The “Sucker Punch Remix” of Björk‘s “Army of Me” is based upon a trip hop production and “repeatedly pummels via the psychedelic vocal delivery and careening, crushing guitars”.
Did you need to darkly-dangerously rock out? This, gentle readers, is your tune.




15 comments
March 4, 2016 at 6:07 am
violetwisp
Nice piece of music, never heard that remix. Given our discussions on harmful gender roles I’m surprised you choose to splat these images on your site. It’s typical of male-made films claiming to empower women while presenting them as nothing but (frighteningly young) sex objects to be ogled. I watched the first 10 minutes of that film and was sufficiently repulsed by the whole thing to give up. A quick read tells me that the objectification gets ramped up through the film and that in every scenario a man is required to ‘save’ the characters. It must give you a great sense of moral superiority to slam trans women for choosing to express themselves as they feel comfortable, while glorifying the very worst of stereotyped female attractiveness and sexual objectification to cool beats. :D
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 8:11 am
john zande
I like. I also liked Sucker Punch and was a little confused why it wasn’t bigger than it was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 8:12 am
john zande
@Violet
Really, you didn’t like it? I thought it was pretty well done.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 10:41 am
The Arbourist
@VW
The women presented in the video were empowered individuals making choices. You shouldn’t try to impose your moral lens on these individuals, as it hurts their autonomy. Nothing can be gleaned from discussing what individuals do, because after all it, must be good for society if said individuals are making choices. Discussing whether the choices available to them are *good* within the context of greater society is clearly a waste of time, therefore the focus must remain strictly on the individual and their feelings, because they are the singular metrics we should use to evaluate society.
But the gender codification of roles in society don’t always apply, individuals can choose to transgress them. Acting up the expected standards of society can actually subvert the gendered role in question.
Clearly in this video we have people subverting their gender roles, they are kicking ass and taking names, just like men would do. How could we possibly know they were women without gender specific clothing, and really it is very possible they chose what their clothes are, and who are we to analyses their choices?
Sounds like you have it out for these women, maybe you should back off and think about how harmful your criticisms are, and the damage done by merely discussing the topic.
Making individual choices, the key to liberal empowerment, is what is important to remember – if the choices reinforce the socially accepted status-quo, then they must be good because the individual is empowered. The problem then must be the with the class analysis, and probably patriarchy too – as those concepts when dealing with the individual must be flawed.
Obviously, because of the choices being made by these females, they are not being objectified, because individuals making choices overrules what society has to say – and it seems like you are being awfully prescriptive about how these women should live their lives and express themselves. I think it may be a problem with you looking through your particular lens on society again. I don’t think that its right that you go after these people who are just trying to express themselves just for the choices that they make, that is pretty hurtful to the individuals I must say.
/lib fem off/
—–
Actually for the mix I wanted, this was among the better choices, such as they were – the other choice was a lot of staring at Catwoman’s cartoon butt. :/ Also not so good.
All of the choices for this particular mix were bad. It makes for an interesting parallel.
So really, the clip choices are kinda like the ones that are presented to women: the quintessential patriarchal shit sandwich.
Accept the roles you’re given maybe get a cookie and some better treatment in return – or refuse the bullshit on principle and then have to fight with everyone over just about everything in an attempt to define who you are and your basic humanity.
Oh, and I do agree with you VW ,the movie is shite. :) The things one must do to rock some phat beats.
LikeLike
March 4, 2016 at 10:45 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
You liked Sucker Punch? :) The heat in Brazil must be something fierce. :)
It could have been a awesome movie, as the set pieces where pretty awesome, but the characterization of women -wank material for 15yr olds – leaves much to be desired.
LikeLike
March 4, 2016 at 10:48 am
john zande
Well, I liked the art of it. Much like 300. Visually excellent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 10:58 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
The 300? Oh dear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 11:14 am
john zande
Oh bugger off! :) That was a moving canvas :) :) :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 4, 2016 at 11:16 am
The Arbourist
@JZ
I have to have some fun once and awhile JZ. :) I can’t *always* be the humourless feminist killjoy.
LikeLike
March 4, 2016 at 11:17 am
john zande
LOL
LikeLike
March 4, 2016 at 3:55 pm
violetwisp
@Arb
Yes, I see you enjoyed being what you think a liberal feminist is. I was appalled when I started to read your response but it kind of made sense given the oddness of all your other beliefs. I’m still a bit confused that given your strong views on the film you would have images like that on your site. I wouldn’t, and I’m a liberal feminist (I think, although I should check the definition thoroughly before I swear in).
@The Great Atheist
I’m not surprised in the slightest you thought it was a great film. I’ve seen your sandwich joke. And, no, you’ll never hear the end of it. ;)
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 10:32 am
The Arbourist
@VW
Let’s chalk it up as a victory for satire. :)
Looking exclusively at individual problems and individual choices necessarily limits one’s ability to analyze systemic problems and features of society.
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 12:07 pm
syrbal-labrys
I did like Sucker Punch, it is frankly one of my ‘go to’ movies that makes the exact POINT of how women are objectified and treated in the world I live in; and I DO think that was intentional in the movie. I think a lot of folks miss the point when they criticize the film for “objectifying women”: that WAS the point, the entire fucking point. I am an old school feminist. Pragmatic and practical and humanist as well. So, endless argument over art forms of any sort as long as pay lags and child care is unsubsidized makes me look down my nose and sneer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:12 pm
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
Well said. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 6, 2016 at 1:47 am
violetwisp
@syrbal-labrys
“I did like Sucker Punch, it is frankly one of my ‘go to’ movies that makes the exact POINT of how women are objectified and treated in the world I live in”
Allegedly that was what the (male) film director wanted to do. He still had women needing ‘saved’ by men, and I have no doubt that you are in a 1% bracket of appreciation in this respect. 99% of the viewing audience were just confirming what fantasy women are. I’m going to try and get all the way through it. But regardless of the message of the film in its entirety, the way the images are presented in this video do nothing but perpetuate hot, sexy and young female objectification.
LikeLike