You are currently browsing the monthly archive for February 2025.
Well, here we have 3 movie posters as they were displayed in mainland China. What do you see missing?
Are the anti-racism activists losing their minds about this? Can the vaunted arbiters of social justice be bothered with actual racism?
Naaaah. The REAL work is to keep looking for the systemically racism Unicorn that permeates EVERY facet of western society and must be rooted out – but only the experts can see it and you’ll have to hire them to get these dire systemic Unicorns out of your organization…
Should we actively oppose racism and racists sentiments, absolutely. Do we need a class of self appointed experts to root out the systemic racism that only they have the insight to see and root out? – Probably not.
In reference to an interesting coincidence, that through civil rights activism and a incremental changes to our society overt and institutionalized racism is largely over. But with most of racism in society gone, what then (thanks grok) – When cults face falsification of their beliefs, they often employ several strategies to retreat from reality:
Denial and Reinterpretation:
Denial: Cults might outright deny any evidence that contradicts their beliefs, claiming it to be false, misleading, or part of a conspiracy against them.
Reinterpretation: They might reinterpret the evidence in a way that fits their narrative. For example, if a prophecy doesn’t come true, they might claim it was a “spiritual” fulfillment or that the prophecy was misinterpreted by outsiders.
Isolation: Cults often increase their isolation from the outside world. This can involve moving to remote locations, restricting access to external information (like news or internet), or discouraging interactions with non-members. Isolation helps prevent members from being exposed to contradicting information or viewpoints
.
Shifting Blame or Goalposts:
Shifting Blame: If something goes wrong, rather than questioning the belief system, the leadership might blame members for not being faithful enough or external forces for interference.
Moving the Goalposts: They might change their doctrines or predictions subtly or significantly to account for the falsification without admitting error. This can mean setting new dates for prophecies or redefining what the prophecy meant.
Cognitive Dissonance Management:
When faced with evidence against their beliefs, members might experience cognitive dissonance. Cult leaders often provide explanations or new interpretations to reduce this discomfort, reinforcing loyalty and belief.
Increased Control and Manipulation:
There might be an increase in psychological manipulation techniques, like love bombing, where members are showered with affection to quell doubts, or fear tactics where leaving the group is associated with dire consequences.
Creation of Parallel Realities:
Cults might develop their own news sources, vocabulary, or interpretations of events to create a reality that aligns with their beliefs. This parallel reality can make external critique seem irrelevant or part of an antagonistic narrative.
Rituals and Practices:
Increasing the frequency or intensity of rituals can reinforce group identity and belief. These practices can act as a distraction from reality or as a mechanism to reaffirm faith in the face of contradictory evidence.
Charismatic Leadership:
The leader might become more central, perhaps through claiming new revelations or visions that explain away the falsification. This can also involve the leader becoming more authoritarian, ensuring that followers remain under tight control.
By using these methods, cults not only protect their belief systems from external critique but also maintain internal cohesion and loyalty among members, even when faced with undeniable evidence against their doctrines.
Well it seems we’re rapidly approaching this point.
This is why people call part of the Left “Looney”.
There is no current, direct evidence from official U.S. government channels suggesting an intention to annex Canada. However, there are several historical and contemporary discussions and actions that have fueled speculation on this topic:
Historical Context: Historically, there have been moments when the U.S. considered or discussed annexing parts or all of Canada, notably during the War of 1812 and in various post-war planning scenarios. For instance, the U.S. had plans like “War Plan Red” in the 1930s, which included strategies for dealing with Canada in the event of a conflict with Britain.
Recent Political Rhetoric: More recently, comments from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump in 2025 have stirred debate. Trump has suggested using “economic force” to make Canada the 51st state, mentioning this during a press conference and on social media. This rhetoric has been interpreted by some as serious intent, while others see it as negotiation tactics or bluster aimed at influencing trade or other policy negotiations.
Public and Media Reaction: Posts on X and articles from various news outlets have discussed these comments, with some expressing concern over U.S. intentions. However, these are often framed as speculative or as reactions to Trump’s statements rather than evidence of a formal policy.
Legal and Practical Considerations: Legally, annexation would require constitutional amendments and referendums in both countries, processes that are complex and politically unfeasible without mutual consent. The practicalities of annexation, including military and economic implications, are also significant deterrents.
Canadian Response: Canadian leaders, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have strongly rejected these ideas, with statements indicating no possibility of Canada becoming a U.S. state. This reflects a strong national sentiment against such a move.
While there is no concrete evidence of an active plan to annex Canada, the historical interest, coupled with recent provocative political rhetoric, keeps the topic in public discourse. However, without a formal policy or legislative action, these discussions remain speculative or part of political posturing rather than actual policy intent.
Harvard professor Roland Fryer discusses his research on police brutality in this video, focusing on the data regarding racial bias in police interactions.
Fryer’s study found no racial differences in lethal uses of force by police, which contradicted common narratives and led to significant backlash.
The conversation explores the academic and public response to his findings, highlighting the controversy and criticism he faced.
Fryer emphasizes his commitment to truth-telling despite the personal and professional repercussions, including being suspended by Harvard.
Theo Dalrymple is the pen name of Anthony Malcolm Daniels, a British writer, retired prison doctor, and psychiatrist. Known for his conservative cultural critiques, Daniels, under the pseudonym Theodore Dalrymple, has worked in various settings, including in Sub-Saharan African countries and the East End of London. Before his retirement in 2005, he was associated with the City Hospital and Winson Green Prison in Birmingham, England.
Dalrymple is a prolific writer, contributing to several publications such as the City Journal (where he is a contributing editor and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute), The Spectator, The Times, The Observer, The Daily Telegraph, among others. His work often reflects on culture, politics, medicine, and social issues, drawing from his extensive experience as a physician and psychiatrist.
Some of his notable books include:
Life at the Bottom: The Worldview That Makes the Underclass (2001)
Our Culture, What’s Left of It (2005)
Spoilt Rotten: The Toxic Cult of Sentimentality (2010)
He has also been recognized for his contributions, receiving the 2011 Freedom Prize from the Flemish think tank Libera! for his work in human rights and political freedom. His writing style and perspective have earned him descriptions like “the Orwell of our time” from Denis Dutton, editor of Arts & Letters Daily.
Dalrymple’s pseudonym “Theodore Dalrymple” was chosen for its sound, which he described as “suitably dyspeptic,” like that of a “gouty old man looking out of the window of his London club, port in hand, lamenting the degenerating state of the world.” He is known for his incisive, often satirical commentary on contemporary society and its moral and cultural decline.
bleatmop
Mystro
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…