From the CBC:
“Emergency crews have found a second body in the wreckage where a small plane smashed into an Austin, Texas, office building that houses a U.S. Internal Revenue Service office.”
Okay, flying a plane into a building. We’ve seen that before. But what is different this time? It seems that it is taking awhile to classify the act itself. Would there be as much confusion if the pilot was of Arabic descent or had a Arabic surname? That is the question ‘Big man” poses at the blog ‘Stuff White People do“.
Big Man says:
“I’m watching the coverage of this plane crash in Austin. The one where a dude flew a plane into the IRS building after burning his house.
And everybody is falling all over themselves not to call this cat a “terrorist.”
It’s “possible terrorist-related activity” but it’s not terrorism and he’s not a terrorist. What the hell?
How can you fly a plane into a building out of spite, and have folks call it “suicide by plane?” That’s like calling it “suicide by portable chest bomb.”
We often think of racism is a in your face type of action. Overt discrimination, the name calling, the hiring practices but here we have a possible example of the more subtle systematic nature of racism and what that entails. Patriarchy sneaks up on one like this as well.
I tend to agree with BigMan that the story would have been framed quite differently if the pilot was not Caucasian.




4 comments
February 25, 2010 at 4:26 pm
blackwatertown
Just discovered your blog. Interesting pieces. Thanks
LikeLike
February 25, 2010 at 5:35 pm
The Arbourist
Thanks for the compliment and for stopping by :>
LikeLike
February 26, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Benjamin Kritikos
Yeah, you’re dead right.
Conversely, something completely unrelated to terrorism happens, and the word “terrorism” still pops up, no matter how irrelevant. I love that.
Or take the logic further, and you have Mossad most likely assassinating an admittedly unsavoury political figure and it’s not “terrorism” but simply “assassination”.
Such are the times.
Good blog, by the way.
LikeLike
February 27, 2010 at 8:49 am
The Arbourist
It is scary how we bend the rules depending on who we are targeting at the time. Much has been said about justice and equality before the law, but when the sharp pointy bits come out, all bets are off, so it would seem.
LikeLike