I thought I’d share some useful advice about relationships and marriage. It will be familiar reading to those who have taken sociology of the family. Enjoy.
“John Gottman’s FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE
John Gottman, Ph.D., is a well respected psychologist and marriage researcher who reports that an unhappy marriage can increase your chances of becoming ill by 35% and take four years off your life! He believes “working on your marriage every day will do more for your health and longevity than working out at a health club”. Although many of us believe that anger is the root cause of unhappy relationships, Gottman notes that it is not conflict itself that is the problem, but
how we handle it. Venting anger constructively can actually do wonders to clear the air and get a relationship back in balance. However, conflict does become a problem when it is characterized by the presence of what Gottman calls the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse” : criticism,contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling.
1. CriticismCriticism involves attacking your partner’s personality or character, rather than focusing on the specific behavior that bothers you. It is healthy to air disagreements, but not to attack your spouse’s personality or character in the process. This is the difference between saying, “I’m upset that you didn’t take out the trash” and saying, “I can’t believe you didn’t take out the trash. You’re just so irresponsible.” In general, women are more likely to pull this horseman into conflict.
***
2. Contempt.
Contempt is one step up from criticism and involves tearing down or being insulting toward your partner. Contempt is an open sign of disrespect. Examples of contempt include: putting down your spouse, rolling your eyes or sneering, or tearing down the other person with so – called “humor.”***
3. Defensiveness.
Adopting a defensive stance in the middle of conflict may be a natural response, but does not help the relationship. When a person is defensive, he or she often experiences a great deal of tension and has difficulty tuning into what is being said. Denying responsibility, making excuses, or meeting one complaint with another are all examples of defensiveness.***
4. Stonewalling.
People who stonewall simply refuse to respond. Occasional stonewalling can be healthy, but as a typical way of interacting, stonewalling during conflict can be destructive to the marriage. When you stonewall on a regular basis, you are pulling yourself out of the marriage, rather than working out your problems. Men tend to engage in stonewalling much more often than women do.***
All couples will engage in these types of behaviors at some point in their marriage, but when the four horsemen take permanent residence, the relationship has a high likelihood of failing. In fact, Gottman’s research reveals that the chronic presence of these four factors in a relationship can be used to predict, with over 80% accuracy, which couples will eventually divorce. When attempts to repair the damage done by these horsemen are met with repeated rejection, Gottman says there is over a 90% chance the relationship will end in divorce.***
If your relationship is filled with these four issues, take notice, change yourself, work together, make improvements. Don’t delay!
As Gottman has made clear, with work and an investment in overcoming these challenges marriage can improve and become successful. If left unattended divorce is often inevitable.”
Excerpted from an article, “Marriage and Healthy” by Poonam Sharma, Ph.D.;
further information and research can be found in Dr. John Gottman’s book, “The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work”
Apologies for the crappy formatting, as this was from a .pdf and they suck when put into raw form.
*Update* – Video of Gottman speaking about the Four Horsemen.
10 comments
December 4, 2013 at 6:24 am
john zande
Should be made into posters and handed out to couples on their wedding day.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 7:09 am
bodycrimes
People showing contempt for one another is one I don’t get. It’s so toxic. The others are difficult – criticism is part of a relationship, but it’s so hard to do without emotion or hurt being the result for either party. Defensiveness is the other side of criticism.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 10:00 am
VR Kaine
Love Gottman’s work – thanks for posting!
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 10:12 am
syrbal-labrys
I was once guilty of #1, and my husband was a chronic #4 — which ignited my #1, lol. He was not trying to be an ass, it was his chronic PTSD that sent him to silent/flight mode; MY ptsd kept me in chronic fight mode — a spectacularly bad combination. But there was some deep basic respect and humanity in both of us that enabled us to hold on and move beyond it, as we both now work to slay the real ‘dragons’ in our lives.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 11:50 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
Agreed.
I read this first in a Human Ecology Class on intimate relationships. As I read more deeply in the topic I realized where I could do a better job of communicating my thoughts to the Intransigent One.
I was, unknowingly(ish) using #3 Defensiveness to short circuit many of the important conversations that we were trying to have. It was handy because you could just avoid talking about sensitive topics.
The overall lesson I learned about myself and relationships was that communication is key to making them work. We as a species would like to think that we do a good job in speaking our mind. We do not, as the science explicitly says, thus much effort must be taken to ensure we are communicating effectively.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 11:54 am
The Arbourist
@BC
It is symptomatic of lack of communication between the two parties. It is the tell-tale of an unresolved conflict.
Criticism, and defensiveness happen and what Gottman proposes is that when these become the way people communicate the majority of the time do these features become problematic.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 11:55 am
The Arbourist
@Vern
Well you are welcome. I didn’t realize sociology was also part of your repertoire. :)
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 11:56 am
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
I’m glad you’ve overcome some of the unhealthy habits that make communication so darn difficult. In marriage, it would seem that the only way forward is together.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 12:01 pm
syrbal-labrys
Indeed…it is that or divorce. And I am one of the seemingly rare birds that sees divorce as rather casually catastrophic and believe if drugs, abuse, or alcohol are not involved in a “bad” marriage, the best course is to soldier onward together to fix it.
Looking back? I know I was critical, but not nearly so critical as he perceived — he chronically projected his abusive critical mother upon me. In a way, email and texting helped save us….in PRINT he couldn’t so easily hear things I did NOT say.
LikeLike
December 4, 2013 at 12:09 pm
VR Kaine
Yup. I don’t go all super-deep academic into it but I do counsel execs on corporate culture plus I also help them get their home life in better shape since that correlates to the type of culture they create and maintain in the workplace. I find that the “Four Horsemen”apply to coworker/departmental relationships even if it’s not to the same degree as intimate partnerships.
LikeLike