From Science Daily:
“Now neuroscientists at the University of Sussex’s Sackler Centre and Brighton and Sussex Medical School have identified the brain network system that causes us to stumble and stall just when we least want to.
Dr Michiko Yoshie and her colleagues Professor Hugo Critchley, Dr Neil Harrison, and Dr Yoko Nagai were able to pinpoint the brain area that causes the performance mishaps during an experiment using functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging (fMRI).
Previous research has shown that people tend to exert more force when they know they are being watched. For example, pianists unconsciously press keys harder when they play in front of an audience compared to when playing alone.
In the new study, published in Scientific Reports, participants’ brain activity was monitored while carrying out a task that required them to exert a precise amount of force when gripping an object.”
Now, can we apply this to women in who just happen to exist in society? – The Deep Woods certainly thinks so.
“Given the fact that women are constantly watched in our society, and we are constantly REMINDED that we are being watched by people making fun of fat, “ugly”, or gender-nonconforming women, it makes me wonder how many women have messed up important tasks or projects or just day-to-day activities because A PART OF OUR BRAIN is permanently being deactivated?
[…]
Women are constantly held under the microscope- whether we are attractive or unattractive, the gaze of patriarchy never ends.”
Can a parallel be drawn between having an audience, and the male-gaze that is ever present in our society? Looks like another study is in order, but the connection, if proven wouldn’t be particularly surprising.




17 comments
March 5, 2016 at 6:14 am
Steve Ruis
Thank you for this link. I am currently researching performance anxiety (for archers) and this is very interesting. Personally if I find myself being watched a lot, at first I feel awkward and then grumpy. I had never connected the thought with patriarchal attitudes toward women. Good work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 6:50 am
john zande
Interesting.
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 7:48 am
The Arbourist
@Steve Ruis
You are most welcome. :>
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 11:56 am
syrbal-labrys
Interestingly, I’ve observed this effect in my husband for years. He and I both actually stress SO much over the other observing that it screws up our performance as a team. I was reacting to his one-time constant auto-patriarchal patter (that is changing, btw, with counseling); he was reacting to my furious feminist counter-attacks.
I wonder, IS it mere observation that creates the effect? Or is it the perception of negative bias in the observer?
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:03 pm
Emma
The observer effect applies even in “cold” physics, so there is little doubt it would affect human interactions and performance. I’m glad it is being studied.
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 12:06 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
Agreed. There is still so much more we need to understand about the complexities of human behaviour.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:11 pm
The Arbourist
@Syrbal
I wonder if it might be the power differential we are raised to believe in, that could be playing a part?
I think of the boss/worker situation and the boundaries there that lead to all sorts of ‘dynamic’ situations/confrontations.
Could we overlay this onto the female/male power maldistribution in society? My gut says, it wouldn’t be much of stretch.
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 12:12 pm
syrbal-labrys
Not much of a stretch at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:19 pm
Emma
@Arb: Yes.
Are you familiar with research on the effect of stereotypes on test performance?
It’s pretty damning:
http://www.fairtest.org/stereotypes-lower-test-scores
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 12:23 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
Absolutely.
When teaching, I always try to prime my student for success, so pretty much I do the opposite of genderstereotypical behaviour described in the study.
Fortunately for us, priming works in both directions. :)
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:24 pm
Emma
You must be a good teacher, Arb.
What do you teach, BTW?
LikeLike
March 5, 2016 at 12:31 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
I studies History and English in my university days. Boots on the ground teaching experience though mostly with children in residential care and the psycho-social disorders/damage that goes along with that particular clientele. [ :( ]
Currently I’m a supply teacher, so I get to work my magic all over the school system, as I have the opportunity to teach from K to 12.
Thanks for the compliment. :) Oh! I just have to say you’re doing fine work with JJshaw over at VW’s,brava!
It’s hard sometimes when you’re dealing with an atmosphere that somehow imagines commercial rape to be a good thing for women. :/
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 12:55 pm
Emma
@Arb: Cool. Teaching is not an easy job, but it has its rewards. And good teachers change lives.
Tx. There is very little in terms of a meaningful convo on this subject with people who insist that having sex is like going to a restaurant. It’s not just a different outlook on life, it is a different universe altogether, made impenetrable by either a complete absence of conscience (or even “simple” imagination) or its willful (?) shut down . Been there, done that, got tired of debating the gloriousity of “sex work.”
But I have yet to meet a girl who dreams of becoming a masturbatory receptacle, a sexual outlet/toilet, for men. Doing “sex work” one day is not something little girls aspire to.
When I grow up, I want to make a life for myself by being penetrated in every possible way, often violently, by multiple strange men — many of them disordered and deranged, and unable to find a woman to form a relationship with for obvious reasons — who, after ejaculating into me, will care about me as much as about used tissue
said no little girl ever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 1:00 pm
The Arbourist
@Emma
Oh wow, Emma you really hit that out of the park.
Your words are so on point.
May I quote you for an upcoming post?
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5, 2016 at 1:28 pm
Emma
@Arb: By all means.
As you can imagine, I have more to say on the subject. I will limit myself, though, to this one additional point:
Just like there are no girls who dream of becoming an object to be used and abused (sexually and not), there is no parent who would encourage and champion that kind of “career” for their child(ren).
And that includes the johns, pimps, and “sex workers” themselves. I don’t know of a “sex worker,” even a “high class escort” or a “happy hooker,” who would encourage her children to pursue this line of “work.”
Check out this report, “Welcome to Paradise,” about German legal brothels: http://s.telegraph.co.uk/graphics/projects/welcome-to-paradise/
Here’s the end paragraph:
[The brothel] Paradise’s [owner] Jürgen Rudloff appeared in a documentary, “Sex – Made in Germany”, which aired on the German public broadcaster ARD last summer. In one scene he’s sitting in his spacious kitchen dressed in an open-necked white shirt and linen jacket, surrounded by his four shiny-haired, privately-educated children.
Would he be happy for either of his two daughters to work at Paradise, the interviewer asks. Rudloff turns puce. “Unthinkable, unthinkable,” he says. “The question alone is brutal. I don’t mean to offend the prostitutes but I try to raise my children so that they have professional opportunities. Most prostitutes don’t have those options. That’s why they’re doing that job.” He pauses and looks away.
“Unimaginable”, he repeats. “I don’t even want to think about it.”
That from a man who knows this “business” as few others do; he runs it, after all.
He does not even want to think about this option for his daughters, but he has no qualms “encouraging” unrelated women to join his “business.” Like so many johns and pimps and sex “business” owners, he’d do his very best to prevent his daughters from going into this line of “work,” but it does not stop him from exploiting other, powerless young women.
This peculiar mental split is depressingly common, and one dark aspect of male sexuality that nearly all men are in denial about and unwilling to explore, ever. Any attempts to have them try to even acknowledge and look at it are usually met with violent and/or hysterical reactions, accusing the questioneer of misandry and similar fairy tales, of demonizing male sexuality and trying to shut it down, etc. And, oh, freedom, wouldn’t you know. It’s as predictable as clockwork.
One thing that’s certain about human beings (apart from their endless stupidity) is their bottomless capacity for rationalization. There is no behavior, no matter how depraved and evil, that cannot be rationalized away by its participants and/or perpetrators.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 5, 2016 at 4:16 pm
Miep
Reblogged this on There Are So Many Things Wrong With This and commented:
Excellent.
LikeLike
March 10, 2016 at 5:13 am
Blamer Emma – On Prostitution a.k.a The Commercial Rape | Dead Wild Roses
[…] her comment to the main blog, as it is simply made of awesome and unworthy of being buried in a comments […]
LikeLike