You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Olympics’ tag.
Trying to find video evidence of this… event was a bit challenging. If the video does not start at 6:24 please navigate to that timestamp to witness a PHd demonstrate her craft in ‘breaking’.
Let’s look at some samples of her “scholarship”.
“We argue that breaking’s institutionalization via the Olympics will place breaking more firmly within this sporting nation’s hegemonic settler-colonial structures that rely upon racialized and gendered hierarchies.”
This intentional word salad is endemic across all of the Grievance Study fields – for those not in the know – any course that ends in “Studies” usually qualifies as a Grievance Study. Essentially these are ‘fields’ that have been set up to give employment to ‘scholars’ that otherwise would not be able to find a job anywhere in society.
Thus the only vocation available is one of indoctrinating others into the bullshit and churning out vacuous papers that cite other bullshit papers (citation laundering) in attempt to look like a credible academic subject.
Let’s see what the good Dr.Gunn says on ‘breaking’.
And finally the best for last:
So to put things in perspective – the video of Gunn ‘breaking’ is the prefect illustration of her grasp of the subject, and really her connection to reality.
The last two days have been a revelation for me having gone down the Social Media rabbit hole on the males in female sport issue. What was most jaw dropping was the absolute conviction and dedication to a narrative that is most likely false. Both boxers Khelif and Lin Yu-ting did not meet the requirements for being female. Link here.
So, if one were to follow the available evidence a reasonable assumption could be made that both Khelif and Lin Yu-ting are male. They may present as female, but a male with a disorder of sexual development remains male. The ARD5 DSD is a likely diagnosis as detail by Dr. Emma Hilton:
So, the evidence available points toward both boxers being male. You would think though that if they were female they would submit the cheek swab that would end all of this controversy for good. Yet neither has. Funny how that works.
Picking on Christians is fair game. The rules of ‘being offended’ don’t seem to apply to certain groups in society. Just imagine if one of the sacred castes were lampooned. We’d be hearing about the “x”-phobia and hate for weeks.
A snippet from Spiked Online’s Brendan O’Neill
“Christians are angry. As well they might be. This was ‘extremely disrespectful to Christians’, said Elon Musk. Now, naturally, there’s a backlash against the backlash. Calm down, the woke are saying. Stop being such prudes and snowflakes, they’re chortling. It’s just a little light mockery, they’re insisting. Which is big talk from a section of society that would be weeping into its keffiyehs and demanding heads on spikes if the ceremony had featured a drag-act Muhammad being served a smurf on a plate of fruit with his cock out.
For me – a non-prude and non-snowflake who fully supports the liberty of blasphemy – the question is not ‘How could you disparage Christ like this?!’, but ‘Why would you disparage Christ like this?’. At an Olympics opening ceremony. In front of a billion viewers (well, until we switched off). I have no problem with drag acts in Soho, or Le Marais, of course. But at the opening ceremony to an international celebration of human brotherhood? I’m fine with mockery of religious idols and beliefs, if that’s what you want to do. But at the Olympic Games? Why? Why sully this ancient competition with the infantile Christ-bashing of the conformist godless drones of the modern culture industry?”
“Inclusion” is the new best and brightest way to hide your fundamental hatred of women. Gender ideology is a toxic mess of male supremacy and misogyny wrapped up in friendly pink and blue colours. The erasure of females from society has always been the endgame and the Olympic Weightlifting debacle is a prime example of the bullshit that is going on under the guise of “inclusion”.
“WELLINGTON, June 21 (Reuters) – Weightlifter Laurel Hubbard will become the first transgender athlete to compete at the Olympics after being selected by New Zealand for the women’s event at the Tokyo Games, a decision set to reignite a debate over inclusion and fairness in sport.
Hubbard will compete in the super-heavyweight 87+kg category, her selection made possible by an update to qualifying requirements in May.
The 43-year-old, who will be the oldest lifter at the Games, had competed in men’s weightlifting competitions before transitioning in 2013.”
Who is Laurel Hubbard? This is the dude in question. As we can all definitively see, with absolutely no doubt, a female…
Ask yourself folks, is any ideology that requires you to disbelieve your eyes and ignore basic biological fact worthy of your support?
“Save Women’s Sport Australasia, a group opposed to transgender women competing in women’s sports, said Hubbard’s selection was allowed by “flawed policy from the IOC”.
“Males do have a performance advantage that is based on their biological sex,” the group’s co-founder Katherine Deves told Reuters TV.
“They outperform us on every single metric – speed, stamina, strength. Picking testosterone is a red herring … We are forgetting about the anatomy, the faster twitch muscle, the bigger organs.”
Of course, when mediocre males are allowed into female sports, females always lose out. The loser in this case is Kuinini Manumua.
This, rightly, is a travesty. It is right before our eyes, and yet somehow it is still going to happen. This is the result.
The new misogyny is so much like the old misogyny, but now with the feel good inclusion angle that quietly instead of overtly erases females from society. Woohoo!
Patriarchy is alive and well in 2016. Let’s head over to the Olympics – Exhibit 1:
Oh, look who owns her. Her position of ‘wife’ is obviously relevant information as to HER Olympic achievement.
Ooookay. Maybe this is just a fluke this isn’t a implicit patriarchal norm – we just need to find all the stories that mention a man’s status as “husband” first then his achievement… (good luck with that).
Surely in swimming it must not be the case:
Ah, because the man-stroke is the only stroke that could possibly be responsible for her achievement. Not her ability, her talent, her fucking grit – nope nope nope – manstroke for the winz.
Seeing a pattern here? The systematic denial of female agency and achievement – and attributing said achievement to a man. Feeling the 2016 equality yet?
May as well be, if you happen to be female and good at something. :/
“Oh Arb!” says my skeptical male readership, “These are just rare incidences and are in the realm of sports – sports are known for their male bias you shouldn’t be making hasty generalizations about society based of a few sports clips.”
Maybe popular magazine covers?
Apparently only the male face is appropriate for Magazine covers, females though, as long as you are almost naked, then you are allowed to have a head.
Nope…popular magazine are still all-a-board the patriarchy bus.
Okay dudes, lets change the channel, how about leadership of the Western Free World? Certainly the framing of female success through the patriarchal lens won’t happen here! (oh wait…)
Correction – First female to win the nomination to be president of the US. What do the papers record – her husband at HER nomination victory. I can’t wait to see the pictures if HRC wins the presidency, more pictures of Bill?
Yeah, sooooooo… When you hear people (mostly dudes) prattle on about society becoming a matriarchy or that we’ve achieved equality, kindly refer them to this post and maybe help explain to them that their cluelessness is really quite embarrassing.
Why is it hard for women to achieve in our society? Partially because of the systemic shit like this that denies women their role models and examples of success – you can’t be it, if you don’t see it. So let’s not discount effective feminism and the work that still needs to be done by radical organized groups of females working together to dismantle the patriarchal superstructure that harms women and men.
bleatmop
Mystro
The Arbourist
Dead Wild Roses 
Your opinions…