)
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 7:40 pm
Mera
Thanks
You might also find this link to be worthwhile:
http://discovermagazine.com/2004/may/cover
Life begins before ovulation
Successful fertilization is meaningless, if the embryo is doomed from the start
LikeLike
June 10, 2013 at 7:46 pm
Mera
This is also awesome:
http://www.abortionreview.org/index.php/site/article/864/
And from the essays I posted last week:
http://www.sullydog.com/sullysites/qm/classicmeat/10-01.htm
LikeLike
June 11, 2013 at 11:22 am
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
My Mother has similar issues with the medical profession, not pregnancy related, but rather the mansplainy-authoritative BS. It has gotten a little better over the years but, as of yet, is far from perfect.
LikeLike
June 11, 2013 at 11:24 am
syrbal
Yeah, those mansplaining doctors. It particularly irritates me when it comes out of the mouth of a woman doctor! If we call not-progressive Democrats “bluedogs”…what do we call a woman who has jumped ship to the domineering side?
LikeLike
June 12, 2013 at 9:40 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
I took too much of my undergrad in philosophy – it kinda warps your brain in a particular way. Believe you me John, it drives me nuts as well. Especially that people will go to such lengths to deprive women of their rights and somehow cast this slavery as a “moral choice”. It is a burr in my saddle blanket that makes me not roll my eyes and pass it along as the usual misogyny that infests our society, but rather an active attack on women being regarded as people.
That whole women as broodmares meme is atrocious and must be refuted at every turn.
LikeLike